Suppr超能文献

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的疗效比较:一项多中心队列研究。

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Clinical Pharmacy Services, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Aug 17;67(8):e0040523. doi: 10.1128/aac.00405-23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%;  = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%;  = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%;  = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%;  = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

摘要

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦(C-T)和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)是两种新型的抗菌药物,对耐药铜绿假单胞菌仍具有活性。C-T 与 CAZ-AVI 的疗效和安全性比较尚不清楚。本研究在沙特阿拉伯的六家三级中心进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究,纳入了接受 C-T 或 CAZ-AVI 治疗的多重耐药(MDR)铜绿假单胞菌感染患者。主要研究结局包括院内总体死亡率、30 天死亡率和临床治愈率。还评估了安全性结局。采用 logistic 回归的多变量分析来确定治疗对主要研究结局的独立影响。本研究共纳入 200 例患者(每组 100 例)。其中 56%患者在重症监护病房,48%患者接受机械通气,37%患者发生感染性休克。约 19%的患者有菌血症。41%的患者接受了联合治疗。C-T 组和 CAZ-AVI 组的院内总体死亡率(44%比 37%;  = 0.314;OR,1.34;95%CI,0.76 至 2.36)、30 天死亡率(27%比 23%;  = 0.514;OR,1.24;95%CI,0.65 至 2.35)、临床治愈率(61%比 66%;  = 0.463;OR,0.81;95%CI,0.43 至 1.49)和急性肾损伤发生率(23%比 17%;  = 0.289;OR,1.46;95%CI,0.69 至 3.14)差异均无统计学意义,即使在校正了两组间的差异后也是如此。C-T 和 CAZ-AVI 在安全性和疗效方面无显著差异,它们是治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的潜在选择。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验