• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国社会流动性与收入相关的寿命差距的关联:一项基于县水平的横断面研究。

Association of Social Mobility With the Income-Related Longevity Gap in the United States: A Cross-Sectional, County-Level Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):429-436. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6532.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6532
PMID:31961379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6990844/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite substantial research, the drivers of the widening gap in life expectancy between rich and poor individuals in the United States-known as the longevity gap-remain unknown. The hypothesis of this study is that social mobility may play an important role in explaining the longevity gap.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether social mobility is associated with income-related differences in life expectancy in the United States.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional, ecological study used data from 1559 counties in the United States to assess the association of social mobility with average life expectancy at age 40 years by sex and income quartile among adult men and women over the period of January 2000 through December 2014. Bayesian generalized linear multilevel regression models were used to estimate the association, with adjustment for a range of socioeconomic, demographic, and health care system characteristics.

EXPOSURES

County-level social mobility, here operationalized as the association of the income rank of individuals born during the period of January 1980 through December 1982 (based on tax record data, averaged over the period January 2010 through December 2012) with the income ranks of their parents (averaged over the period January 1996 through December 2000) using the location where the parent first claimed the child as a dependent at age 15 years to identify counties.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was life expectancy at age 40 years by sex and income quartile.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 1559 counties, which represented 93% of the US population in 2000. Each 1-SD increase in social mobility-equivalent to the difference between a low-mobility state, such as Alabama (ranked 49th on this measure), and a higher-mobility state, such as Massachusetts (ranked 23rd on this measure)-was associated with a 0.38-year (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.29-0.47) and a 0.29-year (95% CrI, 0.21-0.38) increase in county-level life expectancy among men and women, respectively, in the lowest income quartile. Estimates for life expectancies among county residents in the highest income quartile were smaller in magnitude and not robust to covariate adjustment (men: 0.10-year [95% CrI, -0.02 to 0.22] increase; women: 0.08-year [95% CrI, -0.05 to 0.20] increase). Increasing social mobility in all counties to the value of the highest social mobility county was associated with decreases in the life expectancy gap between the highest and lowest income quartiles by 1.4 (95% CrI, 0.7-2.1) years for men and 1.1 (95% CrI, 0.5-1.6) years for women nationally, representing a 20% decrease.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, higher county-level social mobility was associated with smaller county-level gaps in life expectancy by income. These findings motivate further investigation of causal relationships between policies that shift social mobility and health outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2806/6990844/27cc38e21aa1/jamainternmed-180-429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2806/6990844/27cc38e21aa1/jamainternmed-180-429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2806/6990844/27cc38e21aa1/jamainternmed-180-429-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

尽管进行了大量研究,但美国贫富个体之间预期寿命差距(即长寿差距)不断扩大的原因仍不得而知。本研究的假设是,社会流动性可能在解释长寿差距方面发挥重要作用。

目的

评估社会流动性是否与美国与收入相关的预期寿命差异相关。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面、生态学研究使用了美国 1559 个县的数据,评估了社会流动性与 2000 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间成年男性和女性中按性别和收入四分位数划分的 40 岁时平均预期寿命之间的关联,其中包括社会流动性与收入排名之间的关联。在此操作中,个体在 1980 年 1 月至 1982 年 12 月期间出生(基于纳税记录数据,2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间平均)与父母的收入排名(1996 年 1 月至 2000 年 12 月期间平均),使用父母首次在 15 岁时将孩子作为受抚养人申报的地点来确定县。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是按性别和收入四分位数划分的 40 岁时的预期寿命。

结果

样本包括 1559 个县,占 2000 年美国人口的 93%。社会流动性每增加 1 个标准差(相当于从低流动性州,如阿拉巴马州(该州在这项衡量标准中排名第 49 位)到更高流动性州,如马萨诸塞州(该州在这项衡量标准中排名第 23 位)之间的差异)与男性和女性的县一级预期寿命分别增加 0.38 岁(95%可信区间[CrI],0.29-0.47)和 0.29 岁(95% CrI,0.21-0.38),分别在收入最低的四分位数中。在收入最高的四分位数中,县居民预期寿命的估计值幅度较小,且不受协变量调整的影响(男性:0.10 岁[95% CrI,-0.02 至 0.22]增加;女性:0.08 岁[95% CrI,-0.05 至 0.20]增加)。所有县的社会流动性增加到最高社会流动性县的水平,与最高和最低收入四分位数之间的预期寿命差距减少了 1.4 岁(95% CrI,0.7-2.1),男性为 1.1 岁(95% CrI,0.5-1.6),女性为 1.1 岁。全国范围内减少了 1.1 岁(95% CrI,0.5-1.6),全国范围内减少了 1.1 岁(95% CrI,0.5-1.6),这代表了 20%的降幅。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,较高的县一级社会流动性与按收入划分的县一级预期寿命差距较小相关。这些发现促使进一步调查改变社会流动性和健康结果的政策之间的因果关系。

相似文献

1
Association of Social Mobility With the Income-Related Longevity Gap in the United States: A Cross-Sectional, County-Level Study.美国社会流动性与收入相关的寿命差距的关联:一项基于县水平的横断面研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):429-436. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6532.
2
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014.2001 - 2014年美国收入与预期寿命之间的关联
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4226.
3
Particulate matter air pollution and national and county life expectancy loss in the USA: A spatiotemporal analysis.颗粒物空气污染与美国的国家和县级预期寿命损失:时空分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23;16(7):e1002856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002856. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Inequalities in Life Expectancy Among US Counties, 1980 to 2014: Temporal Trends and Key Drivers.1980年至2014年美国各县预期寿命的不平等:时间趋势和主要驱动因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0918.
5
The reversal of fortunes: trends in county mortality and cross-county mortality disparities in the United States.命运的逆转:美国各县死亡率趋势及县际死亡率差异
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 22;5(4):e66. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050066.
6
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States.美国医疗补助扩张与阿片类药物过量死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19066.
7
Association of Household Income With Life Expectancy and Cause-Specific Mortality in Norway, 2005-2015.挪威 2005-2015 年家庭收入与预期寿命和特定原因死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1916-1925. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4329.
8
County-Level Income Inequality, Social Mobility, and Deaths of Despair in the US, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年美国县级收入不平等、社会流动性与绝望死亡
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323030. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23030.
9
Countervailing effects of income, air pollution, smoking, and obesity on aging and life expectancy: population-based study of U.S. Counties.收入、空气污染、吸烟和肥胖对衰老及预期寿命的综合影响:基于美国各县人口的研究
Environ Health. 2016 Aug 12;15(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0168-2.
10
Factors Associated With Cancer Disparities Among Low-, Medium-, and High-Income US Counties.与美国低收入、中收入和高收入县癌症差异相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183146. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3146.

引用本文的文献

1
Equality of opportunity and mortality around the world: implications for global public health.世界各地的机会平等与死亡率:对全球公共卫生的影响。
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2540167. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2540167. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Economic inequality, intergenerational mobility, and life expectancy.经济不平等、代际流动性与预期寿命。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Feb;366:117682. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117682. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Upward Mobility Context and Health Outcomes and Behaviors during Transition to Adulthood: The Intersectionality of Race and Sex.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Automotive Assembly Plant Closures and Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.汽车装配厂关闭与美国阿片类药物过量死亡率的关系:双重差分分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5686.
2
College affirmative action bans and smoking and alcohol use among underrepresented minority adolescents in the United States: A difference-in-differences study.美国高校平权行动禁令与代表性不足少数族裔青少年的吸烟和饮酒行为:一项差分法研究
PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 18;16(6):e1002821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002821. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
成年转型期的向上流动背景、健康结果与行为:种族与性别的交叉性
J Health Soc Behav. 2025 Mar;66(1):18-37. doi: 10.1177/00221465231223944. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals and Call to Action to Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.美国心脏协会 2030 年紧急心血管护理影响目标和行动呼吁,以改善心脏骤停结局:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e914-e933. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001196. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Rural Health Disparities in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunologic Diseases: The Current State and Future Direction for Clinical Care and Research.农村地区过敏、哮喘和免疫性疾病的健康差异:临床护理与研究的现状及未来方向
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Feb;12(2):334-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.030. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
6
The heterogeneous well-being effects of intergenerational mobility perceptions.代际流动感知的异质福利效应。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Feb;29(2):99-112. doi: 10.1177/13591053231187345. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
County-Level Income Inequality, Social Mobility, and Deaths of Despair in the US, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年美国县级收入不平等、社会流动性与绝望死亡
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323030. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23030.
8
Downward income mobility among individuals with poor initial health is linked with higher cardiometabolic risk.初始健康状况较差的个体的收入向下流动与较高的心血管代谢风险相关。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 9;1(1):pgac012. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac012. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Association Between Racial Wealth Inequities and Racial Disparities in Longevity Among US Adults and Role of Reparations Payments, 1992 to 2018.种族财富不平等与美国成年人寿命差距之间的关联,以及赔偿支付在其中的作用,1992 年至 2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40519.
10
Early Exposure to County Income Mobility and Adult Individual Health in the United States.美国早期接触县域收入流动性与成年人个体健康
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 27;77(Suppl_2):S199-S208. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab240.
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.
强制性医疗保险捆绑支付计划,用于下肢关节置换和转至机构性康复治疗:一项 5 年随机试验的第一年中期分析。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):892-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12346.
4
Early-life Medicaid Coverage and Intergenerational Economic Mobility.早期生活医疗补助保险覆盖范围与代际经济流动性。
J Health Soc Behav. 2018 Jun;59(2):300-315. doi: 10.1177/0022146518771910. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.更好邻里环境对儿童的影响:来自“迁居机会”实验的新证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Apr;106(4):855-902. doi: 10.1257/aer.20150572.
6
Rethinking the health consequences of social class and social mobility.重新思考社会阶层和社会流动对健康的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:258-261. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.037. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
7
Health consequences of the US Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration programme: a quasi-experimental study.美国“童年入境暂缓遣返”(DACA)移民计划的健康后果:一项准实验研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e175-e181. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30047-6. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Economic opportunity: a determinant of health?经济机会:健康的一个决定因素?
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Nov;1(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30004-4. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
Economic opportunity, health behaviours, and health outcomes in the USA: a population-based cross-sectional study.美国的经济机会、健康行为和健康结果:基于人群的横断面研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Nov;1(1):e18-e25. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30005-6. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
10
The association between income and life expectancy revisited: deindustrialization, incarceration and the widening health gap.重新审视收入与预期寿命之间的关联:去工业化、监禁与不断扩大的健康差距。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;47(3):720-730. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx243.