Suppr超能文献

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的疗效比较:一项多中心队列研究。

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Clinical Pharmacy Services, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Aug 17;67(8):e0040523. doi: 10.1128/aac.00405-23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%;  = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%;  = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%;  = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%;  = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

摘要

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦(C-T)和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)是两种新型的抗菌药物,对耐药铜绿假单胞菌仍具有活性。C-T 与 CAZ-AVI 的疗效和安全性比较尚不清楚。本研究在沙特阿拉伯的六家三级中心进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究,纳入了接受 C-T 或 CAZ-AVI 治疗的多重耐药(MDR)铜绿假单胞菌感染患者。主要研究结局包括院内总体死亡率、30 天死亡率和临床治愈率。还评估了安全性结局。采用 logistic 回归的多变量分析来确定治疗对主要研究结局的独立影响。本研究共纳入 200 例患者(每组 100 例)。其中 56%患者在重症监护病房,48%患者接受机械通气,37%患者发生感染性休克。约 19%的患者有菌血症。41%的患者接受了联合治疗。C-T 组和 CAZ-AVI 组的院内总体死亡率(44%比 37%;  = 0.314;OR,1.34;95%CI,0.76 至 2.36)、30 天死亡率(27%比 23%;  = 0.514;OR,1.24;95%CI,0.65 至 2.35)、临床治愈率(61%比 66%;  = 0.463;OR,0.81;95%CI,0.43 至 1.49)和急性肾损伤发生率(23%比 17%;  = 0.289;OR,1.46;95%CI,0.69 至 3.14)差异均无统计学意义,即使在校正了两组间的差异后也是如此。C-T 和 CAZ-AVI 在安全性和疗效方面无显著差异,它们是治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的潜在选择。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验