Suppr超能文献

SARS-CoV-2 病毒学反弹与奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗:一项观察性研究。

SARS-CoV-2 Virologic Rebound With Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Therapy : An Observational Study.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (G.E.E., Y.K., J.A.S.).

Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.B., C.M.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2023 Dec;176(12):1577-1585. doi: 10.7326/M23-1756. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data are conflicting regarding an association between treatment of acute COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (N-R) and virologic rebound (VR).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of VR in patients with and without N-R treatment for acute COVID-19.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Multicenter health care system in Boston, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Ambulatory adults with acute COVID-19 with and without use of N-R.

INTERVENTION

Receipt of 5 days of N-R treatment versus no COVID-19 therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was VR, defined as either a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture result after a prior negative result or 2 consecutive viral loads above 4.0 log copies/mL that were also at least 1.0 log copies/mL higher than a prior viral load below 4.0 log copies/mL.

RESULTS

Compared with untreated persons ( = 55), those taking N-R ( = 72) were older, received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and more commonly had immunosuppression. Fifteen participants (20.8%) taking N-R had VR versus 1 (1.8%) who was untreated (absolute difference, 19.0 percentage points [95% CI, 9.0 to 29.0 percentage points]; = 0.001). All persons with VR had a positive viral culture result after a prior negative result. In multivariable models, only N-R use was associated with VR (adjusted odds ratio, 10.02 [CI, 1.13 to 88.74]; = 0.038). Virologic rebound was more common among those who started therapy within 2 days of symptom onset (26.3%) than among those who started 2 or more days after symptom onset (0%) ( = 0.030). Among participants receiving N-R, those who had VR had prolonged shedding of replication-competent virus compared with those who did not have VR (median, 14 vs. 3 days). Eight of 16 participants (50% [CI, 25% to 75%]) with VR also reported symptom rebound; 2 were completely asymptomatic. No post-VR resistance mutations were detected.

LIMITATIONS

Observational study design with differences between the treated and untreated groups; positive viral culture result was used as a surrogate marker for risk for ongoing viral transmission.

CONCLUSION

Virologic rebound occurred in approximately 1 in 5 people taking N-R, often without symptom rebound, and was associated with shedding of replication-competent virus.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

摘要

背景

关于使用奈玛特韦-利托那韦(N-R)治疗急性 COVID-19 与病毒学反弹(VR)之间的关联,数据存在矛盾。

目的

比较急性 COVID-19 患者接受 N-R 治疗和未接受 N-R 治疗的 VR 发生率。

设计

观察性队列研究。

地点

马萨诸塞州波士顿的多中心医疗保健系统。

参与者

有急性 COVID-19 症状且使用或未使用 N-R 的门诊成年人。

干预措施

接受 5 天 N-R 治疗与未接受 COVID-19 治疗。

测量

主要结局是 VR,定义为先前阴性结果后出现 SARS-CoV-2 病毒培养阳性结果,或连续 2 次病毒载量高于 4.0 log 拷贝/mL,且比之前低于 4.0 log 拷贝/mL 的病毒载量至少高 1.0 log 拷贝/mL。

结果

与未治疗者(n=55)相比,服用 N-R 者(n=72)年龄更大,接受了更多的 COVID-19 疫苗接种,且更常见免疫抑制。接受 N-R 治疗的 15 名参与者(20.8%)发生了 VR,而未接受治疗的参与者中只有 1 名(1.8%)发生了 VR(绝对差异,19.0 个百分点[95%CI,9.0 至 29.0 个百分点]; =0.001)。所有发生 VR 的患者在先前阴性结果后出现了阳性病毒培养结果。在多变量模型中,只有 N-R 使用与 VR 相关(调整后的优势比,10.02[CI,1.13 至 88.74]; =0.038)。与症状发作后 2 天内开始治疗的患者(26.3%)相比,症状发作后 2 天或以上开始治疗的患者(0%)的 VR 更常见( =0.030)。在接受 N-R 治疗的参与者中,发生 VR 的患者病毒复制能力的病毒脱落时间长于未发生 VR 的患者(中位数,14 天比 3 天)。16 名发生 VR 的参与者中有 8 名(50%[CI,25%至 75%])报告了症状反弹;2 名患者完全无症状。未检测到 VR 后出现的耐药突变。

局限性

治疗组和未治疗组之间存在差异的观察性研究设计;阳性病毒培养结果被用作持续病毒传播风险的替代标志物。

结论

大约每 5 名服用 N-R 的人中就有 1 人发生病毒学反弹,通常没有症状反弹,并伴有具有复制能力的病毒脱落。

主要资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fc6/10644265/f1ffb1b3d25e/aim-olf-M231756-AIME202312190-M231756_visual-abstract.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验