Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Acc Chem Res. 2023 Jul 18;56(14):2026-2036. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00231. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
ConspectusHypervalent iodine reagents find application as selective chemical oxidants in a diverse array of oxidative transformations. The utility of these reagents is often ascribed to (1) the proclivity to engage being selective two-electron redox transformations; (2) facile ligand exchange at the three-centered, four-electron (3c-4e) hypervalent iodine-ligand (I-X) bonds; and (3) the hypernucleofugacity of aryl iodides. One-electron redox and iodine radical chemistry is well-precedented in the context of inorganic hypervalent iodine chemistry─for example, in the iodide-triiodide couple that drives dye-sensitized solar cells. In contrast, organic hypervalent iodine chemistry has historically been dominated by the two-electron I(I)/I(III) and I(III)/I(V) redox couples, which results from intrinsic instability of the intervening odd-electron species. Transient iodanyl radicals (i.e., formally I(II) species), generated by reductive activation of hypervalent I-X bonds, have recently gained attention as potential intermediates in hypervalent iodine chemistry. Importantly, these open-shell intermediates are typically generated by activation of stoichiometric hypervalent iodine reagents, and the role of the iodanyl radical in substrate functionalization and catalysis is largely unknown.Our group has been interested in advancing the chemistry of iodanyl radicals as intermediates in the sustainable synthesis of hypervalent I(III) and I(V) compounds and as novel platforms for substrate activation at open-shell main-group intermediates. In 2018, we disclosed the first example of aerobic hypervalent iodine catalysis by intercepting reactive intermediates in aldehyde autoxidation chemistry. While we initially hypothesized that the observed oxidation was accomplished by aerobically generated peracids via a two-electron I(I)-to-I(III) oxidation reaction, detailed mechanistic studies revealed the critical role of acetate-stabilized iodanyl radical intermediates. We subsequently leveraged these mechanistic insights to develop hypervalent iodine electrocatalysis. Our studies resulted in the identification of new catalyst design principles that give rise to highly efficient organoiodide electrocatalysts that operate at modest applied potentials. These advances addressed classical challenges in hypervalent iodine electrocatalysis related to the need for high applied potentials and high catalyst loadings. In some cases, we were able to isolate the anodically generated iodanyl radical intermediates, which allowed direct interrogation of the elementary chemical reactions characteristic of iodanyl radicals. Both substrate activation via bidirectional proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions at I(II) intermediates and disproportionation reactions of I(II) species to generate I(III) compounds have been experimentally validated.This Account discusses the emerging synthetic and catalytic chemistry of iodanyl radicals. Results from our group have demonstrated that these open-shell species can play a critical role in sustainable synthesis of hypervalent iodine reagents and play a heretofore unappreciated role in catalysis. Realization of I(I)/I(II) catalytic cycles as a mechanistic alternative to canonical two-electron iodine redox chemistry promises to open new avenues to application of organoiodides in catalysis.
概要高价碘试剂在各种氧化转化中可用作选择性化学氧化剂。这些试剂的用途通常归因于:(1)倾向于进行选择性的两电子氧化还原转化;(2)在三中心、四电子(3c-4e)高价碘-配体(I-X)键中易于配体交换;(3)芳基碘化物的高亲核性。单电子氧化还原和碘自由基化学在无机高价碘化学的背景下是很好的先例——例如,在驱动染料敏化太阳能电池的碘化物-三碘化物对中。相比之下,有机高价碘化学在历史上一直由两电子 I(I)/I(III)和 I(III)/I(V)氧化还原对主导,这是由于中间奇数电子物种的固有不稳定性所致。通过高价碘-X 键的还原活化生成的瞬态碘酰基自由基(即,形式上为 I(II)物种),最近作为高价碘化学中的潜在中间体引起了关注。重要的是,这些开壳中间体通常通过化学计量高价碘试剂的活化生成,而碘酰基自由基在底物功能化和催化中的作用在很大程度上是未知的。我们小组一直对推进碘酰基自由基作为高价 I(III)和 I(V)化合物可持续合成中的中间体以及作为开壳主族中间体底物活化的新平台的化学感兴趣。2018 年,我们披露了通过拦截醛自氧化化学中反应性中间体实现有氧高价碘催化的第一个例子。虽然我们最初假设观察到的氧化是通过有氧生成的过酸通过两电子 I(I)到 I(III)氧化反应来完成的,但详细的机理研究揭示了乙酸盐稳定的碘酰基自由基中间体的关键作用。随后,我们利用这些机理见解来开发高价碘电化学催化。我们的研究确定了新的催化剂设计原则,这些原则导致了在适度施加电势下操作的高效有机碘化物电催化剂。这些进展解决了与高价碘电化学催化相关的经典挑战,这些挑战涉及需要高施加电势和高催化剂负载。在某些情况下,我们能够分离出阳极产生的碘酰基自由基中间体,这允许直接研究碘酰基自由基特征的基本化学反应。通过 I(II)中间体的双向质子耦合电子转移(PCET)反应进行的底物活化和 I(II)物种的歧化反应以生成 I(III)化合物都已通过实验验证。本账户讨论了碘酰基自由基的新兴合成和催化化学。我们小组的研究结果表明,这些开壳物种可以在高价碘试剂的可持续合成中发挥关键作用,并在催化中发挥迄今为止未被重视的作用。作为对经典两电子碘氧化还原化学的机制替代,实现 I(I)/I(II)催化循环有望为有机碘化物在催化中的应用开辟新途径。