Eustache Francis, Peschanski Denis
U1077, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine (NIMH), Inserm, EPHE-PSL, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, France.
Centre Européen de Sociologie et de Science Politique, UMR8209 (CNRS, Université Paris 1, EHESS), Paris, France.
Biol Aujourdhui. 2023;217(1-2):39-48. doi: 10.1051/jbio/2023016. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
The purpose of this article is to present the evolution of scientific work on human memory from the end of the 19th century. The work of experimental psychology and neuropsychology first dominated the scientific scene. Research in the humanities and social sciences was established in the interwar period, but without any real interaction with psychology and neurosciences. We recall the most emblematic historical works of two distinct visions of memory: those of the experimental psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus who measured memory, on himself, from lists of meaningless syllables, and those of the sociologist Maurice Halbwachs for whom any act of memory is a social act. This disciplinary closure persisted until the end of the 20th century. A real social shift has taken place since the 2000s, with a desire to studying and understanding the interactions between individual and collective memories. In this article, the authors argue for the emergence of "sciences of memory" based on dialectic and transdisciplinarity. They draw on the Programme 13-Novembre that is emblematic of this evolution. The Programme 13-Novembre has seized upon a diversity of research tools on memory by applying them to a traumatic event in French society: the attacks of 13 November 2015 in Paris and its immediate suburbs. Its genesis, its overall architecture and several of its components are presented here, as well as a few results already published. In addition to its theoretical scope, this work has many possible applications, particularly in the understanding and management of various pathologies, post-traumatic stress disorder being the most demonstrative in this respect.
本文旨在呈现自19世纪末以来关于人类记忆的科学研究的演变。实验心理学和神经心理学的研究最初主导了科学领域。人文和社会科学的研究在两次世界大战之间的时期得以确立,但与心理学和神经科学没有任何实际的互动。我们回顾了关于记忆的两种不同观点中最具代表性的历史著作:实验心理学家赫尔曼·艾宾浩斯通过对自己记忆无意义音节列表的测试来测量记忆,以及社会学家莫里斯·哈布瓦赫认为任何记忆行为都是一种社会行为。这种学科封闭一直持续到20世纪末。自21世纪以来,发生了一场真正的社会转变,人们渴望研究和理解个体记忆与集体记忆之间的相互作用。在本文中,作者主张基于辩证法和跨学科性的“记忆科学”的出现。他们借鉴了象征这一演变的“11月13日计划”。“11月13日计划”通过将多种记忆研究工具应用于法国社会的一个创伤性事件:2015年11月13日在巴黎及其近郊发生的袭击事件,从而利用了这些工具。这里介绍了该计划的起源、总体架构及其几个组成部分,以及一些已经发表的成果。除了其理论范围外,这项工作还有许多可能的应用,特别是在理解和管理各种病理方面,创伤后应激障碍在这方面最为典型。