St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Dec 1;117(5):1125-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.077. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
Brachytherapy with episcleral plaques is the most common primary tumor treatment for uveal melanoma. This study aimed to compare the risk of tumor recurrence and metastatic death between 2 frequently used ruthenium 106 plaque designs: CCB (20.2 mm) and CCA (15.3 mm).
Data were obtained from 1387 consecutive patients treated at St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 1981 and 2022 (439 with CCA and 948 with CCB plaques). During the period, scleral transillumination was performed to delineate tumor margins before plaque insertion, but accurate plaque positioning was not verified after scleral attachment, and no minimum scleral dose was used.
Patients treated with CCA plaques had smaller tumors than those treated with CCB plaques (mean diameter, 8.6 vs 10.5 mm; P < .001). There were no differences in patient sex, age, tumor distance to the optic disc, tumor apex dose, dose rate, or in rates of ciliary body involvement, eccentric plaque placement, or adjunct transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT). The average difference between plaque and tumor diameter was greater with the CCB plaque, and a smaller difference was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence. The 15-year incidence of tumor recurrence was 28% and 15% after treatment with CCA and CCB plaques, respectively (competing risk analysis, P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a lower risk for tumor recurrence with CCB plaques (hazard ratio, 0.50). Similarly, patients treated with CCB plaques had a lower risk for uveal melanoma-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77). The risk for either outcome was not lower for patients treated with adjunct TTT. Uni- and multivariate time-dependent Cox regressions demonstrated that tumor recurrence was associated with uveal melanoma-related and all-cause mortality.
Compared with 20-mm plaques, brachytherapy with 15-mm ruthenium plaques is associated with a higher risk for tumor recurrence and death. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by increasing safety margins and implementing effective methods to verify accurate plaque positioning.
巩膜敷贴器内放射性敷贴治疗是葡萄膜黑色素瘤的最常见的原发性肿瘤治疗方法。本研究旨在比较两种常用的钌 106 敷贴器设计(CCA 20.2mm 和 CCB 15.3mm)治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的肿瘤复发和转移性死亡风险。
数据来自于 1981 年至 2022 年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩圣埃里克眼科医院接受治疗的 1387 例连续患者(CCA 组 439 例,CCB 组 948 例)。在此期间,在插入敷贴器之前,通过巩膜透照法来描绘肿瘤边界,但在巩膜固定后并未对敷贴器的位置进行精确验证,也未使用最小巩膜剂量。
与 CCA 组相比,CCA 组患者的肿瘤更小(平均直径分别为 8.6mm 和 10.5mm;P<0.001)。两组患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤距视盘的距离、肿瘤尖端剂量、剂量率、睫状体受累、偏心敷贴器放置或辅助经瞳孔温热疗法(TTT)的比例无差异。CCB 组的敷贴器和肿瘤直径之间的平均差值较大,差值较小是肿瘤复发的独立预测因素。CCA 和 CCB 组的 15 年肿瘤复发率分别为 28%和 15%(竞争风险分析,P<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,CCB 组肿瘤复发风险较低(风险比,0.50)。同样,CCB 组患者的葡萄膜黑色素瘤相关死亡率也较低(风险比,0.77)。接受辅助 TTT 治疗的患者,两种结果的风险均未降低。单变量和多变量时间依赖性 Cox 回归表明,肿瘤复发与葡萄膜黑色素瘤相关和全因死亡率相关。
与 20mm 敷贴器相比,15mm 钌敷贴器放射性敷贴治疗与肿瘤复发和死亡风险增加相关。通过增加安全边际并实施有效方法来验证准确的敷贴器位置,可以避免这些不良后果。