Bailey Elizabeth, Heneghan Nicola R, Cassidy Natasha J, Falla Deborah, Rushton Alison B
Physiotherapy, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037783.
Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a common musculoskeletal condition resulting in pain, physical limitations and associated functional disability. Current guidelines recommend manipulation and/or mobilisation as part of the multimodal management of NSNP. This study focuses on intervention at the articular level and aims to identify whether joint mobilisation or joint manipulation has a greater effect on function, range of movement or pain outcomes in the management of NSNP.
A systematic review protocol has been designed and is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. A targeted search strategy will enable searching of key databases from inception to 31 March 2020: CINAHL, PEDro, AMED, EMBASE, OVID, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar. Key journals will be searched using predefined keywords determined from preliminary scoping searches for randomised controlled trials of manipulation and mobilisation modalities for adults with NSNP in the absence of radiculopathy or whiplash, published in English. Grey literature and unpublished studies will also be searched. Studies will be screened by title and abstract and full text. Two independent reviewers will conduct the searches independently, extract data, assess risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2) and assess overall strength of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Meta-analysis will be performed where individual studies measure comparable outcomes including performance-based outcome measures such as range of movement or patient reported outcome measures such as Neck Disability Index; and where interventions are comparable in their delivery such as number of oscillations and Maitland grading. Where not possible, data will be presented descriptively.
This study does not require ethical approval. Findings will be submitted for publication to relevant peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at profession-specific conferences.
CRD42020164457.
非特异性颈部疼痛(NSNP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,会导致疼痛、身体活动受限及相关功能障碍。当前指南推荐将手法治疗和/或关节松动术作为NSNP多模式管理的一部分。本研究聚焦于关节层面的干预,旨在确定在NSNP管理中,关节松动术或关节整复术对功能、活动范围或疼痛结局是否有更大影响。
已设计了一项系统评价方案,并按照系统评价和Meta分析方案的首选报告项目进行报告。有针对性的检索策略将能够检索从建库至2020年3月31日的关键数据库:护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、循证医学图书馆(PEDro)、联合和补充医学数据库(AMED)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、OVID、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)和谷歌学术。将使用从初步范围检索中确定的预定义关键词搜索关键期刊,这些关键词用于检索针对无神经根病或挥鞭伤的NSNP成人患者的手法治疗和关节松动术方式的随机对照试验,并以英文发表。还将检索灰色文献和未发表的研究。将通过标题、摘要和全文对研究进行筛选。两名独立的评审员将独立进行检索、提取数据、评估偏倚风险(Cochrane偏倚风险工具2)并评估证据的总体强度(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)。当个体研究测量可比结局时,将进行Meta分析,这些可比结局包括基于表现的结局指标,如活动范围,或患者报告的结局指标,如颈部残疾指数;并且当干预措施在实施方面具有可比性时,如摆动次数和梅特兰分级。若无法进行Meta分析,将对数据进行描述性呈现。
本研究无需伦理批准。研究结果将提交至相关同行评审期刊发表,并将在特定专业会议上展示。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42020164457。