• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架辅助治疗颅内动脉瘤后双联抗血小板治疗时间与缺血性卒中风险的关系(DAPTS ACE 登记研究)。

Relation between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and risk of ischemic stroke after stent-assisted treatment of cerebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE-registry).

机构信息

Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Stroke Neurology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jun 17;16(7):691-697. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020495.

DOI:10.1136/jnis-2023-020495
PMID:37433663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11228190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with cerebral aneurysm who undergo stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has not been established. We aimed to clarify the association between duration of DAPT and incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with cerebral aneurysm.

METHODS

We registered patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent SACE in 27 hospitals in Japan. Those treated with DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) were eligible for inclusion in a previously reported randomized control trial (RCT). Patients who were ineligible or refused to participate to the RCT were followed-up for 15 months after SACE as the non-RCT cohort. Our study examined both the RCT and non-RCT cohorts. The primary and secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS

Among the 313 patients registered, 296 were included for analysis (of these, 136 were RCT patients and 160 were non-RCT patients). Patients who were treated with DAPT for more than 6 months (n=191) were classified as the long-term DAPT group. Those treated less than 6 months (n=105) were classified as the short-term group. The incidence of ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the long-term group (2.5 per 100 person-years) and the short-term group (3.2 per 100 person-years); nor did incidence of hemorrhagic events (0.8 and 3.2 per 100 person-years, respectively). The period of DAPT was not significantly associated with incidence rates of ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of DAPT was not associated with the incidence of ischemic stroke in the first 15 months after SACE.

摘要

背景

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SACE)治疗脑动脉瘤患者的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间尚未确定。我们旨在阐明 DAPT 持续时间与脑动脉瘤患者缺血性卒中发生率之间的关系。

方法

我们在日本的 27 家医院登记了接受 SACE 的脑动脉瘤患者。接受 DAPT(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)治疗的患者有资格参加先前报道的随机对照试验(RCT)。不符合条件或拒绝参加 RCT 的患者在 SACE 后 15 个月作为非 RCT 队列进行随访。我们的研究检查了 RCT 和非 RCT 队列。主要和次要结局是缺血性卒中和出血事件。

结果

在登记的 313 名患者中,有 296 名被纳入分析(其中 136 名是 RCT 患者,160 名是非 RCT 患者)。接受 DAPT 治疗超过 6 个月的患者(n=191)被归类为长期 DAPT 组。接受少于 6 个月治疗的患者(n=105)被归类为短期组。长期组(每 100 人年 2.5 例)和短期组(每 100 人年 3.2 例)的缺血性卒中发生率无显著差异;出血事件的发生率也没有差异(分别为每 100 人年 0.8 和 3.2 例)。DAPT 期间与缺血性卒中和出血事件的发生率均无显著相关性。

结论

在 SACE 后 15 个月内,DAPT 的持续时间与缺血性卒中的发生率无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2462/11228190/86d5de41cde3/jnis-2023-020495f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2462/11228190/02abd2604ab9/jnis-2023-020495f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2462/11228190/86d5de41cde3/jnis-2023-020495f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2462/11228190/02abd2604ab9/jnis-2023-020495f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2462/11228190/86d5de41cde3/jnis-2023-020495f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Relation between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and risk of ischemic stroke after stent-assisted treatment of cerebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE-registry).支架辅助治疗颅内动脉瘤后双联抗血小板治疗时间与缺血性卒中风险的关系(DAPTS ACE 登记研究)。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jun 17;16(7):691-697. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020495.
2
Short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted treatment of CErebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE): a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial.支架辅助治疗颅内动脉瘤的短期与长期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPTS ACE):一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jan 12;16(2):171-176. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019867.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Using Cilostazol With Aspirin or Clopidogrel: Subanalysis of the CSPS.com Trial.西洛他唑联合阿司匹林或氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗:CSPS.com 试验的亚组分析。
Stroke. 2021 Nov;52(11):3430-3439. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034378. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
One year clinical outcome of dual anti-platelet therapy with the Novel Ticagrelor plus Aspirin versus Clopidogrel plus Aspirin for Endovascular Intervention of patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: A meta-analysis.新型替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林双联抗血小板治疗与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗颅内动脉瘤血管内介入治疗的一年临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Jan;33(1):107491. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107491. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Trends in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy of Aspirin and Clopidogrel and Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Noneligible for POINT/CHANCE Trial Treatment.不符合 POINT/CHANCE 试验治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗的趋势及结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033611. Epub 2024 May 18.
7
Delayed ischemic stroke after stent-assisted coil placement in cerebral aneurysm: characteristics and optimal duration of preventative dual antiplatelet therapy.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤后迟发性缺血性卒中:预防性双联抗血小板治疗的特征和最佳持续时间。
Radiology. 2014 Oct;273(1):194-201. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140070. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
8
Risk/Benefit Tradeoff of Prolonging Dual Antiplatelet Therapy More Than 12 Months in TWILIGHT-Like High-Risk Patients After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.TWILIGHT 样高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗延长 12 个月以上的风险/获益权衡。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;133:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.07.033. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Outcomes in Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke With Versus Without Large-Artery Atherosclerosis Post Hoc Analysis of ATAMIS.抗血小板治疗双联与急性轻中度卒中伴有或不伴有大动脉粥样硬化的结局:ATAMIS 的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e036318. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036318. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
10
Clinical outcomes of patients treated using very short duration dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents: rationale and design of a prospective multicenter REIWA registry.经生物可降解聚合物药物洗脱支架置入术后采用极短疗程双联抗血小板治疗患者的临床结局:前瞻性多中心 REIWA 注册研究的原理和设计。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Oct;35(4):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00694-y. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Safety of Antiplatelet Discontinuation Following Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysms.一项关于脑动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后停用抗血小板药物安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
NeuroSci. 2025 Apr 16;6(2):34. doi: 10.3390/neurosci6020034.
2
Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.脑动脉瘤血管内治疗中的抗血小板治疗
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0016. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted treatment of CErebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE): a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial.支架辅助治疗颅内动脉瘤的短期与长期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPTS ACE):一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jan 12;16(2):171-176. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019867.
2
Long-term complications after stent assist coiling dependent on clopidogrel response.支架辅助栓塞后长期并发症取决于氯吡格雷的反应。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02270-0.
3
The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions.
颅内动脉瘤治疗技术的演变及未来方向。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Feb;45(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01543-z. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: Head to head comparison between the Neuroform Atlas and EZ stents.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤:Neuroform Atlas 支架与 EZ 支架的头对头比较。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;27(3):353-361. doi: 10.1177/1591019921989476. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Coil Embolization for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at the Dawn of Stent Era: Results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 3.支架时代初期颅内未破裂动脉瘤的线圈栓塞治疗:日本神经血管治疗登记研究(JR-NET 3)的结果。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 Feb 15;60(2):55-65. doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2019-0210. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
6
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
7
Association of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms With Clopidogrel Reactivity and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Ischemic Stroke.CYP2C19 基因多态性与慢性缺血性脑卒中患者氯吡格雷反应性及临床结局的相关性研究。
Circ J. 2019 May 24;83(6):1385-1393. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1386. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Relevance of Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞未破裂颅内动脉瘤后抗血小板治疗持续时间的相关性
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e699-e708. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.071. Epub 2018 May 17.
9
6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 6 个月与 12 个月或更长时间双联抗血小板治疗(SMART-DATE):一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1274-1284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30493-8. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials.经支架植入和随后双联抗血小板治疗(PRECISE-DAPT)的患者预测出血并发症的预测评分的推导和验证:来自临床试验的个体患者数据集的汇总分析。
Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1025-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5.