• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中西方择偶偏好优先级:择偶偏好优先模型的跨文化检验。

Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):606-620. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12514. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1111/jopy.12514
PMID:31494937
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mate choice involves trading-off several preferences. Research on this process tends to examine mate preference prioritization in homogenous samples using a small number of traits and thus provide little insight into whether prioritization patterns reflect a universal human nature. This study examined whether prioritization patterns, and their accompanying sex differences, are consistent across Eastern and Western cultures.

METHOD

In the largest test of the mate preference priority model to date, we asked an international sample of participants (N = 2,477) to design an ideal long-term partner by allocating mate dollars to eight traits using three budgets. Unlike previous versions of the task, we included traits known to vary in importance by culture (e.g., religiosity and chastity).

RESULTS

Under low budget conditions, Eastern and Western participants differed in their mate dollar allocation for almost every trait (average d = 0.42), indicating that culture influences prioritization. Despite these differences, traits fundamental for the reproductive success of each sex in the ancestral environment were prioritized by both Eastern and Western participants.

CONCLUSION

The tendency to prioritize reproductively fundamental traits is present in both Eastern and Western cultures. The psychological mechanisms responsible for this process produce similar prioritization patterns despite cross-cultural variation.

摘要

目的

择偶涉及权衡几个偏好。关于这个过程的研究倾向于使用少数特征在同质样本中检查配偶偏好的优先级排序,因此几乎无法深入了解优先级排序模式是否反映出普遍的人性。本研究考察了优先排序模式及其伴随的性别差异是否在东方和西方文化中一致。

方法

在迄今为止对配偶偏好优先级模型的最大测试中,我们要求国际参与者样本(N=2477)通过使用三个预算将配偶美元分配给八个特征来设计理想的长期伴侣。与之前版本的任务不同,我们包括了已知因文化而异的特征(例如宗教信仰和贞操)。

结果

在低预算条件下,东方和西方参与者在几乎每个特征上的配偶美元分配都存在差异(平均 d=0.42),这表明文化会影响优先级排序。尽管存在这些差异,但对于每个性别在祖先环境中的生殖成功至关重要的特征都被东方和西方参与者所优先考虑。

结论

在东方和西方文化中都存在优先考虑生殖基本特征的趋势。负责这一过程的心理机制尽管存在跨文化差异,但仍会产生类似的优先级排序模式。

相似文献

1
Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model.中西方择偶偏好优先级:择偶偏好优先模型的跨文化检验。
J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):606-620. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12514. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.45 个国家的配偶偏好整合对比计算模型
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 15;9(1):16885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52748-8.
3
Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.挪威男女在短期关系中看重相似的伴侣特征。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):1474704920979623. doi: 10.1177/1474704920979623.
4
The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.情妇关系的要点:性别差异的配偶偏好反映了交配理想的一种妥协。
J Pers. 2023 Apr;91(2):383-399. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12734. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.伊朗长期配偶偏好评估
Evol Psychol. 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):1474704917702459. doi: 10.1177/1474704917702459.
6
Environmental influences on mate preferences as assessed by a scenario manipulation experiment.通过情景操作实验评估环境对配偶偏好的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 12;8(9):e74282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074282. eCollection 2013.
7
Assessing implicit mate preferences among Chinese and Japanese women by providing love, sex, or money cues.通过提供爱情、性或金钱线索来评估中国和日本女性潜在的配偶偏好。
Psychol Rep. 2015 Feb;116(1):195-206. doi: 10.2466/21.PR0.116k11w6. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.自评吸引力调节女性黑暗人格特质与浪漫理想之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2018 Feb;121(1):184-200. doi: 10.1177/0033294117738021. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Looks and status are still essential: Testing the mate preference priority model with the profile-based experimental paradigm.外表和地位仍然很重要:基于档案的实验范式检验配偶偏好优先模型。
J Pers. 2022 Dec;90(6):821-845. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12699. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
10
In-Law and Mate Preferences in Chinese Society and the Role of Traditional Cultural Values.中国社会中的姻亲与配偶偏好及传统文化价值观的作用
Evol Psychol. 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1474704917730518. doi: 10.1177/1474704917730518.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual partner number and distribution over time affect long-term partner evaluation: evidence from 11 countries across 5 continents.性伴侣数量及随时间的分布情况会影响对长期伴侣的评价:来自五大洲11个国家的证据。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 31;15(1):27947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12607-1.
2
Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences: An Exploration of Similarities, Differences, and Potential Explanations.浪漫伴侣选择经历中的多元性别与性取向认同:相似性、差异及潜在解释探究
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03173-8.
3
Choosiness as a Predictor of Sexual (In)frequency in Single Heterosexual Adults.
挑剔作为单身异性恋成年人性行为(不)频繁程度的预测指标
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03160-z.
4
The Influence of Mating Context on Creativity: Insights from Simulated Dating Scenarios.交配情境对创造力的影响:来自模拟约会场景的见解。
Evol Psychol. 2025 Apr-Jun;23(2):14747049251337983. doi: 10.1177/14747049251337983. Epub 2025 May 19.
5
Observed Aspects of Mate Value and Sociosexuality Account for Mate Preferences: Data from a Large, Representative Study from Czechia.配偶价值和社会性取向的观察方面解释了配偶偏好:来自捷克的一项大型代表性研究的数据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jan;54(1):309-322. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03010-4. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
6
Strategies for becoming a more desirable mate: evidence from Lithuania.成为更具吸引力伴侣的策略:来自立陶宛的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1437393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437393. eCollection 2024.
7
An investigation of the direct and indirect effects of desire for independence and perceived level of achievement on singlehood status.对独立愿望和感知成就水平对单身状态的直接和间接影响的调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 11;14(1):23803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75086-w.
8
Mate Choice Plurality, Choice Overload, and Singlehood: Are More Options Always Better?配偶选择的多样性、选择过载与单身状态:选择更多就总是更好吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;14(8):703. doi: 10.3390/bs14080703.
9
Testing Sexual Strategy Theory in Norway.在挪威检验性策略理论。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):438. doi: 10.3390/bs14060438.
10
What Do Different People Look for in a Partner? Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Mating Strategies on Partner Preferences.不同的人在伴侣身上寻找什么?性别、性取向和交配策略对伴侣偏好的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):981-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02767-4. Epub 2024 Feb 27.