• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The determinants of the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.为无家可归人群提供的食物的营养质量的决定因素:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 10;12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02286-2.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Improving the nutritional quality of charitable meals for homeless and vulnerable adults. A case study of food provision by a food aid organisation in the UK.改善为无家可归及弱势成年人提供的慈善餐食的营养质量。英国一家食品援助组织的食品供应案例研究。
Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
5
Nutritional assessment of charitable meal programmes serving homeless people in Toronto.对多伦多为无家可归者提供慈善餐食项目的营养评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Dec;11(12):1296-305. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008002577. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
6
Interventions for preventing or treating malnutrition in problem drinkers who are homeless or vulnerably housed: protocol for a systematic review.针对无家可归或住房条件差的问题饮酒者预防或治疗营养不良的干预措施:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;4:131. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0114-3.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.菜单标签干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素,以支持健康食物选择:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 23;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0752-3.
8
Food choice and nutrient intake amongst homeless people.无家可归者的食物选择和营养摄入情况。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Jun;27(3):242-50. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12130. Epub 2013 May 17.
9
A systematic review of the nutritional status of adults experiencing homelessness.一项对无家可归成年人营养状况的系统评价。
Public Health. 2022 Jul;208:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.04.013. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Interventions by healthcare professionals to improve management of physical long-term conditions in adults who are homeless: a systematic review protocol.卫生保健专业人员干预措施,以改善无家可归的成年人身体长期疾病的管理:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016756.

引用本文的文献

1
The Experiences of Adults Experiencing Homelessness When Accessing and Using Psychosocial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.无家可归成年人在获取和使用心理社会干预措施时的经历:一项系统综述和定性证据综合分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 3;21(2):e70036. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70036. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Nutrition Status of People Experiencing Homelessness Residing in Temporary Accommodation in London.居住在伦敦临时住所的无家可归者的营养状况。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e70024. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70024.
3
Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating in disadvantaged adults living in the UK: a scoping review.英国贫困成年人健康饮食的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):1770. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19259-2.
4
Nutritional needs, resources, and barriers among unhoused adults cared for by a street medicine organization in Chicago, Illinois: a cross-sectional study.芝加哥街头医学组织照顾的无家可归成年人的营养需求、资源和障碍:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2430. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16790-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows.达尔格伦-怀特黑德健康决定因素模型:30 年后仍在追寻彩虹。
Public Health. 2021 Oct;199:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Feeding the food insecure in Britain: learning from the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.为英国粮食不安全人群提供食物:从2020年新冠疫情危机中吸取经验教训。
Food Secur. 2020;12(4):865-870. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01080-5. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
4
Gratitude, resignation and the desire for dignity: lived experience of food charity recipients and their recommendations for improvement, Perth, Western Australia.感恩、顺从和对尊严的渴望:食物慈善接受者的生活体验及其改进建议,西澳大利亚州珀斯。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(15):2831-2841. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001428. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Barriers and facilitators to asthma self-management in adolescents: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.青少年哮喘自我管理的障碍与促进因素:定性和定量研究的系统综述
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Apr;52(4):430-442. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23556. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
6
Nutrition and the homeless: the underestimated challenge.营养与无家可归者:被低估的挑战。
Nutr Res Rev. 2016 Dec;29(2):143-151. doi: 10.1017/S0954422416000068. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
The food-insecurity obesity paradox: A resource scarcity hypothesis.粮食不安全与肥胖悖论:一种资源稀缺假说。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
8
Nutrition for homeless populations: shelters and soup kitchens as opportunities for intervention.无家可归者的营养:收容所和施粥处作为干预的契机。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 May;19(7):1312-4. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002682. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
9
Assessment of Food Intake, Obesity, and Health Risk among the Homeless in Rhode Island.罗德岛无家可归者的食物摄入量、肥胖状况及健康风险评估
Public Health Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;32(5):453-61. doi: 10.1111/phn.12180. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

为无家可归人群提供的食物的营养质量的决定因素:一项混合方法系统评价方案。

The determinants of the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Health Promotion Department, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 10;12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02286-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02286-2
PMID:37430337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10332093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies assessing the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population show deficiencies in micronutrients and excess fat, sugar, and salt. The availability of cheap, energy-dense and nutrient-poor food has changed the profile of people living with homelessness from primarily underweight to obese in western countries. Many factors influence the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population such as budget and time constraints, food donations and limited equipment. Nutrient intakes in this population are unlikely to be met outside of charitable meal programmes, making the nutritional quality of these meals crucial. This review will synthesise mixed methods literature with the overarching aim of understanding the determinants of the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population.

METHODS

This mixed methods systematic review will include English language empirical research studies from Europe, North America and Oceania. The following electronic databases have been chosen for this review: SCOPUS, EMBASE, PsycINFO, EBSCOHost SocIndex and CINAHL. The grey literature databases OpenGrey and ProQuest will also be searched. Quality appraisal will be conducted using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Two independent reviewers will be included in study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal. A third reviewer will resolve conflicts. Thematic synthesis will be employed.

DISCUSSION

Results will be organised based on a determinants of health model, to highlight areas where change may be effective, thereby making it more likely to be useful to practitioners and researchers. The iterative steps in the systematic review process will be the focus of this article. Findings from this review will be used to develop best-practice guidelines for stakeholders such as policy makers and service providers to improve the nutritional quality of food provided in the homeless sector.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This mixed methods systematic review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42021289063.

摘要

背景

评估提供给无家可归人群的食物的营养质量的研究表明,这些食物在微量营养素方面存在不足,而在脂肪、糖和盐方面则存在过剩。在西方国家,廉价、高热量但营养贫乏的食物的供应改变了无家可归人群的特征,使他们从主要体重不足转变为肥胖。许多因素影响提供给无家可归人群的食物的营养质量,例如预算和时间限制、食物捐赠和有限的设备。除了慈善餐食计划外,这些人群的营养摄入量不太可能得到满足,因此这些餐食的营养质量至关重要。本综述将综合使用混合方法文献,以了解影响提供给无家可归人群的食物的营养质量的决定因素。

方法

本混合方法系统综述将包括来自欧洲、北美和大洋洲的英语实证研究。选择了以下电子数据库进行本综述:SCOPUS、EMBASE、PsycINFO、EBSCOHost SocIndex 和 CINAHL。还将搜索灰色文献数据库 OpenGrey 和 ProQuest。使用混合方法评价工具进行质量评价。将有两名独立的评审员参与研究选择、数据提取和质量评价。如有冲突,将由第三名评审员解决。将采用主题综合法。

讨论

结果将根据健康决定因素模型进行组织,以突出可能有效的改变领域,从而使其更有可能对实践者和研究人员有用。本文将重点介绍系统评价过程中的迭代步骤。本综述的结果将用于为利益相关者(如政策制定者和服务提供者)制定最佳实践指南,以改善无家可归者部门提供的食物的营养质量。

系统评价注册

本混合方法系统综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中注册:CRD42021289063。