• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家用血压设备制造商之间的袖带尺寸差异:当前患者的困境。

Cuff Size Variation Across Manufacturers of Home Blood Pressure Devices: A Current Patient Dilemma.

机构信息

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2023 Sep 15;36(10):532-535. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad060.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpad060
PMID:37422909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends cuff sizes of blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices based on patient arm circumference, which is critical for accurate BP measurement. This study aimed to assess cuff size variation across validated BP devices and to examine the degree of alignment with the AHA recommendations.

METHODS

Data on home BP devices were obtained from the US BP Validated Device Listing website and listed cuff sizes were compared against AHA recommendations: small adult (22-26 cm), adult (27-34 cm), large (35-44 cm), and extra-large (XL) (45-52 cm).

RESULTS

There were 42 home validated BP devices from 13 manufacturers, and none offered cuffs that were aligned with the AHA recommendations. Over half of the devices (22, 52.4%) were compatible with only a broad-range cuff, generally excluding arm sizes larger than 44 cm. Only 5 devices from 4 manufacturers offered a cuff labeled "XL," and of these, only 3 devices had sizes that covered the AHA XL range. Terminology lacked consistency with manufacturers using: different labels to describe the same-sized cuffs (e.g., 22-42 cm was labeled "integrated," "standard," "adult," "large," and "wide range"); the same labels to describe differently sized cuffs (e.g., cuffs labeled "large" were sized 22-42 cm, 32-38 cm, 32-42 cm, 36-45 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Manufacturers of US home BP devices employ inconsistent terminologies and thresholds for cuff sizes, and sizes were not aligned with AHA recommendations. This lack of standardization could pose challenges for clinicians and patients attempting to select a properly sized cuff to support hypertension diagnosis and management.

摘要

背景

美国心脏协会(AHA)根据患者臂围推荐血压(BP)监测设备的袖带尺寸,这对准确测量血压至关重要。本研究旨在评估经过验证的 BP 设备的袖带尺寸变化,并检查与 AHA 建议的一致性程度。

方法

从美国 BP 验证设备清单网站获取家用 BP 设备的数据,并将列出的袖带尺寸与 AHA 建议进行比较:小成人(22-26cm)、成人(27-34cm)、大(35-44cm)和特大(XL)(45-52cm)。

结果

共有 13 家制造商的 42 种家用经验证的 BP 设备,没有一种设备的袖带与 AHA 建议一致。超过一半的设备(22,52.4%)仅与宽范围袖带兼容,通常排除臂围大于 44cm 的尺寸。只有 4 家制造商的 5 种设备提供标有“XL”的袖带,其中只有 3 种设备的尺寸涵盖了 AHA XL 范围。制造商使用的术语缺乏一致性:用不同的标签来描述相同尺寸的袖带(例如,22-42cm 被标记为“集成”、“标准”、“成人”、“大”和“宽范围”);用相同的标签来描述不同尺寸的袖带(例如,标有“大”的袖带尺寸为 22-42cm、32-38cm、32-42cm、36-45cm)。

结论

美国家用 BP 设备制造商使用的袖带尺寸术语和阈值不一致,并且尺寸与 AHA 建议不一致。这种缺乏标准化可能会给试图选择合适尺寸袖带以支持高血压诊断和管理的临床医生和患者带来挑战。

相似文献

1
Cuff Size Variation Across Manufacturers of Home Blood Pressure Devices: A Current Patient Dilemma.家用血压设备制造商之间的袖带尺寸差异:当前患者的困境。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Sep 15;36(10):532-535. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad060.
2
Blood Pressure Cuff Sizes for Pregnant Women in the United States: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国孕妇血压袖带尺寸:来自国家健康与营养检查调查的结果。
Am J Hypertens. 2024 Dec 16;38(1):12-17. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae128.
3
One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.一刀切并不适合所有人:大臂围的人使用通用袖带会高估示波法血压。
Blood Press. 2024 Dec;33(1):2338208. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2338208. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Impact of miscuffing during home blood pressure measurement on the prevalence of masked hypertension.家庭血压测量时袖带绑扎不当对隐匿性高血压患病率的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Oct;26(10):1205-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt084. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
5
Adequacy of validation of wide-range cuffs used with home blood pressure monitors: a systematic review.家用血压监测仪所使用的宽幅袖带验证的充分性:一项系统评价。
Blood Press Monit. 2018 Oct;23(5):219-224. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000344.
6
Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.使用各种臂带选择建议时直接和间接血压测量之间的差异。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):920-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.920.
7
Cuffless Blood Pressure Devices.无袖带血压设备。
Am J Hypertens. 2022 May 10;35(5):380-387. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac017.
8
Office BP measurement using conical cuffs in children and adolescents with obesity.使用锥形袖带在肥胖儿童和青少年中进行诊室血压测量。
Blood Press. 2024 Dec;33(1):2411294. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2411294. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
9
Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.单袖带电子设备在各种手臂尺寸下都能准确测量吗?用于家庭血压监测的Visomat Comfort 20/40设备的验证。
J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Nov;22(11):796-800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
10
Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement.袖带在血压测量中的挑战。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1100-1103. doi: 10.1111/jch.13301.