• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚焦社区样本中健康促进的 RCT 特征:基于 d-CoSPICO 框架的范围综述方案。

Characteristics of RCTs focusing on health promotion in community samples: a scoping review protocol based on the d-CoSPICO framework.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 4;13(7):e064769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064769.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064769
PMID:37407032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10335424/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Developing the capabilities of individuals, groups and communities to enhance their health has received a great deal of attention in the literature. One essential source of results is evidence-based intervention programmes, which often involve a number of different variables. This paper describes a methodology for carrying out a scoping review that maps available evidence on randomised controlled trials focusing on health promotion intervention programmes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The scoping review protocol follows the general Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. It also incorporates some modifications to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review flowchart and complements its methodological framework. This new format, called documents, Concept, Studies, Participants, Interventions, Comparator, and Outcomes (d-CoSPICO), guides the review sequence, which is represented in a flowchart. The search will focus on different sources of information using formal (searches in thematic -PubPsych, ERIC, MedLine, PsychINFO- and multidisciplinary databases -Academic Search Ultimate, Core Collection Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest-, repositories and other websites), informal (contact with researchers), and retrospective (previous reviews on this topic) strategies to identify relevant publications until 2021, including grey literature. Coding, identification, selection, and data extraction will be carried out following the generation of a database in which each retrieved record's content (abstract and/or full text) can be analysed. The review is expected to be completed in 2023.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review. The d-CoSPICO framework and the results will be disseminated through (a) peer-reviewed publications; (b) presentations at scientific dissemination events and (c) training activities for applying this protocol.

摘要

简介

提高个人、群体和社区的能力以增进其健康已受到文献的广泛关注。其中一个重要的成果来源是基于证据的干预计划,这些计划通常涉及许多不同的变量。本文介绍了一种方法,用于进行范围综述,该综述旨在绘制关于侧重于健康促进干预计划的随机对照试验的现有证据。

方法和分析

范围综述方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及 Joanna Briggs 研究所指南。它还对首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析扩展进行了一些修改,以纳入范围综述流程图,并补充了其方法框架。这种新格式称为文档、概念、研究、参与者、干预、对照和结果(d-CoSPICO),指导审查顺序,该顺序以流程图表示。搜索将侧重于使用正式(在主题-PubPsych、ERIC、MedLine、PsychINFO-和多学科数据库-学术搜索终极版、核心集合 Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest-、存储库和其他网站中进行搜索)、非正式(与研究人员联系)和回顾性(关于该主题的先前评论)策略来识别相关出版物,直到 2021 年,包括灰色文献。编码、识别、选择和数据提取将按照生成数据库的方式进行,其中可以分析每个检索记录的内容(摘要和/或全文)。预计该综述将于 2023 年完成。

伦理和传播

本次综述不需要伦理批准。d-CoSPICO 框架和结果将通过以下方式传播:(a)同行评议出版物;(b)在科学传播活动中的演讲;(c)培训活动,以应用该方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec9/10335424/068d378c2309/bmjopen-2022-064769f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec9/10335424/546a5815768f/bmjopen-2022-064769f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec9/10335424/068d378c2309/bmjopen-2022-064769f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec9/10335424/546a5815768f/bmjopen-2022-064769f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec9/10335424/068d378c2309/bmjopen-2022-064769f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of RCTs focusing on health promotion in community samples: a scoping review protocol based on the d-CoSPICO framework.聚焦社区样本中健康促进的 RCT 特征:基于 d-CoSPICO 框架的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 4;13(7):e064769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064769.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol.评估具有风险分类的产科接待服务质量:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e066009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009.
7
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
8
Urinary incontinence in older men: protocol for a scoping review of risk factors.老年男性尿失禁:风险因素的范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e068956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068956.
9
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
10
Characteristics of programmes designed to link community-dwelling older adults in high-income countries from community to clinical sectors: a scoping review protocol.旨在将高收入国家社区居住的老年人群从社区连接到临床领域的方案的特点:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):e072617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072617.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural Competence Interventions in European Healthcare: A Scoping Review.欧洲医疗保健中的文化能力干预措施:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 17;12(10):1040. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101040.

本文引用的文献

1
Academic Procrastination in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.儿童和青少年的学业拖延:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Jun 5;10(6):1016. doi: 10.3390/children10061016.
2
Health behavior interventions for university students measuring mental health outcomes: A scoping review.针对大学生心理健康结果的健康行为干预措施:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;10:1063429. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063429. eCollection 2022.
3
Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review.老年保健中的人工智能:一项范围综述。
Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Jan;83:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101808. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
5
Psychodrama Group Therapy for Social Issues: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials.心理剧团体治疗社会问题:对照临床试验的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094442.
6
What you need to know about scoping reviews.系统评价概述:您需要了解的内容
Medwave. 2021 Mar 30;21(2):e8144. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.02.8144.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
9
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.我应该进行什么样的系统评价?医学和健康科学系统评价者的建议分类法和指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.