Akhondzadeh Reza, Olapour Alireza, Javaherforooshzadeh Fatemeh, Rashidi Mahboobeh, Bakhtiari Nima, Hosseininejad Fatemeh
Department of Anesthesia, Pain Research Centre, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Pharmacology, Pain Research Centre, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb 5;13(1):e134065. doi: 10.5812/aapm-134065. eCollection 2023 Feb.
This study compared dexmedetomidine to fentanyl as an adjunct to ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery.
A total of 56 patients in two different groups with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl underwent the epidural anesthesia method by ropivacaine. This study compared the onset and duration of sensory block, duration of motor block, visual analog scale (VAS) analgesia, and sedation score. The VAS and hemodynamics (e.g., heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were measured every 5 to 15 minutes, then every 15 minutes to the end of the surgery, and then in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours after surgery.
In the fentanyl group, the onset time of the sensory block was longer (P < 0.001), and the duration of the block was shorter than in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.045). In the fentanyl group, the onset time of motor block was longer than in the dexmedetomidine group (P < 0.001). The mean highest VAS score for each patient in the dexmedetomidine group was 4.9 ± 0.6, compared to the fentanyl group (5.8 ± 0.9), with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). The sedation score was higher from the 30th minute (P = 0.01) to the 120th minute (P = 0.04) in the patients of the dexmedetomidine group than in the fentanyl group. Side effects, such as dry mouth, hypotension, and bradycardia, were more common in the dexmedetomidine group, and nausea and vomiting were more common in the fentanyl group; however, there were no differences between the groups. There was no respiratory depression in both groups.
This study presented that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in epidural anesthesia for orthopedic femoral fracture surgery shortens the onset time of sensory and motor block, increases analgesia length, and prolongs anesthesia. Sedation with dexmedetomidine is better than fentanyl, with fewer side effects, and more effective as preemptive analgesia.
本研究比较了右美托咪定与芬太尼作为罗哌卡因辅助药物用于股骨颈骨折手术患者硬膜外麻醉的效果。
共有56例患者被分为两组,分别接受右美托咪定和芬太尼联合罗哌卡因的硬膜外麻醉方法。本研究比较了感觉阻滞的起效时间和持续时间、运动阻滞的持续时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)镇痛情况及镇静评分。每5至15分钟测量一次VAS和血流动力学指标(如心率和平均动脉压),然后在手术结束前每15分钟测量一次,术后第1、2、4、6、12和24小时也进行测量。
在芬太尼组,感觉阻滞的起效时间更长(P < 0.001),且阻滞持续时间比右美托咪定组短(P = 0.045)。在芬太尼组,运动阻滞的起效时间比右美托咪定组长(P < 0.001)。右美托咪定组每位患者的平均最高VAS评分为4.9 ± 0.6,而芬太尼组为5.8 ± 0.9,两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。右美托咪定组患者从第30分钟(P = 0.01)至第120分钟(P = 0.04)的镇静评分高于芬太尼组。口干、低血压和心动过缓等副作用在右美托咪定组更常见,恶心和呕吐在芬太尼组更常见;然而,两组间无差异。两组均未出现呼吸抑制。
本研究表明,右美托咪定作为骨科股骨骨折手术硬膜外麻醉的辅助药物,可缩短感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间,延长镇痛时间,并延长麻醉时间。右美托咪定的镇静效果优于芬太尼,副作用更少,作为超前镇痛更有效。