• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TANGO:一种可靠的、开源的、基于浏览器的任务,用于评估 3 至 5 岁儿童和成人在注视理解方面的个体差异。

TANGO: A reliable, open-source, browser-based task to assess individual differences in gaze understanding in 3 to 5-year-old children and adults.

机构信息

Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2469-2485. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02159-5. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02159-5
PMID:37429985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10991054/
Abstract

Traditional measures of social cognition used in developmental research often lack satisfactory psychometric properties and are not designed to capture variation between individuals. Here, we present the TANGO (Task for Assessing iNdividual differences in Gaze understanding-Open); a brief (approx. 5-10min), reliable, open-source task to quantify individual differences in the understanding of gaze cues. Localizing the attentional focus of an agent is crucial in inferring their mental states, building common ground, and thus, supporting cooperation. Our interactive browser-based task works across devices and enables in-person and remote testing. The implemented spatial layout allows for discrete and continuous measures of participants' click imprecision and is easily adaptable to different study requirements. Our task measures inter-individual differences in a child (N = 387) and an adult (N = 236) sample. Our two study versions and data collection modes yield comparable results that show substantial developmental gains: the older children are, the more accurately they locate the target. High internal consistency and test-retest reliability estimates underline that the captured variation is systematic. Associations with social-environmental factors and language skills speak to the validity of the task. This work shows a promising way forward in studying individual differences in social cognition and will help us explore the structure and development of our core social-cognitive processes in greater detail.

摘要

传统的发展研究中使用的社会认知测量方法往往缺乏令人满意的心理测量特性,并且不能捕捉个体之间的差异。在这里,我们提出了 TANGO(用于评估个体在注视理解方面差异的任务-开放);这是一个简短的(大约 5-10 分钟)、可靠的、开源任务,用于量化个体在理解注视线索方面的差异。定位代理人的注意力焦点对于推断他们的心理状态、建立共同基础从而支持合作至关重要。我们的基于浏览器的交互式任务可在各种设备上使用,并支持现场和远程测试。所实现的空间布局允许对参与者点击不准确性进行离散和连续的测量,并且易于适应不同的研究要求。我们的任务在儿童(N=387)和成人(N=236)样本中测量个体间差异。我们的两个研究版本和数据收集模式产生了可比的结果,显示出了显著的发展性收益:年龄较大的孩子定位目标的准确性越高。高内部一致性和测试-重测可靠性估计表明,所捕捉到的变化是系统的。与社会环境因素和语言技能的关联证明了任务的有效性。这项工作展示了研究社会认知个体差异的一种很有前途的方法,并将帮助我们更详细地探索我们核心社会认知过程的结构和发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/04d12b0deb04/13428_2023_2159_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/29d1a3f446d0/13428_2023_2159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/07312b99cd9c/13428_2023_2159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/a1a41410d720/13428_2023_2159_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/2a41572c6bf3/13428_2023_2159_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/04d12b0deb04/13428_2023_2159_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/29d1a3f446d0/13428_2023_2159_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/07312b99cd9c/13428_2023_2159_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/a1a41410d720/13428_2023_2159_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/2a41572c6bf3/13428_2023_2159_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cc/10991054/04d12b0deb04/13428_2023_2159_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
TANGO: A reliable, open-source, browser-based task to assess individual differences in gaze understanding in 3 to 5-year-old children and adults.TANGO:一种可靠的、开源的、基于浏览器的任务,用于评估 3 至 5 岁儿童和成人在注视理解方面的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2469-2485. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02159-5. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Variation in gaze following across the life span: A process-level perspective.注视跟随在整个生命周期中的变化:一个过程层面的视角。
Dev Sci. 2024 Nov;27(6):e13546. doi: 10.1111/desc.13546. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Preliminary evidence supporting the clinical utility of an Analog Task of Prosocial Helping.支持亲社会帮助模拟任务临床实用性的初步证据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):782-795. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12718. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Converging evidence for domain-general developmental trends of mental attentional capacity: Validity and reliability of full and abbreviated measures.汇聚的证据表明心理注意力能力具有普遍的发展趋势:完整和缩写测量的有效性和可靠性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Oct;222:105462. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105462. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.注意力的注视提示:视觉注意力、社会认知与个体差异
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):694-724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.
7
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
8
Do current statistical learning tasks capture stable individual differences in children? An investigation of task reliability across modality.当前的统计学习任务能否捕捉到儿童稳定的个体差异?对跨模态任务可靠性的调查。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):68-81. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01205-5.
9
Examining the effects of social anxiety and other individual differences on gaze-directed attentional shifts.研究社交焦虑及其他个体差异对注视引导的注意力转移的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Apr;74(4):771-785. doi: 10.1177/1747021820973954. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
The Children's Social Understanding Scale: construction and validation of a parent-report measure for assessing individual differences in children's theories of mind.儿童社会理解量表:一种用于评估儿童心理理论个体差异的家长报告测量工具的编制与验证
Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2485-97. doi: 10.1037/a0037914. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
How electronic health literacy influences physical activity behaviour among university students: A moderated mediation model.电子健康素养如何影响大学生的体育活动行为:一个有调节的中介模型。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0330637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330637. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of an open source, remote web-based eye-tracking method (WebGazer) for research in early childhood.验证一种开源的、基于远程网络的眼动追踪方法(WebGazer)在儿童早期研究中的应用。
Infancy. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):31-55. doi: 10.1111/infa.12564. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words.幼儿如何整合信息源来推断单词的意思。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1046-1054. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Children's interpretation of ambiguous pronouns based on prior discourse.基于前文语境,儿童对模糊代词的解读。
Dev Sci. 2021 May;24(3):e13049. doi: 10.1111/desc.13049. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
3
The Developmental Origins of Gaze-Following in Human Infants.人类婴儿注视跟随行为的发育起源
Infancy. 2019 May;24(3):433-454. doi: 10.1111/infa.12276. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
The unreliability of egocentric bias across self-other and memory-belief distinctions in the Sandbox Task.在沙盒任务中,自我中心偏差在自我-他人及记忆-信念区分方面的不可靠性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Nov 7;5(11):181355. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181355. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
Infant gaze following depends on communicative signals: An eye-tracking study of 5- to 7-month-olds in Vanuatu.婴儿的目光追随取决于交际信号:对瓦努阿图 5 至 7 个月大婴儿的眼动研究。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jul;22(4):e12779. doi: 10.1111/desc.12779. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing.个体语言习得和处理的差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb;22(2):154-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Theory of mind is related to children's resource allocations in gender stereotypic contexts.心理理论与儿童在性别刻板情境中的资源分配有关。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;54(3):510-520. doi: 10.1037/dev0000439. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
The developmental trajectory of children's auditory and visual statistical learning abilities: modality-based differences in the effect of age.儿童听觉和视觉统计学习能力的发展轨迹:基于模态的年龄效应差异。
Dev Sci. 2018 Jul;21(4):e12593. doi: 10.1111/desc.12593. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.可靠性悖论:为何稳健的认知任务不能产生可靠的个体差异。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
10
Individual differences in object-processing explain the relationship between early gaze-following and later language development.物体加工过程中的个体差异解释了早期视线追随与后期语言发展之间的关系。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 16.