Leducq Sophie, Maruani Annabel, Bodemer Christine, Biscardi Sandra, Boccara Olivia, Chinazzo Marie-France, Mahé Emmanuel, Plantin Patrice, Fraitag Sylvie, Mazereeuw-Hautier Juliette, Chiaverini Christine, Lemelle Irene, Bessis Didier, Bourrat Emmanuelle, Mallet Stéphanie, Bonniaud Bertille, Grall-Lerosey Martine, Martin Ludovic, Boralevi Franck, Piram Maryam
Department of Dermatology and Reference Center for Rare Diseases and Vascular Malformations (MAGEC), Unit of Pediatric Dermatology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Universities of Tours and Nantes, INSERM 1246-SPHERE, , Tours, France.
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;182(9):4133-4141. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05098-7. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
The purpose of the study is to highlight clinical signs that are either suggestive of or against the diagnosis of AHEI to improve diagnosis and management. The medical records of children under 3 years old diagnosed with AHEI were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and photographs were reviewed by three independent experts, and the cases were classified as probable, doubtful, or unclear AHEI. Of the 69 cases of children diagnosed with AHEI included in 22 centers, 40 were classified as probable, 22 as doubtful, and 7 as unclear. The median age of patients with probable AHEI was 11 months [IQR 9-15], and they were in overall good condition (n = 33/40, 82.5%). The morphology of the purpura was targetoid in 75% of cases (n = 30/40) and ecchymotic in 70% of cases (n = 28/40) and affected mostly the legs (n = 39/40, 97%), the arms (n = 34/40, 85%), and the face (n = 33/40, 82.5%). Edema was observed in 95% of cases and affected mostly the hands (n = 36/38, 95%) and feet (n = 28/38, 74%). Pruritus was absent in all patients with probable AHEI and described for 6/21 with doubtful AHEI (29%). AHEI was the original diagnosis in only 24 patients (n = 24/40, 60%). The major differential diagnoses were purpura fulminans and urticaria multiforme. Conclusion: AHEI, which the diagnosis is made on clinical findings, is often misdiagnosed. Purpuric lesions localized on the face/ears, arms/forearms, and thighs/legs with edema of the hands without pruritus in a young child with a good overall condition are highly suggestive of AHEI. What is Known: •Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) is a cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis affecting children under 3 years old. •Appropriate diagnosis is important to distinguish this benign disease from more serious diseases to avoid investigations and treatments, iatrogenic harm and unnecessary follow-up. What is New: •AHEI is an uncommon disorder often misdiagnosed by pediatricians and dermatologists. •Purpuric lesions localized on the face/ears, arms/forearms, and thighs/legs with edema of the hands without pruritus in an infant with a good overall condition are highly suggestive of AHEI.
本研究的目的是突出提示或排除急性出血性水肿性婴儿病(AHEI)诊断的临床体征,以改善诊断和管理。对诊断为AHEI的3岁以下儿童的病历进行回顾性分析。三名独立专家对临床数据和照片进行了评估,并将病例分为可能、可疑或不明确的AHEI。在22个中心纳入的69例诊断为AHEI的儿童中,40例为可能病例,22例为可疑病例,7例为不明确病例。可能患有AHEI的患者的中位年龄为11个月[四分位间距9 - 15],总体状况良好(n = 33/40,82.5%)。紫癜形态在75%的病例中呈靶形(n = 30/40),在70%的病例中呈瘀斑样(n = 28/40),主要累及腿部(n = 39/40,97%)、手臂(n = 34/40,85%)和面部(n = 33/40,82.5%)。95%的病例观察到水肿,主要累及手部(n = 36/38,95%)和足部(n = 28/38,74%)。所有可能患有AHEI的患者均无瘙痒,21例可疑AHEI患者中有6例(29%)有瘙痒症状。最初诊断为AHEI的仅24例患者(n = 24/40,60%)。主要鉴别诊断为暴发性紫癜和多形性荨麻疹。结论:AHEI主要依据临床症状诊断,常被误诊。在总体状况良好的幼儿中,紫癜性皮损局限于面部/耳部、手臂/前臂和大腿/腿部,伴有手部水肿且无瘙痒,高度提示AHEI。已知信息:•婴儿急性出血性水肿(AHEI)是一种影响3岁以下儿童的皮肤白细胞碎裂性血管炎。•正确诊断对于将这种良性疾病与更严重的疾病区分开来很重要,以避免检查和治疗、医源性伤害及不必要的随访。新发现:•AHEI是一种罕见疾病,常被儿科医生和皮肤科医生误诊。•在总体状况良好的婴儿中,紫癜性皮损局限于面部/耳部、手臂/前臂和大腿/腿部,伴有手部水肿且无瘙痒,高度提示AHEI。