Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (G.E.E., Y.K., J.A.S.).
Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.B., C.M.).
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Dec;176(12):1577-1585. doi: 10.7326/M23-1756. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
Data are conflicting regarding an association between treatment of acute COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (N-R) and virologic rebound (VR).
To compare the frequency of VR in patients with and without N-R treatment for acute COVID-19.
Observational cohort study.
Multicenter health care system in Boston, Massachusetts.
Ambulatory adults with acute COVID-19 with and without use of N-R.
Receipt of 5 days of N-R treatment versus no COVID-19 therapy.
The primary outcome was VR, defined as either a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture result after a prior negative result or 2 consecutive viral loads above 4.0 log copies/mL that were also at least 1.0 log copies/mL higher than a prior viral load below 4.0 log copies/mL.
Compared with untreated persons ( = 55), those taking N-R ( = 72) were older, received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and more commonly had immunosuppression. Fifteen participants (20.8%) taking N-R had VR versus 1 (1.8%) who was untreated (absolute difference, 19.0 percentage points [95% CI, 9.0 to 29.0 percentage points]; = 0.001). All persons with VR had a positive viral culture result after a prior negative result. In multivariable models, only N-R use was associated with VR (adjusted odds ratio, 10.02 [CI, 1.13 to 88.74]; = 0.038). Virologic rebound was more common among those who started therapy within 2 days of symptom onset (26.3%) than among those who started 2 or more days after symptom onset (0%) ( = 0.030). Among participants receiving N-R, those who had VR had prolonged shedding of replication-competent virus compared with those who did not have VR (median, 14 vs. 3 days). Eight of 16 participants (50% [CI, 25% to 75%]) with VR also reported symptom rebound; 2 were completely asymptomatic. No post-VR resistance mutations were detected.
Observational study design with differences between the treated and untreated groups; positive viral culture result was used as a surrogate marker for risk for ongoing viral transmission.
Virologic rebound occurred in approximately 1 in 5 people taking N-R, often without symptom rebound, and was associated with shedding of replication-competent virus.
National Institutes of Health.
关于使用奈玛特韦-利托那韦(N-R)治疗急性 COVID-19 与病毒学反弹(VR)之间的关联,数据存在矛盾。
比较急性 COVID-19 患者接受 N-R 治疗和未接受 N-R 治疗的 VR 发生率。
观察性队列研究。
马萨诸塞州波士顿的多中心医疗保健系统。
有急性 COVID-19 症状且使用或未使用 N-R 的门诊成年人。
接受 5 天 N-R 治疗与未接受 COVID-19 治疗。
主要结局是 VR,定义为先前阴性结果后出现 SARS-CoV-2 病毒培养阳性结果,或连续 2 次病毒载量高于 4.0 log 拷贝/mL,且比之前低于 4.0 log 拷贝/mL 的病毒载量至少高 1.0 log 拷贝/mL。
与未治疗者(n=55)相比,服用 N-R 者(n=72)年龄更大,接受了更多的 COVID-19 疫苗接种,且更常见免疫抑制。接受 N-R 治疗的 15 名参与者(20.8%)发生了 VR,而未接受治疗的参与者中只有 1 名(1.8%)发生了 VR(绝对差异,19.0 个百分点[95%CI,9.0 至 29.0 个百分点]; =0.001)。所有发生 VR 的患者在先前阴性结果后出现了阳性病毒培养结果。在多变量模型中,只有 N-R 使用与 VR 相关(调整后的优势比,10.02[CI,1.13 至 88.74]; =0.038)。与症状发作后 2 天内开始治疗的患者(26.3%)相比,症状发作后 2 天或以上开始治疗的患者(0%)的 VR 更常见( =0.030)。在接受 N-R 治疗的参与者中,发生 VR 的患者病毒复制能力的病毒脱落时间长于未发生 VR 的患者(中位数,14 天比 3 天)。16 名发生 VR 的参与者中有 8 名(50%[CI,25%至 75%])报告了症状反弹;2 名患者完全无症状。未检测到 VR 后出现的耐药突变。
治疗组和未治疗组之间存在差异的观察性研究设计;阳性病毒培养结果被用作持续病毒传播风险的替代标志物。
大约每 5 名服用 N-R 的人中就有 1 人发生病毒学反弹,通常没有症状反弹,并伴有具有复制能力的病毒脱落。
美国国立卫生研究院。