State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023 Aug;43(8):896-908. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12462. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
The current standard of care for non-bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 0 is four cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) but whether the same efficacy can be achieved with reduced chemotherapy regimen of four cycles for non-bulky DLBCL patients with an IPI of 1 remains unclear. This study compared four cycles versus six cycles of chemotherapy in non-bulky low-risk DLBCL patients with negative interim positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT, Deauville 1-3), irrespective of age and other IPI risk factors (IPI 0-1).
This was an open-label, randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Patients aged 14-75 years with newly diagnosed low-risk DLBCL, according to IPI, achieving PET-CT confirmed complete response (CR) after four cycles of R-CHOP were randomized (1:1) between four cycles of rituximab (4R-CHOP+4R arm) or two cycles of R-CHOP plus two cycles of rituximab (6R-CHOP+2R arm). The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), conducted in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients with at least one cycle of assigned treatment. The non-inferiority margin was -8%.
A total of 287 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, the median follow-up was 47.3 months, and the 2-year PFS rate was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92% to 99%) and 94% (95% CI, 91% to 98%) for the 4R-CHOP+4R and 6R-CHOP+2R arm. The absolute difference in 2-year PFS between the two arms was 1% (95% CI, -5% to 7%), supporting the non-inferiority of 4R-CHOP+4R. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower in the last four cycles of rituximab alone in the 4R-CHOP+4R arm (16.7% versus 76.9%), with decreased risk of febrile neutropenia (0.0% versus 8.4%) and infection (2.1% versus 14.0%).
For newly diagnosed low-risk DLBCL patients, interim PET-CT after four cycles of R-CHOP was effective in identifying patients with Deauville 1-3 who would have a good response and Deauville 4-5 patients who might have high-risk biological features or develop resistance. Reducing the standard six cycles to four cycles of chemotherapy had comparable clinical efficacy and fewer adverse events in low-risk, non-bulky DLBCL with interim PET-CT confirmed CR.
对于国际预后指数(IPI)为 0 的非肿块弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者,目前的标准治疗方法是四个周期的利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP),但对于 IPI 为 1 的非肿块性 DLBCL 患者,是否可以用四个周期的减少化疗方案来达到相同的疗效尚不清楚。本研究比较了非肿块性低危 DLBCL 患者(IPI 0-1)在接受四个周期与六个周期化疗后的疗效,这些患者的中期正电子发射断层扫描与计算机断层扫描(PET-CT,Deauville 1-3)为阴性,不论年龄和其他 IPI 危险因素如何。
这是一项开放标签、随机、III 期、非劣效性试验。年龄在 14-75 岁之间、新诊断为低危 DLBCL、根据 IPI 在四个周期的 R-CHOP 治疗后达到 PET-CT 确认的完全缓解(CR)的患者,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配至四个周期的利妥昔单抗(4R-CHOP+4R 组)或两个周期的 R-CHOP 加两个周期的利妥昔单抗(6R-CHOP+2R 组)。主要终点是 2 年无进展生存期(PFS),在意向治疗人群中进行。在至少接受一个周期指定治疗的患者中评估安全性。非劣效性边界为-8%。
共有 287 名患者纳入意向治疗分析,中位随访时间为 47.3 个月,4R-CHOP+4R 组和 6R-CHOP+2R 组的 2 年 PFS 率分别为 95%(95%CI,92%-99%)和 94%(95%CI,91%-98%)。两个治疗组之间的 2 年 PFS 绝对差异为 1%(95%CI,-5%-7%),支持 4R-CHOP+4R 的非劣效性。4R-CHOP+4R 组中最后四个周期单独使用利妥昔单抗的 3-4 级中性粒细胞减少症发生率较低(16.7% vs. 76.9%),发热性中性粒细胞减少症(0.0% vs. 8.4%)和感染(2.1% vs. 14.0%)的风险降低。
对于新诊断的低危 DLBCL 患者,R-CHOP 四个周期后的中期 PET-CT 可有效识别出 Deauville 1-3 患者,这些患者有良好的反应,Deauville 4-5 患者可能具有高危生物学特征或发生耐药。在中期 PET-CT 确认 CR 的非肿块性、低危、DLBCL 患者中,将标准的 6 个周期化疗减少至 4 个周期,具有相似的临床疗效,且不良反应更少。