Ha Seungman, Jeong Byongug, Jang Hayoung, Park Chybyung, Ku Byungchurl
Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK; Korean Register, 36 Myeongji Ocean City 9-ro, Gangseo-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea; Europe-Korea Marine and Ocean Engineers Association (EKMOA), 90 Cowley Close, Southampton, Hants SO16 9WE, UK.
Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK; Europe-Korea Marine and Ocean Engineers Association (EKMOA), 90 Cowley Close, Southampton, Hants SO16 9WE, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 1;897:165366. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165366. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
This research was motivated to address limitations in the current lifecycle assessment frameworks with the absence of proper guidelines for developing default lifecycle values of energies in consideration of supply chain activities and maritime transportation. Given this, it aims to evaluate the level of life cycle GHG emissions of heavy fuel oil, LNG, LPG and methanol as marine fuels produced and supplied in energy import-dependent countries, using South Korea as a case study. The analysis clearly shows that the impact of international shipping on Well-to-Tank (WtT) GHG emissions for energy carriers would be subject to several factors: propulsion system types, the quantify of energy transported, and the routes and distances of voyages. For instance, transportation emissions from LNG carriers for LNG fuel vary significantly depending on the country of import, ranging from 2.26 g CO eq./MJ (representing 12.2 % of Well-to-Tank (WtT) emissions for Malaysia) to 5.97 g CO eq./MJ (representing 33.3 % of WtT emissions for Qatar). As a preliminary study, an enhancement on the quality of the input/inventory data is imperative for obtaining a reliability of results. Nevertheless, the comparative analysis of different fuels and life stages provides valuable insights for stakeholders to develop effective policies and energy refueling plans for reducing life cycle GHG emissions from marine fuels. These findings could also enhance the current regulatory framework and provide meaningful lifecycle carbon footprints of marine fuels for energy importing countries. The study results also strongly suggest that default values of GHG emission for different countries relying on energy imports via international maritime transport should be further developed in consideration of the impact of regional differences, such as distance, from the importing country for successful arrival of LCA application on marine industry.
本研究旨在解决当前生命周期评估框架中的局限性,因为缺乏在考虑供应链活动和海上运输的情况下制定能源默认生命周期值的适当指南。鉴于此,它旨在以韩国为例,评估在能源进口依赖型国家生产和供应的重质燃料油、液化天然气、液化石油气和甲醇作为船用燃料的生命周期温室气体排放水平。分析清楚地表明,国际航运对能源载体的从井口到油箱(WtT)温室气体排放的影响将受到几个因素的制约:推进系统类型、运输的能源数量以及航程的路线和距离。例如,液化天然气船运输液化天然气燃料产生的排放因进口国而异,范围从2.26克二氧化碳当量/兆焦(占马来西亚WtT排放的12.2%)到5.97克二氧化碳当量/兆焦(占卡塔尔WtT排放的33.3%)。作为一项初步研究,提高输入/清单数据的质量对于获得结果的可靠性至关重要。尽管如此,对不同燃料和生命周期阶段的比较分析为利益相关者制定有效的政策和能源加注计划以减少船用燃料的生命周期温室气体排放提供了有价值的见解。这些发现还可以加强当前的监管框架,并为能源进口国提供有意义的船用燃料生命周期碳足迹。研究结果还强烈表明,考虑到区域差异(如距离)对从进口国成功抵达的影响,应进一步制定依赖国际海上运输进口能源的不同国家的温室气体排放默认值,以便生命周期评估在海洋行业成功应用。