Allen Institute, Seattle, United States.
Elife. 2023 Jul 11;12:e85550. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85550.
Nullius in verba ('trust no one'), chosen as the motto of the Royal Society in 1660, implies that independently verifiable observations-rather than authoritative claims-are a defining feature of empirical science. As the complexity of modern scientific instrumentation has made exact replications prohibitive, sharing data is now essential for ensuring the trustworthiness of one's findings. While embraced in spirit by many, in practice open data sharing remains the exception in contemporary systems neuroscience. Here, we take stock of the Allen Brain Observatory, an effort to share data and metadata associated with surveys of neuronal activity in the visual system of laboratory mice. Data from these surveys have been used to produce new discoveries, to validate computational algorithms, and as a benchmark for comparison with other data, resulting in over 100 publications and preprints to date. We distill some of the lessons learned about open surveys and data reuse, including remaining barriers to data sharing and what might be done to address these.
“不要盲从他人(Nullius in verba)”,这句于 1660 年被英国皇家学会选为座右铭,意味着可被独立验证的观察——而非权威断言——是经验科学的一个决定性特征。由于现代科学仪器的复杂性使得精确复制变得困难重重,因此数据共享对于确保研究结果的可信度至关重要。尽管许多人在精神上接受了这一理念,但在实践中,开放数据共享在当代系统神经科学中仍然是例外。在这里,我们来评估艾伦脑科学研究所的工作,该研究所致力于共享与实验室小鼠视觉系统神经元活动调查相关的数据和元数据。这些调查的数据被用于产生新的发现,验证计算算法,并作为与其他数据进行比较的基准,迄今为止已产生了 100 多篇出版物和预印本。我们总结了一些关于开放调查和数据再利用的经验教训,包括数据共享的遗留障碍以及可以采取哪些措施来解决这些障碍。