Département de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, AP-HP, GHU Paris Nord, DMU Neurosciences, Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité, NeuroDiderot, Inserm, Paris, France.
J Sleep Res. 2023 Dec;32(6):e13939. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13939. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
Melatonin has gained growing interest as a treatment of insomnia, despite contradictory findings, and a low level of evidence. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA criteria, to assess the efficacy of melatonin and ramelteon compared with placebo on sleep quantity and quality in insomnia disorder, while also considering factors that may impact their efficacy. This review included 22 studies, with 4875 participants, including 925 patients treated with melatonin, 1804 treated with ramelteon and 2297 receiving a placebo. Most studies evaluated the acute efficacy of prolonged release (PR) melatonin in insomnia disorder. Compared with placebo, PR melatonin appears efficacious with a small to medium effect size on subjective sleep onset latency (sSOL) (p = 0.031; weighted difference = -6.30 min), objective sleep onset latency (oSOL) (p < 0.001; weighted difference = -5.05 min), and objective sleep efficiency (oSE) (p = 0.043; weighted difference = 1.91%). For the subgroup mean age of patients ≥55, PR melatonin was efficacious on oSE with a large effect size (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 2.95%). Ramelteon was efficacious with a large effect size at 4 weeks on objective total sleep time (oTST) (p = 0.010; weighted difference = 17.9 min), subjective total sleep time (sTST) (p = 0.006; weighted difference = 11.7 min), sSOL (p = 0.009; weighted difference = -8.74 min), and oSOL (p = 0.017; weighted difference = -14 min). Regarding long-term effects, ramelteon has a large effect size on oTST (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 2.02 min) and sTST (p < 0.001; weighted difference = 14.5 min). PR melatonin and ramelteon appear efficacious compared with placebo for insomnia symptoms with PR melatonin showing mostly small to medium effect sizes. PR melatonin for individuals with a mean age ≥ 55 and ramelteon show larger effect sizes.
褪黑素作为失眠症的治疗方法越来越受到关注,尽管有相互矛盾的发现,但证据水平较低。根据 PRISMA 标准进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估褪黑素和雷美尔酮与安慰剂相比在失眠症中对睡眠数量和质量的疗效,同时还考虑了可能影响其疗效的因素。这项综述包括 22 项研究,涉及 4875 名参与者,其中 925 名患者接受褪黑素治疗,1804 名患者接受雷美尔酮治疗,2297 名患者接受安慰剂治疗。大多数研究评估了延长释放 (PR) 褪黑素在失眠症中的急性疗效。与安慰剂相比,PR 褪黑素在主观入睡潜伏期 (sSOL)(p = 0.031;加权差异 = -6.30 分钟)、客观入睡潜伏期 (oSOL)(p < 0.001;加权差异 = -5.05 分钟)和客观睡眠效率 (oSE)(p = 0.043;加权差异 = 1.91%)方面具有较小到中等的效果大小。对于患者平均年龄≥55 岁的亚组,PR 褪黑素在 oSE 方面有效,效果较大(p < 0.001;加权差异 = 2.95%)。雷美尔酮在 4 周时在客观总睡眠时间 (oTST)(p = 0.010;加权差异 = 17.9 分钟)、主观总睡眠时间 (sTST)(p = 0.006;加权差异 = 11.7 分钟)、sSOL(p = 0.009;加权差异 = -8.74 分钟)和 oSOL(p = 0.017;加权差异 = -14 分钟)方面具有较大的效果大小。关于长期效果,雷美尔酮在 oTST(p < 0.001;加权差异 = 2.02 分钟)和 sTST(p < 0.001;加权差异 = 14.5 分钟)方面具有较大的效果大小。与安慰剂相比,PR 褪黑素和雷美尔酮对失眠症状有效,PR 褪黑素的效果大多为小到中等。PR 褪黑素对于平均年龄≥55 岁的个体和雷美尔酮显示出更大的效果大小。