• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑全生命周期环境影响和区域差异的中国农村污水处理设施适宜性评价

Suitability evaluation of rural sewage treatment facilities in China considering lifcycle environmental impacts and regional differences.

机构信息

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118516. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118516. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118516
PMID:37413733
Abstract

Centralized vs. decentralized sewage treatment is one of the key issues in the planning of rural sewage treatment (RST) in China due to the country's diverse regional characteristics. There are very limited comprehensive evaluation models for selecting regionally suitable schemes and facilities, particularly for national or provisional scale planning. As a scenario-based multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) issue, this paper develops a novel RST suitability evaluation model by integrating the multi-attribute analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). The suitability evaluation model sets up 3 small-centralized and 4 decentralized RST facilities as candidates and includes 12 evaluation indicators that cover economic cost, life cycle environmental impacts, technical features and operations management. Eight generic scenarios are classified for Chinese rural areas based on differences in three major characteristic factors, i.e., population density (PD), the economic development level (EDL), and topographic slope (TS). The universal evaluation results show that a centralized sewage treatment scheme is more suitable for areas with a high PD/high EDL/low TS, while a decentralized scheme is more suitable for areas with a low PD/low EDL/high TS. Sensitivity analysis shows that in regions with a high PD/low EDL, the indicator weight of the construction investment cost in the model has a great influence on the facility suitability ranking. However, in regions with a high PD/high EDL, the ranking is the most sensitive to the indicator weights of the global warming potential and sewage treatment effect. Furthermore, as a spatial decision issue, an RST suitability map of Hunan Province in China is produced at the county level of resolution, and the map is generally consistent with our field knowledge of several counties in Hunan Province. The presented evaluation framework can be integrated into environmental decision support systems in the future to help local and central governments, water utilities, design institutes and other stakeholders scientifically plan RST projects.

摘要

集中式与分散式污水处理是中国农村污水处理规划(RST)的关键问题之一,这是由于中国地域特征多样所致。对于选择区域适用的方案和设施,特别是对于国家或临时规模的规划,非常缺乏全面的综合评价模型。作为基于情景的多属性决策(MADM)问题,本文通过将多属性层次分析法(AHP)与逼近理想解的排序技术(TOPSIS)相结合,开发了一种新颖的 RST 适宜性评价模型。该适宜性评价模型设置了 3 个小型集中式和 4 个分散式 RST 设施作为候选,并包含了 12 个评价指标,涵盖了经济成本、生命周期环境影响、技术特点和运营管理。根据人口密度(PD)、经济发展水平(EDL)和地形坡度(TS)三个主要特征因素的差异,将中国农村地区分为 8 个通用情景。普遍的评价结果表明,集中式污水处理方案更适合 PD 高/EDL 高/LTS 低的地区,而分散式方案更适合 PD 低/EDL 低/LTS 高的地区。敏感性分析表明,在 PD 高/EDL 低的地区,模型中建设投资成本的指标权重对设施适宜性排名有很大影响。然而,在 PD 高/EDL 高的地区,排名对全球变暖潜势和污水处理效果的指标权重最为敏感。此外,作为一个空间决策问题,生成了中国湖南省的 RST 适宜性图,该图在县级分辨率上,与我们对湖南省几个县的实地知识大体一致。所提出的评价框架可以集成到未来的环境决策支持系统中,以帮助地方和中央政府、水务公司、设计机构和其他利益相关者科学地规划 RST 项目。

相似文献

1
Suitability evaluation of rural sewage treatment facilities in China considering lifcycle environmental impacts and regional differences.考虑全生命周期环境影响和区域差异的中国农村污水处理设施适宜性评价
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118516. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118516. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Optimal Selection of Sewage Treatment Technologies in Town Areas: A Coupled Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model.城镇污水处理技术的优化选择:一个耦合的多准则决策模型。
Environ Manage. 2020 Oct;66(4):709-721. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01338-w. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
3
[Evaluation and Optimization of Rural Sewage Treatment Technologies in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on Group Decision Making and Analytic Hierarchy Process].基于群决策和层次分析法的长江中游农村污水处理技术评价与优化
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1191-1200. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203043.
4
Performance evaluation of the emerging rural sewage treatment facilities in China.中国新兴农村污水处理设施的性能评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51623-51634. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19467-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
5
Effect evaluation of decentralized domestic sewage treatment facilities in rural areas - a case study of Nantong City, China.农村分散式生活污水处理设施效果评估——以中国南通市为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2023 Aug;88(3):711-722. doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.208.
6
Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.运用层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法(FTOPSIS)与地理信息系统(GIS)集成进行卫生填埋场选址:印度梅马里市的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):7528-7550. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11004-7. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
A method for determining the optimal number and location of biomass energy facilities.一种确定生物质能源设施最佳数量和位置的方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 15;348:119313. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119313. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Evaluation and obstacle analysis of sustainable development in small towns based on multi-source big data: A case study of 782 top small towns in China.基于多源大数据的小城镇可持续发展评价与障碍分析——以中国 782 个顶尖小城镇为例。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121847. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121847. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
9
Implementation of pollution source assessment and treatment strategy for plateau railway construction in China: an AHP-cloud model approach.中国高原铁路建设污染源评价与治理策略的实施:基于层次分析法-云模型的方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 May 29;195(6):749. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11286-7.
10
A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.三种土地适宜性评价多准则决策方法的比较分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Aug 8;194(9):657. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10259-6.