• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于表征癫痫脑网络动力学的机器学习可解释性方法

Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize Brain Network Dynamics in Epilepsy.

作者信息

Upadhyaya Dipak P, Prantzalos Katrina, Thyagaraj Suraj, Shafiabadi Nassim, Fernandez-BacaVaca Guadalupe, Sivagnanam Subhashini, Majumdar Amitava, Sahoo Satya S

机构信息

Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Oct 19:2023.06.25.23291874. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.25.23291874.

DOI:10.1101/2023.06.25.23291874
PMID:37425941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10327223/
Abstract

The rapid adoption of machine learning (ML) algorithms in a wide range of biomedical applications has highlighted issues of trust and the lack of understanding regarding the results generated by ML algorithms. Recent studies have focused on developing interpretable ML models and establish guidelines for transparency and ethical use, ensuring the responsible integration of machine learning in healthcare. In this study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of ML interpretability methods to provide important insights into the dynamics of brain network interactions in epilepsy, a serious neurological disorder affecting more than 60 million persons worldwide. Using high-resolution intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings from a cohort of 16 patients, we developed high accuracy ML models to categorize these brain activity recordings into either seizure or non-seizure classes followed by a more complex task of delineating the different stages of seizure progression to different parts of the brain as a multi-class classification task. We applied three distinct types of interpretability methods to the high-accuracy ML models to gain an understanding of the relative contributions of different categories of brain interaction patterns, including multi-focii interactions, which play an important role in distinguishing between different states of the brain. The results of this study demonstrate for the first time that post-hoc interpretability methods enable us to understand why ML algorithms generate a given set of results and how variations in value of input values affect the accuracy of the ML algorithms. In particular, we show in this study that interpretability methods can be used to identify brain regions and interaction patterns that have a significant impact on seizure events. The results of this study highlight the importance of the integrated implementation of ML algorithms together with interpretability methods in aberrant brain network studies and the wider domain of biomedical research.

摘要

机器学习(ML)算法在广泛的生物医学应用中的迅速采用,凸显了信任问题以及对ML算法产生的结果缺乏理解。最近的研究集中在开发可解释的ML模型,并建立透明度和道德使用的指导方针,以确保机器学习在医疗保健中的负责任整合。在本研究中,我们展示了ML可解释性方法的有效性,以深入了解癫痫中脑网络相互作用的动态,癫痫是一种严重的神经系统疾病,全球有超过6000万人受其影响。我们使用来自16名患者队列的高分辨率颅内脑电图(EEG)记录,开发了高精度的ML模型,将这些脑活动记录分类为癫痫发作或非癫痫发作类别,随后是一项更复杂的任务,即将癫痫发作进展的不同阶段描绘到大脑的不同部位,作为一个多类分类任务。我们将三种不同类型的可解释性方法应用于高精度ML模型,以了解不同类别的脑交互模式的相对贡献,包括多灶性交互,其在区分大脑的不同状态中起重要作用。本研究结果首次表明,事后可解释性方法使我们能够理解ML算法为何生成给定的一组结果,以及输入值的变化如何影响ML算法的准确性。特别是,我们在本研究中表明,可解释性方法可用于识别对癫痫发作事件有重大影响的脑区和交互模式。本研究结果强调了在异常脑网络研究和更广泛的生物医学研究领域中,将ML算法与可解释性方法集成实施的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/4701aa0b4a4d/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/82ce6b424e58/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/cd15b3f5ed39/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/f9ccce71dabb/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/a111edefd87e/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/ddcddbe115b4/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/4701aa0b4a4d/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/82ce6b424e58/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/cd15b3f5ed39/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/f9ccce71dabb/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/a111edefd87e/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/ddcddbe115b4/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb9/10602481/4701aa0b4a4d/nihpp-2023.06.25.23291874v2-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize Brain Network Dynamics in Epilepsy.用于表征癫痫脑网络动力学的机器学习可解释性方法
medRxiv. 2023 Oct 19:2023.06.25.23291874. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.25.23291874.
2
MaTiLDA: An Integrated Machine Learning and Topological Data Analysis Platform for Brain Network Dynamics.MaTiLDA:一个用于脑网络动力学的集成机器学习和拓扑数据分析平台。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2024;29:65-80.
3
On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension.基于机器学习的高血压预测模型的可解释性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0874-0.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Demystifying the Black Box: The Importance of Interpretability of Predictive Models in Neurocritical Care.揭开黑箱的神秘面纱:神经危重症中预测模型可解释性的重要性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):185-191. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01504-4. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
Development of prediction models for one-year brain tumour survival using machine learning: a comparison of accuracy and interpretability.使用机器学习开发脑肿瘤一年生存率预测模型:准确性与可解释性的比较
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 May;233:107482. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107482. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Designing an Interpretability-Based Model to Explain the Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Healthcare.设计一个基于可解释性的模型来解释医疗保健中的人工智能算法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;12(7):1557. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071557.
9
Epileptic seizure detection: a comparative study between deep and traditional machine learning techniques.癫痫发作检测:深度学习与传统机器学习技术的比较研究
J Integr Neurosci. 2020 Mar 30;19(1):1-9. doi: 10.31083/j.jin.2020.01.24.
10
A channel independent generalized seizure detection method for pediatric epileptic seizures.一种用于儿科癫痫发作的通道无关的广义癫痫发作检测方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;209:106335. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106335. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Promises and pitfalls of topological data analysis for brain connectivity analysis.拓扑数据分析在脑连接分析中的优势和陷阱。
Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118245. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118245. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
NeuroIntegrative Connectivity (NIC) Informatics Tool for Brain Functional Connectivity Network Analysis in Cohort Studies.神经整合连接(NIC)信息学工具,用于队列研究中的脑功能连接网络分析。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1090-1099. eCollection 2020.
3
Machine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Review.
使用脑电图信号预测癫痫发作的机器学习综述
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;14:139-155. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2020.3008792. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
A roadmap for the computation of persistent homology.持久同调计算路线图。
EPJ Data Sci. 2017;6(1):17. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0109-5. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
The importance of the whole: Topological data analysis for the network neuroscientist.整体的重要性:面向网络神经科学家的拓扑数据分析
Netw Neurosci. 2019 Jul 1;3(3):656-673. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00073. eCollection 2019.
6
Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review.基于深度学习的脑电图分析:系统评价。
J Neural Eng. 2019 Aug 14;16(5):051001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab260c.
7
Topological Data Analysis of Single-Trial Electroencephalographic Signals.单次试验脑电图信号的拓扑数据分析
Ann Appl Stat. 2018 Sep;12(3):1506-1534. doi: 10.1214/17-AOAS1119. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
8
Seizure prediction - ready for a new era.癫痫发作预测——迎接新纪元。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Oct;14(10):618-630. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0055-2.
9
Towards a new approach to reveal dynamical organization of the brain using topological data analysis.采用拓扑数据分析方法揭示大脑动态组织的新方法。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 11;9(1):1399. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03664-4.
10
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention.癫痫患者的突发性意外死亡:流行病学、机制与预防。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1075-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30158-2. Epub 2016 Aug 8.