Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;26(7):896-899. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0209. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) and palliative care often have an antagonistic relationship in jurisdictions where both are legal, but the early ethical and legal history of palliative care closely mirrors that of MAID in important ways. Palliative practices that are commonplace today were considered homicide or "medically assisted death" in most jurisdictions until quite recently. Moreover, while many patients request MAID today for reasons that are criticized as "ableist," the same rationale is accepted without comment or judgment when used to justify withdrawal of life support or a discontinuation of life-prolonging therapies. Concerns about factors that undermine autonomous decisions for MAID would apply equally to routine palliative care practices. By the same token, palliative care exists because no field in medicine is able to fix every problem it encounters. It is ironic, therefore, that some palliative care providers oppose MAID with the hubristic argument that we can relieve all forms of suffering. Palliative care providers may choose not to participate in MAID, but palliative care and MAID do not have to be mutually exclusive and are often complementary and synergistic for patients and families.
医疗辅助死亡(MAID)和姑息治疗在法律都允许的司法管辖区通常存在对抗关系,但姑息治疗的早期伦理和法律历史在重要方面与 MAID 密切相关。直到最近,在大多数司法管辖区,今天被认为是姑息治疗常见做法的行为在过去被视为杀人罪或“医疗协助死亡”。此外,尽管今天许多患者出于被批评为“歧视性”的原因要求 MAID,但当用于为撤回生命支持或停止延长生命的治疗辩护时,同样的理由被接受而没有任何评论或判断。对破坏 MAID 自主决策的因素的担忧同样适用于常规姑息治疗实践。同样,姑息治疗之所以存在,是因为医学领域没有任何一个领域能够解决它遇到的每一个问题。因此,一些姑息治疗提供者以傲慢的论点反对 MAID,认为我们可以缓解所有形式的痛苦,这是具有讽刺意味的。姑息治疗提供者可以选择不参与 MAID,但姑息治疗和 MAID不一定相互排斥,并且通常对患者和家属来说是互补和协同的。