Suppr超能文献

根据新的黄斑注视轴测量值定制的渐进多焦点镜片的视觉满意度。

Visual satisfaction with progressive addition lenses prescribed with novel foveal fixation axis measurements.

机构信息

Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.

Departamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo de Belén, 7 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011, Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 12;13(1):11262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38446-6.

Abstract

Progressive addition lens (PAL) prescription is usually conducted using the pupillary centre as a reference, which in general does not coincide with the visual axis (kappa distance), and this difference could induce undesired prismatic effects in far and near vision distances and adaptation problems. This study aimed to assess the impact on subjects' visual satisfaction with PALs prescribed based on foveal fixation axis (FFA) measurements. Two different PALs (LifeStyle 3i, Hoya Lens Iberia) were randomly prescribed [one with a customized inset (the difference between the FFA measurements (Ergofocus®, Lentitech, Spain) at far and near distances and the second with a standard inset (2.5 mm)] to be used by 71 healthy presbyopic volunteers in a prospective double-masked crossover clinical study involving one month of use of each PAL. Patients were self-classified into four groups according to their previous experience with PALs: neophyte, PAL users, PAL drop-out, and uncomfortable PAL users. Visual function and overall satisfaction with each PAL were collected and compared. Ninety-seven percent (95% CI 93-100%) of participants successfully adapted to PALs prescribed with FFA without significant differences (P = 0.26) among the study groups (100% neophyte and uncomfortable PAL users (95% CI 100% in both groups), 89% (95% CI 67-100%) PAL users and 94% (95% CI 82-100%) PAL drop-out group). There were no statistically significant differences in visual function (P > 0.05) between customized and standard inset PALs. Customized and standard inset lenses showed similar satisfaction (P > 0.42) that increased significantly (P < 0.01 without any carry-over effect) after 30 days of wear. PALs prescribed with FFA measurements showed high visual satisfaction, suggesting that these measurements are suitable for prescribing PAL adaptation processes. Additional research is necessary to assess differences in PAL users' performance with different prescription methods and lens designs.

摘要

渐进多焦点镜片(PAL)的处方通常以瞳孔中心为参考,而瞳孔中心通常与视轴(kappa 距离)不一致,这种差异可能会在远距和近距视力以及适应问题中产生不理想的棱镜效应。本研究旨在评估基于黄斑中心凹固视轴(FFA)测量值的 PAL 处方对患者视觉满意度的影响。两种不同的 PAL(豪雅 Lens Iberia 的 LifeStyle 3i)被随机处方[一种具有定制内移量(FFA 测量值(西班牙 Lentitech 的 Ergofocus®)在远距和近距之间的差异),另一种具有标准内移量(2.5 毫米)],由 71 名健康的远视志愿者在一项前瞻性双盲交叉临床试验中使用,每个 PAL 使用一个月。患者根据他们以前使用 PAL 的经验分为四组:新手、PAL 用户、PAL 放弃者和不舒适的 PAL 用户。收集并比较了每个 PAL 的视觉功能和整体满意度。97%(95%CI 93-100%)的参与者成功适应了使用 FFA 处方的 PAL,各组之间没有显著差异(P=0.26)(100%的新手和不舒适的 PAL 用户(95%CI 两组均为 100%)、89%(95%CI 67-100%)的 PAL 用户和 94%(95%CI 82-100%)的 PAL 放弃者)。定制内移量和标准内移量 PAL 之间的视觉功能没有统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。定制和标准内移量镜片的满意度相似(P>0.42),在佩戴 30 天后显著增加(无残留效应,P<0.01)。使用 FFA 测量值处方的 PAL 显示出较高的视觉满意度,表明这些测量值适合处方 PAL 适应过程。需要进一步研究以评估不同处方方法和镜片设计对 PAL 用户表现的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验