Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Trials. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07486-8.
The necessity of spinal segment fusion after decompression is one of the most controversial and unresolved issues in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. To date, only one trial carried out 15 years ago focused on this problem. The key purpose of the current trial is to compare the long-term clinical results of the two surgical methods (decompression vs. decompression and fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis.
This study is focused on the non-inferior clinical results of decompression compared with the standard fusion procedure. In the decompression group, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and corresponding parts of the vertebral arch are to be preserved intact. In the fusion group, decompression is to be supplemented with transforaminal interbody fusion. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two equal groups (1:1), depending on the surgical method. The final analysis will include 86 patients (43 per group). The primary endpoint is Oswestry Disability Index dynamics at the end of the 24-month follow-up compared to the baseline level. Secondary outcomes included those estimated using the SF-36 scale, EQ-5D-5L, and psychological scales. Additional parameters will include sagittal balance of the spine, fusion results, total cost of surgery, and hospital stay followed by two-year treatment. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months DISCUSSION: Authors suggest that this study will improve the evidence for application of various surgical techniques for lumbar spine stenosis surgery and verify the existing protocol for surgical management.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273879 . Registered on March 10, 2022.
减压后脊柱节段融合的必要性是单节段腰椎管狭窄症手术中最具争议和悬而未决的问题之一。迄今为止,只有一项 15 年前进行的试验关注了这个问题。本试验的主要目的是比较两种手术方法(减压与减压融合)在单节段腰椎管狭窄症患者中的长期临床结果。
本研究重点关注减压与标准融合术相比的非劣效临床结果。在减压组中,棘突、棘间和棘上韧带、部分关节突关节以及相应的椎弓部分将被完整保留。在融合组中,减压要辅以经椎间孔椎体间融合。符合纳入标准的参与者将根据手术方法随机分为两组(1:1)。最终分析将包括 86 名患者(每组 43 名)。主要终点是 24 个月随访结束时与基线水平相比的 Oswestry 残疾指数变化。次要结果包括使用 SF-36 量表、EQ-5D-5L 和心理量表估计的结果。其他参数将包括脊柱矢状平衡、融合结果、手术总成本和住院时间,随后进行两年治疗。随访检查将在 3、6、12 和 24 个月进行。
作者认为,本研究将提高各种手术技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症手术的证据,并验证现有的手术管理方案。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273879。于 2022 年 3 月 10 日注册。