• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? No: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡检查中的无呼吸试验是否需要替代者知情同意？否：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):221-222. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207333. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? Yes: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡检查中的 apnea 测试是否需要代理人知情同意？答案是肯定的：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):218-220. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207343. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
POINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? No.观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停试验，是否应要求获得知情同意？不应要求。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):700-702. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.反驳观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停测试，是否应该要求获得知情同意？应该。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5
The apnea test in brain death determination using oxygen diffusion method remains safe.采用氧弥散法进行脑死亡判定时的 apnea 试验仍然是安全的。 （注：这里“apnea”常见释义为“呼吸暂停” ，但不清楚在该医学语境下具体准确含义，可根据实际医学知识进一步确认准确表述 ）
Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):386-387. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006963. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
6
COUNTERPOINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? No.反驳观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？不应获得。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1145-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.029.
7
POINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? Yes.观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？是。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1143-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.026.
8
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.脑死亡判定中进行窒息试验要求同意的法律和伦理考虑。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754501.
9
Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.支持修订《统一死亡判定法》并反对一项拟议修订案的声明。
J Med Philos. 2021 May 14. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhab014.
10
Apnea test in the diagnosis of brain death.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2000 Nov;27(4):353-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Quest to Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act: Why We Tried, Why We Failed, and Where We Go from Here.修订《统一死亡判定法案》的探索：我们为何尝试、为何失败以及我们将何去何从。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01964-w. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
New developments in guidelines for brain death/death by neurological criteria.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡指南的新进展。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Mar;20(3):151-161. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00929-z. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Potential Threats and Impediments to the Clinical Practice of Brain Death Determination: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡判定临床实践的潜在威胁和障碍：UDDA 修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 8;101(6):270-279. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207404. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
COUNTERPOINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? No.反驳观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？不应获得。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1145-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.029.
2
POINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? Yes.观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？是。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1143-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.026.
3
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: The World Brain Death Project.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡：世界脑死亡项目。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1078-1097. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11586.
4
Determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world.全球范围内通过神经学标准判断死亡。
Neurology. 2020 Jul 21;95(3):e299-e309. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009888. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review.脑死亡判定中呼吸暂停试验的系统评价：范围综述。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Apr;34(2):608-620. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0.
6
Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests: AAN position statement.脑死亡、脑死亡的判定以及脑死亡收容请求的成员指南：美国神经病学学会立场声明
Neurology. 2019 Jan 28;92(5):228-232. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006750.
7
POINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? No.观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停试验，是否应要求获得知情同意？不应要求。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):700-702. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
Rebuttal From Drs Truog and Tasker.
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):705-706. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 Task Force recommendations.婴儿和儿童脑死亡判定指南：1987 年工作组建议的更新。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2139-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0d4f.
10
Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.基于证据的指南更新：成人脑死亡判定：美国神经病学学会质量标准分委会的报告。
Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1911-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8.

Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? No: The UDDA Revision Series.

作者信息

Greer David

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, MA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):221-222. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207333. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207333
PMID:37429710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10401682/
Abstract
摘要