Suppr超能文献

2000-2019 年美国县级收入不平等、社会流动性与绝望死亡

County-Level Income Inequality, Social Mobility, and Deaths of Despair in the US, 2000-2019.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Institute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323030. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23030.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Increasing mortality from suicide, drug overdose, and alcohol-related liver disease (collectively referred to as deaths of despair) is a critical public health crisis. Income inequality and social mobility have been separately associated with all-cause mortality; however, no studies have examined their interaction with these preventable deaths.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the interaction between income inequality and social mobility with deaths of despair among working-age Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White populations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER (Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database on county-level deaths of despair from 2000 to 2019 across racial and ethnic groups. Statistical analysis was performed from January 8 to May 20, 2023.

EXPOSURES

The primary exposure of interest was county-level income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient. Another exposure was race- and ethnicity-specific absolute social mobility. Tertiles for the Gini coefficient and social mobility were created to evaluate the dose-response association.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were adjusted risk ratios (RRs) of deaths from suicide, drug overdose, and alcoholic liver disease. The interaction between income inequality and social mobility was formally tested on both the additive and multiplicative scales.

RESULTS

The sample included 788 counties for Hispanic populations, 1050 counties for non-Hispanic Black populations, and 2942 counties for non-Hispanic White populations. Over the study period, 152 350, 149 589, and 1 250 156 deaths of despair were recorded for working-age Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White populations, respectively. Compared with the reference group (counties with low income inequality and high social mobility), counties with greater income inequality (high inequality: RR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.24-1.29] for Hispanic populations; RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.20] for non-Hispanic Black populations; and RR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.21-1.23] for non-Hispanic White populations) or less social mobility (low mobility: RR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.76-1.82] for Hispanic populations; RR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.61-1.67] for non-Hispanic Black populations; and RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.38-1.39] for non-Hispanic White populations) had higher RRs for deaths of despair. In counties with high income inequality and low social mobility, positive interactions were observed on the additive scale for Hispanic populations (relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.17-0.37]), non-Hispanic Black populations (RERI, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.30-0.42]), and non-Hispanic White populations (RERI, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.09-0.12]). In contrast, positive interactions on the multiplicative scale were found only for non-Hispanic Black populations (ratio of RRs, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.18-1.31]) and non-Hispanic White populations (ratio of RRs, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]), but not for Hispanic populations (ratio of RRs, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.04]). In the sensitivity analyses using continuous Gini coefficient and social mobility, a positive interaction was observed between higher income inequality and lower social mobility with deaths of despair on both the additive and multiplicative scales for all 3 racial and ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that the joint exposure of unequal income distribution and lack of social mobility was associated with additional risks for deaths of despair, suggesting that addressing the underlying social and economic conditions is crucial in responding to the epidemic of deaths of despair.

摘要

重要性

自杀、药物过量和酒精性肝病相关死亡(统称为绝望死亡)的死亡率不断上升,这是一个严重的公共卫生危机。收入不平等和社会流动性已分别与全因死亡率相关;然而,尚无研究探讨它们与这些可预防死亡之间的相互作用。

目的

评估收入不平等和社会流动性与工作年龄的西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人人群中绝望死亡之间的相互作用。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了疾病控制与预防中心 WONDER(广泛在线数据用于流行病学研究)数据库中 2000 年至 2019 年期间种族和族裔群体中绝望死亡的县一级数据。统计分析于 2023 年 1 月 8 日至 5 月 20 日进行。

暴露因素

主要暴露因素是县一级的收入不平等,用基尼系数衡量。另一个暴露因素是种族和族裔特有的绝对社会流动性。基尼系数和社会流动性的三分位数用于评估剂量反应关联。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是自杀、药物过量和酒精性肝病导致的死亡的调整后风险比(RR)。在加性和乘法尺度上正式测试了收入不平等和社会流动性之间的相互作用。

结果

样本包括西班牙裔人群的 788 个县、非西班牙裔黑人人群的 1050 个县和非西班牙裔白人人群的 2942 个县。在研究期间,记录了工作年龄的西班牙裔人群、非西班牙裔黑人人群和非西班牙裔白人人群中分别有 152350、149589 和 1250156 例绝望死亡。与参考组(收入不平等低、社会流动性高的县)相比,收入不平等程度较高的县(高不平等:RR,1.26[95%CI,1.24-1.29],西班牙裔人群;RR,1.18[95%CI,1.15-1.20],非西班牙裔黑人人群;RR,1.22[95%CI,1.21-1.23],非西班牙裔白人人群)或社会流动性较低的县(低流动:RR,1.79[95%CI,1.76-1.82],西班牙裔人群;RR,1.64[95%CI,1.61-1.67],非西班牙裔黑人人群;RR,1.38[95%CI,1.38-1.39],非西班牙裔白人人群)的绝望死亡风险更高。在收入不平等程度高、社会流动性低的县,观察到西班牙裔人群(相对超额风险比[RERI],0.27[95%CI,0.17-0.37])、非西班牙裔黑人人群(RERI,0.36[95%CI,0.30-0.42])和非西班牙裔白人人群(RERI,0.10[95%CI,0.09-0.12])在加性尺度上存在正交互作用。相比之下,仅在非西班牙裔黑人人群(RR 比值,1.24[95%CI,1.18-1.31])和非西班牙裔白人人群(RR 比值,1.03[95%CI,1.02-1.05])中发现了乘法尺度上的正交互作用,但在西班牙裔人群中未发现(RR 比值,0.98[95%CI,0.93-1.04])。在使用连续基尼系数和社会流动性的敏感性分析中,在所有 3 个种族和族裔群体中,在加性和乘法尺度上,收入不平等程度较高和社会流动性较低与绝望死亡之间均存在正交互作用。

结论和相关性

这项横断面研究发现,收入分配不均和社会流动性不足的联合暴露与绝望死亡的风险增加相关,这表明解决潜在的社会和经济条件对于应对绝望死亡的流行至关重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验