Edelstein Gregory E, Boucau Julie, Uddin Rockib, Marino Caitlin, Liew May Y, Barry Mamadou, Choudhary Manish C, Gilbert Rebecca F, Reynolds Zahra, Li Yijia, Tien Dessie, Sagar Shruti, Vyas Tammy D, Kawano Yumeko, Sparks Jeffrey A, Hammond Sarah P, Wallace Zachary, Vyas Jatin M, Barczak Amy K, Lemieux Jacob E, Li Jonathan Z, Siedner Mark J
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
medRxiv. 2023 Jun 27:2023.06.23.23288598. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.23.23288598.
To compare the frequency of replication-competent virologic rebound with and without nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment for acute COVID-19. Secondary aims were to estimate the validity of symptoms to detect rebound and the incidence of emergent nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations after rebound.
Observational cohort study.
Multicenter healthcare system in Boston, Massachusetts.
We enrolled ambulatory adults with a positive COVID-19 test and/or a prescription for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.
Receipt of 5 days of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment versus no COVID-19 therapy.
The primary outcome was COVID-19 virologic rebound, defined as either (1) a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture following a prior negative culture or (2) two consecutive viral loads ≥4.0 log copies/milliliter after a prior reduction in viral load to <4.0 log copies/milliliter.
Compared with untreated individuals (n=55), those taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (n=72) were older, received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and were more commonly immunosuppressed. Fifteen individuals (20.8%) taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir experienced virologic rebound versus one (1.8%) of the untreated (absolute difference 19.0% [95%CI 9.0-29.0%], P=0.001). In multivariable models, only N-R was associated with VR (AOR 10.02, 95%CI 1.13-88.74). VR occurred more commonly among those with earlier nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation (29.0%, 16.7% and 0% when initiated days 0, 1, and ≥2 after diagnosis, respectively, P=0.089). Among participants on N-R, those experiencing rebound had prolonged shedding of replication-competent virus compared to those that did not rebound (median: 14 vs 3 days). Only 8/16 with virologic rebound reported worsening symptoms (50%, 95%CI 25%-75%); 2 were completely asymptomatic. We detected no post-rebound nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations in the NSP5 protease gene.
Virologic rebound occurred in approximately one in five people taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and often occurred without worsening symptoms. Because it is associated with replication-competent viral shedding, close monitoring and potential isolation of those who rebound should be considered.
比较接受与未接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的急性新冠肺炎患者中具有复制能力的病毒学反弹频率。次要目标是评估症状检测反弹的有效性以及反弹后出现奈玛特韦耐药突变的发生率。
观察性队列研究。
马萨诸塞州波士顿的多中心医疗系统。
我们纳入了新冠病毒检测呈阳性和/或开具了奈玛特韦-利托那韦处方的非卧床成人。
接受5天的奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗与未接受任何新冠肺炎治疗。
主要结局是新冠肺炎病毒学反弹,定义为以下两种情况之一:(1)先前病毒培养阴性后出现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒培养阳性;或(2)先前病毒载量降至<4.0 log拷贝/毫升后,连续两次病毒载量≥4.0 log拷贝/毫升。
与未治疗的个体(n = 55)相比,接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的个体(n = 72)年龄更大,接种新冠肺炎疫苗的次数更多,免疫抑制的情况更常见。接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的15名个体(20.8%)出现病毒学反弹,而未治疗的个体中有1名(1.8%)出现反弹(绝对差异19.0% [95%CI 9.0 - 29.0%],P = 0.001)。在多变量模型中,只有奈玛特韦-利托那韦与病毒学反弹相关(调整后比值比10.02,95%CI 1.13 - 88.74)。病毒学反弹在更早开始使用奈玛特韦-利托那韦的患者中更常见(分别在诊断后第0天、第1天和≥2天开始使用时,发生率为29.0%、16.7%和0%,P = 0.089)。在接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的参与者中,出现反弹的个体与未出现反弹的个体相比,具有复制能力的病毒脱落时间更长(中位数:14天对3天)。在16例病毒学反弹的患者中,只有8例(50%,95%CI 25% - 75%)报告症状加重;2例完全无症状。我们在非结构蛋白5(NSP5)蛋白酶基因中未检测到反弹后的奈玛特韦耐药突变。
接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的患者中,约五分之一出现病毒学反弹,且通常在症状未加重的情况下发生。由于其与具有复制能力的病毒脱落有关,应考虑对反弹患者进行密切监测并可能进行隔离。