Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理中关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞的比较分析:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Comparative Analysis of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Prospective Study.

作者信息

Gonçalves Luís, Santos Ana, Domingues Catia, Valente Elisabete, Gonçalves Lucia, Laranjo Marta, Lagarto Alexandra, Ferreira Elisa, Simões Vasco

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, PRT.

Anesthesiology, Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Leiria, Leiria, PRT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84887. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84887. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves patient mobility and quality of life but is also associated with postoperative pain. Effective pain management is crucial for early postoperative mobility and optimal recovery. Regional analgesia techniques such as femoral nerve block (FNB) are commonly used, but recent studies suggest the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block may provide superior hip analgesia with less motor impairment.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the effectiveness of PENG block versus FNB concerning postoperative analgesia and motor block sparing in THA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational prospective study was conducted at the Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Leiria, with data collected from January 2023 to April 2024. Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing primary THA and receiving either a PENG block or an FNB were included.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (17 in the FNB group and 38 in the PENG group) participated in this study. Both blocks effectively reduced postoperative pain scores with no significant differences between groups, demonstrating their efficacy in pain management. Postoperative knee extension motor scores were significantly higher in the PENG group compared to the FNB group (1.52 vs. 1.17, p=0.036), indicating better preservation of motor function. Similarly, leg adduction motor scores were higher in the PENG group than in the FNB group (1.50 vs. 1.29, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

The PENG block demonstrated superior motor function preservation and longer analgesia following THA compared to the FNB. The PENG block may offer a clinical advantage in facilitating earlier mobilization and improving overall recovery outcomes post-surgery.

摘要

引言

全髋关节置换术(THA)可改善患者的活动能力和生活质量,但也会带来术后疼痛。有效的疼痛管理对于术后早期活动和最佳恢复至关重要。常用的区域镇痛技术如股神经阻滞(FNB),但最近的研究表明,关节周围神经群(PENG)阻滞可能提供更好的髋关节镇痛效果,且运动功能障碍较少。

目的

本研究比较了PENG阻滞与FNB在THA患者术后镇痛和保留运动功能方面的有效性。

材料与方法

在莱里亚地区当地卫生单位进行了一项观察性前瞻性研究,收集了2023年1月至2024年4月的数据。纳入年龄在18岁及以上接受初次THA并接受PENG阻滞或FNB的患者。

结果

共有55例患者(FNB组17例,PENG组38例)参与了本研究。两种阻滞均有效降低了术后疼痛评分,组间无显著差异,表明它们在疼痛管理方面的有效性。与FNB组相比,PENG组术后膝关节伸展运动评分显著更高(1.52对1.17,p = 0.036),表明运动功能保留更好。同样,PENG组的腿部内收运动评分高于FNB组(1.50对1.29,p = 0.02)。

结论

与FNB相比,PENG阻滞在THA后表现出更好的运动功能保留和更长时间的镇痛效果。PENG阻滞在促进早期活动和改善术后总体恢复结果方面可能具有临床优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eade/12198924/045876bd8b71/cureus-0017-00000084887-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验