Bowers Christian A, Varela Samantha, Naftchi Alexandria F, Kazim Syed Faraz, Hall Daniel E, Ng Christina, Rawanduzy Cameron, Spirollari Eris, Vazquez Sima, Das Ankita, Graifman Gillian, Asserson Derek B, Dominguez Jose F, Kinon Merritt D, Schmidt Meic H
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque.
2School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 7;39(4):509-519. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE221020. Print 2023 Oct 1.
The objective of this paper was to compare the predictive ability of the recalibrated Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) with the 5-item modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) for postoperative outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
This study was performed using data of adult (age > 18 years) ACDF patients obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database during the years 2015-2019. Multivariate modeling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve/C-statistic calculation with the DeLong test, were performed to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of the RAI-rev and mFI-5 for 5 postoperative outcomes.
Both the RAI-rev and mFI-5 were independent predictors of increased postoperative mortality and morbidity in a cohort of 61,441 ACDF patients. In the ROC analysis for 30-day mortality prediction, C-statistics indicated a significantly better performance of the RAI-rev (C-statistic = 0.855, 95% CI 0.852-0.858) compared with the mFI-5 (C-statistic = 0.684, 95% CI 0.680-0.688) (p < 0.001, DeLong test). The results were similar for postoperative ACDF morbidity, Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications, nonhome discharge, and reoperation, demonstrating the superior discriminative ability of the RAI-rev compared with the mFI-5.
The RAI-rev demonstrates superior discrimination to the mFI-5 in predicting postoperative ACDF mortality and morbidity. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to document frailty as an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality after ACDF. The RAI-rev has conceptual fidelity to the frailty phenotype and may be more useful than the mFI-5 in preoperative ACDF risk stratification. Prospective validation of these findings is necessary, but patients with high RAI-rev scores may benefit from knowing that they might have an increased surgical risk for ACDF morbidity and mortality.
本文旨在比较重新校准的风险分析指数(RAI-rev)与5项改良虚弱指数-5(mFI-5)对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)术后结局的预测能力。
本研究使用了2015年至2019年期间从国家外科质量改进计划数据库中获取的成年(年龄>18岁)ACDF患者的数据。进行多变量建模和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,包括使用德龙检验计算曲线下面积/C统计量,以评估RAI-rev和mFI-5对5种术后结局的比较判别能力。
在一组61441例ACDF患者中,RAI-rev和mFI-5均是术后死亡率和发病率增加的独立预测因素。在30天死亡率预测的ROC分析中,C统计量表明RAI-rev的表现明显优于mFI-5(C统计量=0.855,95%CI 0.852-0.858),而mFI-5的C统计量为0.684(95%CI 0.680-0.688)(p<0.001,德龙检验)。ACDF术后发病率、Clavien-Dindo IV级并发症、非家庭出院和再次手术的结果相似,表明RAI-rev与mFI-5相比具有更高的判别能力。
RAI-rev在预测ACDF术后死亡率和发病率方面表现出比mFI-5更高的判别能力。据作者所知,这是第一项将虚弱记录为ACDF术后死亡率独立危险因素的研究。RAI-rev在概念上与虚弱表型相符,在ACDF术前风险分层中可能比mFI-5更有用。这些发现有必要进行前瞻性验证,但RAI-rev评分高的患者可能会从了解他们可能增加的ACDF发病和死亡手术风险中受益。