Garcia-Parraga Daniel, Crespo-Picazo Jose Luis, Sterba-Boatwright Blair, Marco Vicente, Muñoz-Baquero Marta, Robinson Nathan J, Stacy Brian, Fahlman Andreas
Fundación Oceanogràfic de la Comunitat Valenciana, Gran Vía Marqués del Turia 19, 46005 Valencia, Spain.
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA.
Conserv Physiol. 2023 Jul 7;11(1):coad048. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coad048. eCollection 2023.
Tissue and blood gas embolism (GE) associated with fisheries bycatch are likely a widespread, yet underestimated, cause of sea turtle mortality. Here, we evaluated risk factors associated with tissue and blood GE in loggerhead turtles caught incidentally by trawl and gillnet fisheries on the Valencian coastline of Spain. Of 413 turtles (303 caught by trawl, 110 by gillnet fisheries), 54% ( = 222) exhibited GE. For sea turtles caught in trawls, the probability and severity of GE increased with trawl depth and turtle body mass. In addition, trawl depth and the GE score together explained the probability of mortality (P[mortality]) following recompression therapy. Specifically, a turtle with a GE score of 3 caught in a trawl deployed at 110 m had a P[mortality] of ~50%. For turtles caught in gillnets, no risk variables were significantly correlated with either the P[GE] or GE score. However, gillnet depth or GE score, separately, explained P[mortality], and a turtle caught at 45 m or with a GE score between 3 and 4 had a P[mortality] of 50%. Differences in the fishery characteristics precluded direct comparison of GE risk and mortality between these gear types. Although P[mortality] is expected to be significantly higher in untreated turtles released at sea, our findings can improve estimates of sea turtle mortality associated with trawls and gillnets, and help guide associate conservation efforts.
与渔业兼捕相关的组织和血气栓塞(GE)很可能是导致海龟死亡的一个普遍但被低估的原因。在此,我们评估了在西班牙巴伦西亚海岸线被拖网和刺网渔业意外捕获的蠵龟中与组织和血液GE相关的风险因素。在413只海龟(303只被拖网捕获,110只被刺网渔业捕获)中,54%(n = 222)表现出GE。对于被拖网捕获的海龟,GE的概率和严重程度随拖网深度和龟体质量增加。此外,拖网深度和GE评分共同解释了再压缩治疗后的死亡概率(P[死亡率])。具体而言,一只GE评分为3且被拖网捕获于110米深度的海龟,其P[死亡率]约为50%。对于被刺网捕获的海龟,没有风险变量与P[GE]或GE评分显著相关。然而,刺网深度或GE评分分别解释了P[死亡率],一只在45米处捕获或GE评分为3至4的海龟,其P[死亡率]为50%。渔业特征的差异使得无法直接比较这些渔具类型之间的GE风险和死亡率。尽管预计在海上放生的未经处理的海龟中P[死亡率]会显著更高,但我们的研究结果可以改进对与拖网和刺网相关的海龟死亡率的估计,并有助于指导相关的保护工作。