Suppr超能文献

在初级卫生保健背景下瑞典定向健康对话中使用的关于身体活动和久坐时间的问题与基于设备的测量方法之间的一致性。

Agreement between questions about physical activity and sitting time, and device-based measures, used in Swedish targeted health dialogues in the context of primary health care.

作者信息

Johansson Lisbeth M, Lingfors Hans, Golsäter Marie, Rolander Bo, Fransson Eleonor I

机构信息

Unit for Research and Development in Primary Care, Futurum-Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.

Sweden and Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Box 1026, Jönköping, 551 11, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul 4;15(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00690-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important that easy-to-use measures like subjective questions about physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour are valid and reliable providing accurate measures, when they are used in health promotion work aiming to support people to improve their lifestyle habits such as PA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of a structured interview form estimating self-reported PA and a question about sitting time used in Swedish targeted health dialogues in the context of primary health care.

METHOD

The study was conducted in the southern part of Sweden. To evaluate concurrent validity of the interview form, time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA) and energy expenditure related to MVPA estimated by an interview form was compared with the same measures assessed by an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer. To evaluate a question about sitting time, the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences' single-item question about sitting time (SED-GIH) was compared with measures from an activPAL inclinometer. Statistical analyses included deriving Bland‒Altman plots and calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULT

Bland‒Altman plots indicated lower absolute variation in the difference between self-reported and device-based PA measures for lower PA levels, both for energy expenditure and time spent in MVPA. No systematic over- or underestimation was observed. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between self-reported and device-based PA measures was 0.27 (p = 0.014) for time spent in MVPA and 0.26 (p = 0.022) for energy expenditure. The correlation coefficient between the single item question and device-based sitting time measures was 0.31 (p = 0.002). Sitting time was underestimated by 74% of the participants.

CONCLUSION

The PA interview form and the SED-GIH question on sitting time may be of value in targeted health dialogues in primary health care with the intention to support sedentary and insufficiently physically active persons in increasing their physical activity and limiting their sitting time. The questionnaires are easy to use and are more cost effective than device-based measures, especially regarding population-based interventions conducted in primary health care for thousands of participants such as targeted health dialogues.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

在旨在支持人们改善生活方式习惯(如身体活动)的健康促进工作中,像关于身体活动(PA)和久坐行为的主观问题这类易于使用的测量方法,若能提供准确的测量结果,其有效性和可靠性至关重要。本研究的目的是评估在初级卫生保健背景下,瑞典针对性健康对话中使用的一种结构化访谈形式(用于估计自我报告的PA)以及一个关于久坐时间的问题的同时效度。

方法

该研究在瑞典南部进行。为评估访谈形式的同时效度,将通过访谈形式估计的中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)所花费的时间以及与MVPA相关的能量消耗,与通过ActiGraph GT3X - BT加速度计评估的相同测量值进行比较。为评估一个关于久坐时间的问题,将瑞典体育与健康科学学院关于久坐时间的单项问题(SED - GIH)与来自activPAL倾斜仪的测量值进行比较。统计分析包括绘制布兰德 - 奥特曼图以及计算斯皮尔曼等级相关系数。

结果

布兰德 - 奥特曼图表明,对于较低的PA水平,自我报告的和基于设备的PA测量值之间差异的绝对变化较小,无论是能量消耗还是MVPA所花费的时间。未观察到系统性的高估或低估。自我报告的和基于设备的PA测量值之间,MVPA所花费时间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.27(p = 0.014),能量消耗的相关系数为0.26(p = 0.022)。单项问题与基于设备的久坐时间测量值之间的相关系数为0.31(p = 0.002)。74%的参与者低估了久坐时间。

结论

PA访谈形式和关于久坐时间的SED - GIH问题,在初级卫生保健的针对性健康对话中可能具有价值,旨在支持久坐且身体活动不足的人增加身体活动并减少久坐时间。这些问卷易于使用,并且比基于设备的测量方法更具成本效益,特别是对于在初级卫生保健中针对数千名参与者进行的基于人群的干预措施,如针对性健康对话。

临床试验注册

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/10318802/3de7753b8784/13102_2023_690_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验