Hwang Raymond W, Briggs Catherine M, Greenwald Scott D, Manberg Paul J, Chamoun Nassib G, Tromanhauser Scott G
New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 1;105(3):214-222. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00181. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Spine surgery has demonstrated cost-effectiveness in reducing pain and restoring function, but the impact of spine surgery relative to nonsurgical care on longer-term outcomes has been less well described. Our objective was to compare single-level surgical treatment for lumbar stenosis, with or without spondylolisthesis, and nonsurgical treatment with respect to patient mortality, resource utilization, and health-care payments over the first 2 years following initial treatment.
A retrospective review of the Medicare National Database Fee for Service Files from 2011 to 2017 was performed. A 2-year prediction of mortality risk (risk stratification index, RSI) was used as a measure of patient baseline health. Patients (88%) were matched by RSI and demographics. Mortality, spine-related health-care utilization, and 2-year total Medicare payments for patients undergoing surgical treatment were compared with matched patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment.
We identified 61,534 patients with stenosis alone and 83,813 with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Surgical treatment was associated with 28% lower 2-year mortality compared with matched patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment. Total Medicare payments were significantly lower for patients with stenosis alone undergoing laminectomy alone and for patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis undergoing laminectomy with or without fusion compared with patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment. There was no significant difference in mortality when fusion or laminectomy was compared with combined fusion and laminectomy. However, laminectomy alone was associated with significantly lower 2-year payments when treating stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis.
Surgical treatment for stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis within the Medicare population was associated with significantly lower mortality and total medical payments at 2 years compared with nonsurgical treatment, although residual confounding could have contributed to these findings.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
脊柱手术已证明在减轻疼痛和恢复功能方面具有成本效益,但相对于非手术治疗,脊柱手术对长期预后的影响描述较少。我们的目的是比较单纯腰椎管狭窄症(伴或不伴椎体滑脱)的单节段手术治疗与非手术治疗在初始治疗后的头2年里对患者死亡率、资源利用和医疗费用的影响。
对2011年至2017年医疗保险国家数据库服务收费文件进行回顾性分析。使用2年死亡风险预测(风险分层指数,RSI)作为患者基线健康状况的衡量指标。患者(88%)根据RSI和人口统计学特征进行匹配。将接受手术治疗患者的死亡率、脊柱相关医疗资源利用情况以及2年医疗保险总费用与匹配的接受非手术治疗的患者进行比较。
我们识别出61534例单纯狭窄患者和83813例狭窄伴椎体滑脱患者。与匹配的接受非手术治疗的患者相比,手术治疗使2年死亡率降低了28%。单纯狭窄患者单纯行椎板切除术以及狭窄伴椎体滑脱患者行椎板切除术(伴或不伴融合)的医疗保险总费用显著低于接受非手术治疗的患者。融合术或椎板切除术与融合术加椎板切除术相比,死亡率无显著差异。然而,在治疗狭窄伴或不伴椎体滑脱时,单纯椎板切除术的2年费用显著更低。
在医疗保险人群中,伴或不伴椎体滑脱的狭窄症手术治疗与非手术治疗相比,2年时死亡率和总医疗费用显著更低,尽管这些结果可能存在残余混杂因素。
治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。