• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个机器人并不比另一个更有价值:探究儿童对不同类人机器人的心理状态归因。

A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children's Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots.

作者信息

Manzi Federico, Peretti Giulia, Di Dio Cinzia, Cangelosi Angelo, Itakura Shoji, Kanda Takayuki, Ishiguro Hiroshi, Massaro Davide, Marchetti Antonella

机构信息

Research Unit on Theory of Mind, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011
PMID:33101099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7554578/
Abstract

Recent technological developments in robotics has driven the design and production of different humanoid robots. Several studies have highlighted that the presence of human-like physical features could lead both adults and children to anthropomorphize the robots. In the present study we aimed to compare the attribution of mental states to two humanoid robots, NAO and Robovie, which differed in the degree of anthropomorphism. Children aged 5, 7, and 9 years were required to attribute mental states to the NAO robot, which presents more human-like characteristics compared to the Robovie robot, whose physical features look more mechanical. The results on mental state attribution as a function of children's age and robot type showed that 5-year-olds have a greater tendency to anthropomorphize robots than older children, regardless of the type of robot. Moreover, the findings revealed that, although children aged 7 and 9 years attributed a certain degree of human-like mental features to both robots, they attributed greater mental states to NAO than Robovie compared to younger children. These results generally show that children tend to anthropomorphize humanoid robots that also present some mechanical characteristics, such as Robovie. Nevertheless, age-related differences showed that they should be endowed with physical characteristics closely resembling human ones to increase older children's perception of human likeness. These findings have important implications for the design of robots, which also needs to consider the user's target age, as well as for the generalizability issue of research findings that are commonly associated with the use of specific types of robots.

摘要

机器人技术的最新发展推动了不同类人机器人的设计与生产。多项研究强调,类人身体特征的存在可能会使成年人和儿童都将机器人拟人化。在本研究中,我们旨在比较对两款拟人化程度不同的类人机器人NAO和Robovie的心理状态归因。要求5岁、7岁和9岁的儿童对NAO机器人进行心理状态归因,与身体特征看起来更具机械感的Robovie机器人相比,NAO呈现出更多类人特征。作为儿童年龄和机器人类型函数的心理状态归因结果表明,无论机器人类型如何,5岁儿童比年龄较大的儿童更倾向于将机器人拟人化。此外,研究结果显示,尽管7岁和9岁的儿童都赋予了两款机器人一定程度的类人心理特征,但与年幼儿童相比,他们赋予NAO的心理状态比Robovie更多。这些结果总体表明,儿童倾向于将具有一些机械特征的类人机器人拟人化,比如Robovie。然而,与年龄相关的差异表明,应该赋予它们与人类极为相似的身体特征,以增强年龄较大儿童对类人性的感知。这些发现对机器人设计具有重要意义,机器人设计还需要考虑用户的目标年龄,同时对于通常与特定类型机器人使用相关的研究结果的普遍性问题也具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0569/7554578/96c32bd220b7/fpsyg-11-02011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0569/7554578/e9fc29db5e4c/fpsyg-11-02011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0569/7554578/96c32bd220b7/fpsyg-11-02011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0569/7554578/e9fc29db5e4c/fpsyg-11-02011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0569/7554578/96c32bd220b7/fpsyg-11-02011-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children's Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots.一个机器人并不比另一个更有价值:探究儿童对不同类人机器人的心理状态归因。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011. eCollection 2020.
2
"Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot.“Robovie,你现在得进衣橱了”:儿童与类人机器人的社会和道德关系。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):303-14. doi: 10.1037/a0027033.
3
Anthropomorphism of Robots: Study of Appearance and Agency.机器人拟人化:外观与能动性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 10;6(2):e12629. doi: 10.2196/12629.
4
Preschoolers' anthropomorphizing of robots: Do human-like properties matter?学龄前儿童对机器人的拟人化:类人属性重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 6;13:1102370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1102370. eCollection 2022.
5
Robots Are Not All the Same: Young Adults' Expectations, Attitudes, and Mental Attribution to Two Humanoid Social Robots.机器人并非千篇一律:年轻人对两款人形社交机器人的期望、态度和心理归因。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):307-314. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0162. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Opinion attribution improves motivation to exchange subjective opinions with humanoid robots.观点归属提高了与类人机器人交流主观观点的积极性。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Feb 19;11:1175879. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1175879. eCollection 2024.
7
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.利益相关者认知对老年护理用人形机器人使用的影响:互动后横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617.
8
Between living and nonliving: Young children's animacy judgments and reasoning about humanoid robots.活与非活之间:幼儿对人形机器人的能动性判断和推理。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 28;14(6):e0216869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216869. eCollection 2019.
9
Young Children's Indiscriminate Helping Behavior Toward a Humanoid Robot.幼儿对人形机器人的随意帮助行为。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00239. eCollection 2020.
10
A Study on the Effectiveness of IT Application Education for Older Adults by Interaction Method of Humanoid Robots.《基于仿人机器人交互方法的老年人信息技术应用教育效果研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710988.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's attribution of mental states to humans and social robots assessed with the Theory of Mind Scale.运用心理理论量表评估儿童对人类和社交机器人的心理状态归因。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 10;15(1):16357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96229-7.
2
Factors influencing subjective opinion attribution to conversational robots.影响对话机器人主观意见归因的因素。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Apr 16;12:1521169. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1521169. eCollection 2025.
3
A child-robot theater afterschool program can promote children's conceptualization of social robots' mental capacities and engagement in learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Social robots for education: A review.社交机器人在教育中的应用:综述。
Sci Robot. 2018 Aug 15;3(21). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.
2
The Psychosocial Fuzziness of Fear in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Era and the Role of Robots.新冠疫情时代恐惧的社会心理模糊性及机器人的作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:2245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02245. eCollection 2020.
3
The understanding of congruent and incongruent referential gaze in 17-month-old infants: an eye-tracking study comparing human and robot.17 个月大婴儿对一致和不一致参照性注视的理解:一项比较人类和机器人的眼动研究
一个儿童与机器人剧场课外项目可以促进儿童对社交机器人心理能力的概念化理解以及他们参与学习的积极性。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Mar 14;12:1529421. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1529421. eCollection 2025.
4
Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review.社交机器人在婴儿和幼儿社会和认知发展研究中的应用:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303704. eCollection 2024.
5
Opinion attribution improves motivation to exchange subjective opinions with humanoid robots.观点归属提高了与类人机器人交流主观观点的积极性。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Feb 19;11:1175879. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1175879. eCollection 2024.
6
Ageing society and the challenge for social robotics: A systematic review of Socially Assistive Robotics for MCI patients.老龄化社会与社会机器人的挑战:针对轻度认知障碍患者的社会辅助机器人的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0293324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293324. eCollection 2023.
7
Virtual agents and risk-taking behavior in adolescence: the twofold nature of nudging.虚拟代理与青少年的冒险行为:助推的双重性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38399-w.
8
The Effects of Social Presence and Familiarity on Children-Robot Interactions.社会存在感和熟悉度对儿童与机器人互动的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;23(9):4231. doi: 10.3390/s23094231.
9
Development and validation of the Attribution of Mental States Questionnaire (AMS-Q): A reference tool for assessing anthropomorphism.心理状态归因问卷(AMS-Q)的编制与验证:一种评估拟人化的参考工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 16;14:999921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.999921. eCollection 2023.
10
Preschoolers' anthropomorphizing of robots: Do human-like properties matter?学龄前儿童对机器人的拟人化:类人属性重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 6;13:1102370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1102370. eCollection 2022.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 17;10(1):11918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69140-6.
4
Objects as Communicative Mediators in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童中作为交流媒介的物体
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 17;11:1269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01269. eCollection 2020.
5
Shall I Trust You? From Child-Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships.我该信任你吗?从儿童与机器人的互动到信任关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469. eCollection 2020.
6
Tell Me a Story: Socio-Emotional Functioning, Well-Being and Problematic Smartphone Use in Adolescents With Specific Learning Disabilities.讲一个故事:特定学习障碍青少年的社会情感功能、幸福感与问题智能手机使用情况
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 6;10:2369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02369. eCollection 2019.
7
Investigating cooperation with robotic peers.研究与机器人同伴的合作。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0225028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225028. eCollection 2019.
8
Would a robot trust you? Developmental robotics model of trust and theory of mind.机器人会信任你吗?信任的发展机器人模型和心理理论。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180032. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0032.
9
Why Are There Developmental Stages in Language Learning? A Developmental Robotics Model of Language Development.为什么语言学习中存在发展阶段?一种语言发展的发展机器人模型。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;41 Suppl 1:32-51. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12390. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves.与机器人的互动:我们对自己的真实揭示。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:627-652. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958. Epub 2016 Sep 14.