• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于选择长期浪漫伴侣的文献综述述评

A Critical Review of the Literature Regarding the Selection of Long-Term Romantic Partners.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Oct;52(7):3025-3042. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02646-y. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-023-02646-y
PMID:37420089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10684645/
Abstract

Research regarding how people choose their long-term romantic partners is extensive, but the understanding of the psychological processes behind these choices, and predicting who people choose, is elusive. This review attempts to examine potential reasons for this elusive nature by first outlining the current state of the literature and then highlighting issues within the current paradigm. First among these issues is a focus on singular perspectives and little attempt to integrate these perspectives with others. Second, many studies focus on increasingly complex designs to explore the predictive utility of trait preferences, attempts which have had only limited success. Third, novel findings appear to be unintegrated with established findings, leaving the potential combination of these ideas unrealized. Finally, long-term romantic partner selection is a complex psychological phenomenon, but current theory and research methodologies are not sufficiently addressing this complexity. This review concludes with suggestions for future research direction, including a focus on the psychology behind the partner selection process and the potential of qualitative enquiry to reveal novel pathways behind these psychological processes. There is a need for an integrative framework that permits the coexistence of established and novel ideas, and multiple perspectives, from both current and future research paradigms.

摘要

关于人们如何选择长期浪漫伴侣的研究已经很广泛了,但对于这些选择背后的心理过程的理解,以及对人们选择对象的预测,仍然难以捉摸。本综述试图通过首先概述当前文献的状况,然后突出当前范式内的问题,来检验这种难以捉摸的性质的潜在原因。首先,这些问题中存在的一个焦点是单一视角,很少试图将这些视角与其他视角结合起来。其次,许多研究关注越来越复杂的设计,以探索特质偏好的预测效用,这些尝试仅取得了有限的成功。第三,新的发现似乎与已建立的发现没有融合,使得这些想法的潜在组合没有实现。最后,长期浪漫伴侣的选择是一个复杂的心理现象,但当前的理论和研究方法并没有充分解决这种复杂性。本综述最后提出了未来研究方向的建议,包括关注伴侣选择过程背后的心理学,以及定性研究可能揭示这些心理过程背后的新途径。需要一个综合框架,允许现有和新思想以及来自当前和未来研究范式的多种观点共存。

相似文献

1
A Critical Review of the Literature Regarding the Selection of Long-Term Romantic Partners.关于选择长期浪漫伴侣的文献综述述评
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Oct;52(7):3025-3042. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02646-y. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Consistency and inconsistency among romantic partners over time.伴侣间随时间推移的一致性和非一致性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;112(6):838-859. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000087. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.在婚姻市场上的欧几里得匹配值和选择力。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;44(2):252-264. doi: 10.1177/0146167217739262. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
4
Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.对温暖-可信赖特质的配偶偏好预示着在配偶选择早期阶段的浪漫吸引力以及恋爱关系中的满意度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Feb;46(2):298-311. doi: 10.1177/0146167219855048. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.对浪漫伴侣的身体吸引力的内隐和外显偏好:预测有效性的双重分离。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):993-1011. doi: 10.1037/a0024061.
6
Weight conversations in romantic relationships: What do they sound like and how do partners respond?浪漫关系中的体重话题:听起来是怎样的,伴侣又如何回应?
Fam Syst Health. 2016 Sep;34(3):213-220. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000223. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
Shared social and emotional activities within adolescent romantic and non-romantic sexual relationships.青少年浪漫和非浪漫性关系中的共同社交和情感活动。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 May;42(4):649-58. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0043-3. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Romantic relationships and sexual activities of the first generation of youth living with HIV since birth.自出生起就感染艾滋病毒的第一代青年的恋爱关系和性活动。
AIDS Care. 2011 Apr;23(4):393-400. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.516332.
9
Review of the Experience of Weight-Based Stigmatization in Romantic Relationships.体重歧视在恋爱关系中的体验综述。
Curr Obes Rep. 2020 Sep;9(3):280-287. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00383-0.
10
Machiavellianism in long-term relationships: Competition, mate retention and sexual coercion.长期关系中的马基雅维利主义:竞争、配偶保留与性胁迫。
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Jun;56(3):357-62. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12200. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences: An Exploration of Similarities, Differences, and Potential Explanations.浪漫伴侣选择经历中的多元性别与性取向认同:相似性、差异及潜在解释探究
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03173-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Evolutionary Psychology Should Abandon Modularity.为什么进化心理学应该摒弃模块性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;17(2):465-490. doi: 10.1177/1745691621997113. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Curvilinear Sexism and Its Links to Men's Perceived Mate Value.曲线性别歧视及其与男性感知配偶价值的联系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Apr;48(4):516-533. doi: 10.1177/01461672211009726. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Couple Simulation: A Novel Approach for Evaluating Models of Human Mate Choice.夫妻模拟:一种评估人类配偶选择模型的新方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2021 Aug;25(3):191-228. doi: 10.1177/1088868320971258. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Sexual identities and reproductive orientations: Coming out as wanting (or not wanting) to have children.性身份与生育取向:公开表明想要(或不想要)孩子。
Sexualities. 2021 Feb;24(1-2):276-294. doi: 10.1177/1363460720926967. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.机器学习揭示了 43 项纵向夫妻研究中最稳健的关系质量自我报告预测因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.人类地位标准:14 个国家的性别差异和相似性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):979-998. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000206. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Reconsidering "Best Practices" for Testing the Ideal Standards Model: A Response to Eastwick, Finkel, and Simpson (2018).重新思考测试理想标准模型的“最佳实践”:对 Eastwick、Finkel 和 Simpson(2018)的回应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Nov;46(11):1581-1595. doi: 10.1177/0146167220910323. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Single dose testosterone administration increases men's facial femininity preference in a Chinese population.单次睾酮给药增加了中国男性对女性化面孔的偏好。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 May;115:104630. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104630. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.45 个国家的配偶偏好整合对比计算模型
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 15;9(1):16885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52748-8.
10
Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model.中西方择偶偏好优先级:择偶偏好优先模型的跨文化检验。
J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):606-620. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12514. Epub 2019 Sep 13.