Capital Medical University Forth Clinical School, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):228-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112135. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
To evaluate the effect and safety of acupuncture for acute migraine attacks in adults.
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE(OVID), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database and Wanfang database from inception to 15 July 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in Chinese and English comparing acupuncture alone against sham acupuncture/placebo/no treatment/pharmacological therapy or comparing acupuncture plus pharmacological therapy against the same pharmacological therapy. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes or mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% CIs. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool and the certainty of the evidence (CoE) with GRADE. : Main outcome measures : a) The rate of headache freedom (pain score=0) at 2h after the treatment; b) the rate of headache relief (at least 50% reduction of pain score); c) headache intensity at 2h after the treatment(study data from scales measuring pain intensity, including visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale) d) the improvement of headache intensity at 2h after the treatment; e) the improvement values of migraine-associated symptoms; f) adverse events.
We included 21 RCTs from 15 studies with 1926 participants comparing acupuncture against other interventions. Comparing to sham acupuncture or placebo, acupuncture may result in an increase in the rate of headache freedom (RR 6.03, 95% CI 1.62 to 22.41, 180 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE) and the improvement of headache intensity (MD 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.85, 375 participants, 5 studies, I=13%, moderate CoE) at 2 hours after treatment. It also may result on a higher rate of headache relief (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.49, 179 participants,3 studies, I=74%, very low CoE) and greater improvement of migraine-associated symptoms (MD 0.97, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.61, 90 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, very low CoE) at 2 hours after treatment but the evidence is very uncertain. Meanwhile the analysis indicates acupuncture probably results in little to no difference in adverse events compared with sham acupuncture (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.87, 884 participants, 10 studies, I=0%, moderate CoE). In acupuncture plus pharmacological intervention versus the same pharmacological intervention, acupuncture plus pharmacological therapy may result in little to no difference in the rate of headache freedom (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.42, 94 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE), the rate of headache relief (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.57, 94 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE) at 2 hours after treatment and adverse events(RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 8.92, 94 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE). However, it may result in a reduction in headache intensity (MD -1.05, 95% CI -1.49 to -0.62, 129 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE) and an increase in the improvement of headache intensity (MD 1.18, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.95, 94 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, low CoE) at 2 hours after treatment compared with pharmacological therapy only. In comparison to pharmacological intervention, acupuncture may result in little to no difference in the rate of headache freedom (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.52, 294 participants, 4 studies, I=22%, low CoE), the rate of headache relief (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14, 206 participants, 3 studies. I=0%, low CoE) at 2 hours and adverse events (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.22, 294 participants, 4 studies, I=0%, low CoE) after treatment. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on the headache intensity (MD -0.07, 95% CI -1.11 to 0.98, 641 participants, 5 studies, I=98%, very low CoE) and the improvement of headache intensity (MD -0.32, 95% CI -1.07 to 0.42, 95 participants, 2 studies, I=0%, very low CoE) at 2 hours after treatment compared with pharmacological intervention.
The body of evidence suggests that acupuncture may be more effective than sham acupuncture in the treatment of migraine. Acupuncture may also be as effective as pharmacological therapy. However, the certainty evidence across outcomes was low to very low and new high-quality studies can provide more clarity.
CRD42014013352.
为评估针刺治疗成人急性偏头痛发作的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了 PubMed、MEDLINE(OVID)、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国国家知识基础设施、中国科技期刊数据库和万方数据库,检索时间为 2022 年 7 月 15 日。纳入比较针刺与假针刺/安慰剂/无治疗/药物治疗或针刺联合药物治疗与相同药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果以二分类结局的风险比(RR)或连续结局的均数差(MD)表示,置信区间(CI)为 95%。使用 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险,使用 GRADE 评估证据确定性。
a)治疗后 2 小时头痛缓解率(疼痛评分=0);b)治疗后 2 小时头痛缓解率(疼痛评分至少降低 50%);c)治疗后 2 小时头痛强度(研究数据来自疼痛强度量表,包括视觉模拟量表、数字评分量表);d)治疗后 2 小时头痛强度改善;e)偏头痛相关症状改善值;f)不良事件。
我们纳入了 15 项研究的 21 项 RCT,共纳入 1926 名参与者,比较针刺与其他干预措施。与假针刺或安慰剂相比,针刺可能增加治疗后 2 小时头痛缓解率(RR 6.03,95%CI 1.62-22.41,180 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)和头痛强度改善(MD 0.51,95%CI 0.16-0.85,375 名参与者,5 项研究,I=13%,中质量证据)。针刺也可能提高治疗后 2 小时头痛缓解率(RR 2.29,95%CI 1.16-4.49,179 名参与者,3 项研究,I=74%,极低质量证据)和偏头痛相关症状改善(MD 0.97,95%CI 0.33-1.61,90 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,极低质量证据),但证据极不确定。同时,分析表明针刺与假针刺相比,不良事件发生率可能差异无统计学意义(RR 1.53,95%CI 0.82-2.87,884 名参与者,10 项研究,I=0%,中质量证据)。在针刺联合药物治疗与相同药物治疗的比较中,针刺联合药物治疗可能对头痛缓解率(RR 1.55,95%CI 0.99-2.42,94 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)、头痛缓解率(RR 1.20,95%CI 0.91-1.57,94 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)和不良事件(RR 1.48,95%CI 0.25-8.92,94 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)无差异,但可能降低头痛强度(MD-1.05,95%CI-1.49-0.62,129 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)和头痛强度改善(MD 1.18,95%CI 0.41-1.95,94 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)。与药物治疗相比,针刺可能对头痛缓解率(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.59-1.52,294 名参与者,4 项研究,I=22%,低质量证据)、头痛缓解率(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.80-1.14,206 名参与者,3 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)和不良事件(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.35-1.22,294 名参与者,4 项研究,I=0%,低质量证据)无差异,证据极不确定。针刺对头痛强度(MD-0.07,95%CI-1.11-0.98,641 名参与者,5 项研究,I=98%,极低质量证据)和头痛强度改善(MD-0.32,95%CI-1.07-0.42,95 名参与者,2 项研究,I=0%,极低质量证据)的影响的证据质量非常低。
现有证据表明,针刺可能比假针刺更有效治疗偏头痛。针刺也可能与药物治疗一样有效。然而,所有结局的证据确定性均较低至极低,新的高质量研究可能提供更明确的证据。
CRD42014013352。