Suppr超能文献

意大利、葡萄牙和西班牙消费者对人造肉的认知。

Perception of cultured "meat" by Italian, Portuguese and Spanish consumers.

作者信息

Liu Jingjing, Almeida João M, Rampado Nicola, Panea Begoña, Hocquette Élise, Chriki Sghaier, Ellies-Oury Marie-Pierre, Hocquette Jean-Francois

机构信息

INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR 1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.

INIAV, Quinta da Fonte Boa, Vale de Santarém, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 20;10:1043618. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1043618. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how consumers ( = 2,171) originated from South-Western Europe (Italy, Portugal, and Spain) perceive cultured "meat" (CM) and if their demographic characteristics (origin, gender, age, education, occupation, and meat consumption) are related to their willingness to try (WTT), to regularly eat (WTE) and to pay (WTP) for CM. We found the current respondents had an initially positive attitude towards CM: 49% of them perceived CM as "promising and/or acceptable" and 23% "fun and/or intriguing" whereas 29% considered it as "absurd and/or disgusting". In addition, 66 and 25% would be willing and not willing to try CM, respectively. However, 43% had no WTE for CM and, 94% would not pay more for CM compared to conventional meat. Age and especially occupation were good indicators of consumer acceptance of CM. Respondents of 18-30 years of age had the highest acceptance. Respondents outside the meat sector had the highest WTE and people working within the meat sector had the lowest WTE, scientists (within or outside the meat sector) had the highest WTT, people not scientists but within the meat sector had the lowest WTT. Additionally, we found that men are more likely to accept CM than women, Spanish-speaking consumers had the highest WTT and WTE, people with vegan and vegetarian diets may pay more for CM but generally no more than for conventional meat. The perceptions that CM may be more eco-friendly, ethical, safe and healthy than conventional meat, and to a lower extent, the perception that current meat production causes ethical and environmental problems are likely to be major motives for the current respondents to try, regularly eat and pay for CM. On the opposite, lower perceptions of CM benefits and of conventional meat weaknesses more generally, plus emotional resistance towards CM are main barriers to accept CM.

摘要

本研究旨在调查来自西南欧(意大利、葡萄牙和西班牙)的2171名消费者如何看待人造肉(CM),以及他们的人口统计学特征(来源、性别、年龄、教育程度、职业和肉类消费情况)是否与他们尝试人造肉(WTT)、经常食用人造肉(WTE)以及为人造肉支付费用(WTP)的意愿相关。我们发现,当前的受访者对人造肉最初持积极态度:49%的人认为人造肉“有前景和/或可接受”,23%的人认为“有趣和/或吸引人”,而29%的人认为它“荒谬和/或令人厌恶”。此外,分别有66%和25%的人愿意和不愿意尝试人造肉。然而,43%的人没有经常食用人造肉的意愿,94%的人表示不会为人造肉支付比传统肉类更高的价格。年龄尤其是职业是消费者接受人造肉的良好指标。18至30岁的受访者接受度最高。肉类行业以外的受访者经常食用人造肉的意愿最高,而肉类行业内的人经常食用人造肉的意愿最低,科学家(无论是否在肉类行业)尝试人造肉的意愿最高,非科学家但在肉类行业内的人尝试人造肉的意愿最低。此外,我们发现男性比女性更有可能接受人造肉,说西班牙语的消费者尝试人造肉的意愿和经常食用人造肉的意愿最高,纯素食和素食者可能会为人造肉支付更多费用,但一般不会超过传统肉类。认为人造肉可能比传统肉类更环保、更符合道德、更安全健康,以及在较低程度上认为当前肉类生产会引发道德和环境问题,可能是当前受访者尝试、经常食用和为人造肉支付费用的主要动机。相反,对人造肉益处和传统肉类弱点的普遍认知较低,以及对人造肉的情感抵触是接受人造肉的主要障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454d/10319306/a9cef12cc065/fnut-10-1043618-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验