Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Jul 9;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01133-8.
Interest in home-based stroke rehabilitation mechatronics, which includes both robots and sensor mechanisms, has increased over the past 12 years. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the existing lack of access to rehabilitation for stroke survivors post-discharge. Home-based stroke rehabilitation devices could improve access to rehabilitation for stroke survivors, but the home environment presents unique challenges compared to clinics. The present study undertakes a scoping review of designs for at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation mechatronic devices to identify important design principles and areas for improvement. Online databases were used to identify papers published 2010-2021 describing novel rehabilitation device designs, from which 59 publications were selected describing 38 unique designs. The devices were categorized and listed according to their target anatomy, possible therapy tasks, structure, and features. Twenty-two devices targeted proximal (shoulder and elbow) anatomy, 13 targeted distal (wrist and hand) anatomy, and three targeted the whole arm and hand. Devices with a greater number of actuators in the design were more expensive, with a small number of devices using a mix of actuated and unactuated degrees of freedom to target more complex anatomy while reducing the cost. Twenty-six of the device designs did not specify their target users' function or impairment, nor did they specify a target therapy activity, task, or exercise. Twenty-three of the devices were capable of reaching tasks, 6 of which included grasping capabilities. Compliant structures were the most common approach of including safety features in the design. Only three devices were designed to detect compensation, or undesirable posture, during therapy activities. Six of the 38 device designs mention consulting stakeholders during the design process, only two of which consulted patients specifically. Without stakeholder involvement, these designs risk being disconnected from user needs and rehabilitation best practices. Devices that combine actuated and unactuated degrees of freedom allow a greater variety and complexity of tasks while not significantly increasing their cost. Future home-based upper limb stroke rehabilitation mechatronic designs should provide information on patient posture during task execution, design with specific patient capabilities and needs in mind, and clearly link the features of the design to users' needs.
在过去的 12 年中,人们对包括机器人和传感器机制在内的基于家庭的中风康复机电一体化的兴趣日益增加。COVID-19 大流行加剧了中风幸存者出院后康复服务不足的问题。基于家庭的中风康复设备可以改善中风幸存者的康复机会,但与诊所相比,家庭环境带来了独特的挑战。本研究对家庭上肢中风康复机电一体化设备的设计进行了范围界定综述,以确定重要的设计原则和改进领域。在线数据库被用于确定 2010 年至 2021 年期间发表的描述新型康复设备设计的论文,从中选择了 59 篇描述 38 种独特设计的论文。这些设备根据其目标解剖结构、可能的治疗任务、结构和特点进行分类和列出。22 种设备针对近端(肩部和肘部)解剖结构,13 种针对远端(腕部和手部)解剖结构,3 种针对整个手臂和手部。设计中具有更多致动器的设备价格更高,少数设备使用混合致动和非致动自由度来针对更复杂的解剖结构,同时降低成本。26 种设备设计未指定其目标用户的功能或损伤,也未指定目标治疗活动、任务或锻炼。23 种设备能够完成任务,其中 6 种设备具有抓握能力。顺应性结构是设计中包含安全功能的最常见方法。只有三种设备被设计用来检测治疗活动期间的代偿或不良姿势。38 种设备设计中有 6 种提到在设计过程中咨询利益相关者,但只有 2 种具体咨询了患者。如果没有利益相关者的参与,这些设计可能会与用户需求和康复最佳实践脱节。结合致动和非致动自由度的设备允许更广泛和更复杂的任务,而不会显著增加成本。未来基于家庭的上肢中风康复机电一体化设计应提供有关患者在执行任务期间姿势的信息,根据患者的特定能力和需求进行设计,并将设计的特点与用户的需求明确联系起来。