• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《成人智力残疾患者家属需求量表》的心理计量学特性,哥伦比亚版本。

Psychometric properties of the needs scale for families of adults with intellectual disabilities, Colombian version.

机构信息

Instituto de La Familia, Universidad de La Sabana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Institute of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Colomb Med (Cali). 2023 Jan 30;54(1):e2023674. doi: 10.25100/cm.v54i1.3674. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.25100/cm.v54i1.3674
PMID:37408645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319430/
Abstract

AIM

Assess the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Family Needs Assessment (FNA) questionnaire designed for adults in Colombia. Conducting research studies to validate the FNA questionnaire in other contexts and age groups is important.

METHODS

Five hundred fifty-four caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities participated in the study (298 men and 256 women). The ages of the individuals with disabilities ranged from 18 to 76 years. The authors carried out the linguistic adaptation of the items and cognitive interviews to identify if the items evaluated what was intended. A pilot test with 20 participants was also conducted. An initial confirmatory factor analysis was carried out. Given that, this analysis did not show a good adjustment of the theoretical model initially proposed, an exploratory factor analysis was carried out to elucidate the most appropriate structure for the Colombian population..

RESULTS

The factor analysis found five factors, each with a high ordinal alpha (Caregiving and family interaction, social interaction and future planning, Economy, and recreation, independent living skills or autonomy, and Services related to disability). Of the 76 items, 59 were preserved, which had a factorial load greater than 0.40; and 17 were left out because they did not meet this requirement..

CONCLUSION

Future research considers corroborating the five factors found and establishing their clinical applications. Concerning the concurrent validity, the families perceive that high need for social interaction and future planning and little support for the person with an intellectual disability.

摘要

目的

评估专为哥伦比亚成年人设计的家庭需求评估(FNA)问卷的可靠性和有效性的心理测量学特性。在其他背景和年龄组中进行研究以验证 FNA 问卷非常重要。

方法

554 名成年智障人士的照顾者参与了研究(298 名男性和 256 名女性)。残疾人士的年龄从 18 岁到 76 岁不等。作者对项目进行了语言适应性和认知访谈,以确定评估的项目是否符合预期。还对 20 名参与者进行了试点测试。进行了初步的验证性因素分析。由于该分析未显示出最初提出的理论模型的良好调整,因此进行了探索性因素分析,以阐明哥伦比亚人群最合适的结构。

结果

因子分析发现了五个因素,每个因素的有序 alpha 值都很高(照顾和家庭互动、社会互动和未来规划、经济、娱乐、独立生活技能或自主性以及与残疾相关的服务)。在 76 个项目中,保留了 59 个,其因子负荷大于 0.40;17 个被排除在外,因为它们不符合这一要求。

结论

未来的研究考虑验证所发现的五个因素,并确定它们的临床应用。关于同时效度,家庭认为社会互动和未来规划的需求很高,而对智障人士的支持很少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c7/10319430/62b5ee43ef26/1657-9534-cm-54-01-e2023674-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c7/10319430/c8a42c0f6466/1657-9534-cm-54-01-e2023674-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c7/10319430/62b5ee43ef26/1657-9534-cm-54-01-e2023674-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c7/10319430/c8a42c0f6466/1657-9534-cm-54-01-e2023674-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44c7/10319430/62b5ee43ef26/1657-9534-cm-54-01-e2023674-gf2.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the needs scale for families of adults with intellectual disabilities, Colombian version.《成人智力残疾患者家属需求量表》的心理计量学特性,哥伦比亚版本。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2023 Jan 30;54(1):e2023674. doi: 10.25100/cm.v54i1.3674. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Adult Independence Living Measurement Scale: Psychometric validation of a scale to estimate personal skills for independent living in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.成人独立生活测量量表:用于评估智力和发育障碍人士独立生活个人技能的量表的心理测量学验证。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Jun;67(6):560-572. doi: 10.1111/jir.13028. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
Dimensionality and internal structure of the Colombian version of the INICO-FEAPS quality of life scale.哥伦比亚版 INICO-FEAPS 生活质量量表的维度和内部结构。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Dec;61(12):1094-1103. doi: 10.1111/jir.12425. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Functional abilities and cognitive decline in adult and aging intellectual disabilities. Psychometric validation of an Italian version of the Alzheimer's Functional Assessment Tool (AFAST): analysis of its clinical significance with linear statistics and artificial neural networks.成年及老年智力残疾者的功能能力与认知衰退。阿尔茨海默病功能评估工具(AFAST)意大利语版的心理测量学验证:运用线性统计和人工神经网络分析其临床意义。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Apr;59(4):370-84. doi: 10.1111/jir.12113. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Validation of a Scale on Society's Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities-Survey Study.验证一个针对社会对智障女性性行为态度的量表-调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013228.
6
A Multicentre Italian Validation Study in Aging Adults with Down Syndrome and Other Forms of Intellectual Disabilities: Dementia Screening Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.一项针对患有唐氏综合征及其他智力障碍形式的老年成年人的意大利多中心验证研究:智力障碍者痴呆筛查问卷
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(7):709-721. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170117094757.
7
Autonomy support in people with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability: Testing the Health Care Climate Questionnaire-Intellectual Disability.轻度至边缘智力障碍人群的自主性支持:测试《医疗保健氛围问卷-智力障碍》。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):159-163. doi: 10.1111/jar.12371. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Development and validation of the Learning Disabilities Needs Assessment Tool (LDNAT), a HoNOS-based needs assessment tool for use with people with intellectual disability.学习障碍需求评估工具(LDNAT)的开发与验证,这是一种基于《健康需求观察量表》(HoNOS)的需求评估工具,用于智障人士。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Dec;60(12):1178-1188. doi: 10.1111/jir.12340. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Validation of the Chinese version of the dementia screening questionnaire for individuals with intellectual disabilities (DSQIID-CV).智障人士痴呆筛查问卷中文版(DSQIID-CV)的验证
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Apr;59(4):385-95. doi: 10.1111/jir.12173. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Diener Satisfaction With Life Scale With Five Response Options Applied to the Colombian Population.五选项迪纳生活满意度量表在哥伦比亚人群中的心理测量特性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;9:767534. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.767534. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A Holistic Theoretical Approach to Intellectual Disability: Going Beyond the Four Current Perspectives.一种针对智力残疾的整体理论方法:超越当前的四种观点。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018 Apr;56(2):79-89. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.2.79.
2
Modeling contextual influences on parents with intellectual disability and their children.对智力残疾父母及其子女的情境影响进行建模。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov;116(6):419-37. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-116.6.419.
3
Parental supports for parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
为有智力和发育障碍的父母提供的家长支持。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011 Oct;49(5):388-91. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-49.5.388.
4
Service and support needs of Australian carers supporting a family member with disability at home.澳大利亚在家照顾残疾家庭成员的护理人员的服务与支持需求。
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep;34(3):239-47. doi: 10.1080/13668250903103668.
5
Spanish adaptation and validation of the Family Quality of Life Survey.《家庭生活质量调查问卷》的西班牙语改编与验证
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005 Oct;49(Pt 10):794-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00754.x.
6
Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity.你能帮我扶一下门吗?将残疾纳入多元化范畴。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2002 May;8(2):130-7. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130.