National Blood Centre, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Blood Transfus. 2024 Nov;22(6):537-550. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.764. Epub 2024 May 27.
There is some evidence showing rebound of COVID-19 infections in patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir between 2 and 8 days following cessation of the antiviral treatment. COVID-19 rebound is not unique to patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, but is also observed in molnupiravir recipients, in patients who did not receive any antiviral treatment and in patients who received convalescent plasma (CP).
This was a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating rates of virologic and clinical rebound in COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral agents, CP or no treatment. Both randomized clinical trials and controlled cohort studies were considered. The methodological quality of trials was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBIN-1 checklists, and the GRADE approach.
Data were available from 16 trials. The occurrence of virologic rebound was more commonly observed among nirmatrelvir recipients than among untreated patients (relative risk [RR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-3.28; p=0.0007). No differences were observed in the occurrence of virologic rebound between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.71-1.43). Similar rates of virologic rebounds were observed in molnupiravir recipients and untreated patients (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.81-1.6). One study in the pre-omicron period compared rates of virologic rebound between patients receiving standard of care with or without CP: no differences were observed between groups (RR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.55-1.99). Rates of clinical rebound were reported in seven trials, five evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and untreated patients, and two evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed. For all these comparisons, the certainty of the available evidence was graded as low or moderate.
Virologic rebound of COVID-19 infections appears to be mild and self-limited, and was observed more commonly in nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients than in untreated patients, but was also observed in patients treated with molnupiravir or CP.
有一些证据表明,在接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的患者停止抗病毒治疗后 2 至 8 天,COVID-19 感染出现反弹。COVID-19 反弹并非仅见于接受奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗的患者,也见于接受莫努匹韦治疗的患者、未接受任何抗病毒治疗的患者以及接受恢复期血浆(CP)治疗的患者。
这是一项系统评价,对评估 COVID-19 患者接受抗病毒药物、CP 或无治疗后病毒学和临床反弹率的临床试验进行了荟萃分析。既考虑了随机临床试验,也考虑了对照队列研究。使用 ROB-2 和 ROBIN-1 清单以及 GRADE 方法评估试验的方法学质量。
从 16 项试验中获得了数据。与未接受治疗的患者相比,奈玛特韦治疗组更常发生病毒学反弹(相对风险 [RR]=2.12;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.38-3.28;p=0.0007)。奈玛特韦-利托那韦与莫努匹韦治疗组之间未观察到病毒学反弹的差异(RR=1.01;95% CI:0.71-1.43)。莫努匹韦治疗组和未接受治疗的患者的病毒学反弹率相似(RR=1.14;95% CI:0.81-1.6)。一项发生在 omicron 之前的研究比较了接受标准治疗的患者加用或不加用 CP 的病毒学反弹率:两组之间无差异(RR=1.04;95% CI:0.55-1.99)。有 7 项试验报告了临床反弹率,其中 5 项评估了奈玛特韦-利托那韦与未接受治疗的患者,2 项评估了奈玛特韦-利托那韦与莫努匹韦治疗组。未观察到组间存在统计学显著差异。对于所有这些比较,可用证据的确定性均被评为低或中度。
COVID-19 感染的病毒学反弹似乎较轻且为自限性,在奈玛特韦-利托那韦治疗组比未接受治疗的患者中更为常见,但也见于接受莫努匹韦或 CP 治疗的患者。