Suppr超能文献

整体评估对研究生医学教育中面试和录取居民多样性的影响:系统评价方案。

Impact of holistic review on diversity of interviewed and matriculating residents in graduate medical education: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e074118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074118.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diversity in the physician workforce improves patient-centred outcomes. Patients are more likely to trust in and comply with care when seeing gender/racially concordant providers. A current emphasis on standardised metrics in academic achievement often serves as a barrier to the recruitment and retention of gender and racial minorities in medicine. Holistic review of residency applicants has been supported as a means of encouraging diversification but is not yet standardised. The current body of evidence examining the effects of holistic review on the recruitment of racial and gender minorities in surgical residencies is small. We therefore propose a systematic review to summarise the state of holistic review in graduate medical education in the USA and its impact on diversification.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our systematic review protocol has been designed with plans to report our review findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. PubMed and Embase will be searched with the assistance of a health sciences librarian with expertise in systematic review. We will include studies of graduate medical education programmes that describe the implementation of holistic review, outline the components of their holistic review process and compare proportions of under-represented minorities (URM) and women interviewed and matriculating before and after holistic review implementation. We will first report a summary of the findings regarding the operationalisation of holistic review as described by studies included. We will then pool the percentages of URM and women for interviewee and matriculant populations from each study and report the collective odds ratios of each for holistic review compared with traditional review as our primary outcome.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is a protocol for systematic review, and therefore does not involve any human subjects. Findings will be published in the form of a manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023401389.

摘要

简介

医师队伍的多样性可改善以患者为中心的治疗效果。当患者看到性别/种族相符的医护人员时,他们更有可能信任并配合治疗。目前,学术成就的标准化指标强调往往成为医学领域中招募和留住性别和少数族裔人员的障碍。全面审查住院医师申请人已被支持作为促进多样化的一种手段,但尚未标准化。目前,关于全面审查对手术住院医师中种族和性别少数群体招聘的影响的证据有限。因此,我们建议进行系统评价,以总结美国研究生医学教育中全面审查的现状及其对多样化的影响。

方法和分析

我们的系统评价方案是在计划按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准的首选报告项目的指导下设计的。将在具有系统评价专业知识的健康科学图书馆员的协助下,在 PubMed 和 Embase 上进行搜索。我们将包括描述全面审查实施情况的研究生医学教育计划的研究,概述其全面审查过程的组成部分,并比较实施全面审查前后接受采访和入学的代表性不足的少数群体(URM)和女性的比例。我们将首先报告有关纳入研究中描述的全面审查实施情况的发现摘要。然后,我们将汇总每个研究中受访者和入学者人群中 URM 和女性的百分比,并报告每个研究中与传统审查相比全面审查的综合优势比作为我们的主要结果。

伦理和传播

这项研究是系统评价的方案,因此不涉及任何人类受试者。研究结果将以提交给同行评议期刊的手稿形式发表。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023401389。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Pursing a career in academic surgery among African American medical students.非裔美国医学生从事学术外科职业。
Am J Surg. 2020 Apr;219(4):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
7
Diversity improves performance and outcomes.多样性提高绩效和结果。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;111(4):383-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验