Suppr超能文献

比较风险分析指数和改良的 5 因素衰弱指数预测脊柱手术后 30 天发病率和死亡率。

Comparison of the Risk Analysis Index and the modified 5-factor frailty index in predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality after spine surgery.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH), Albuquerque.

2School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Apr 7;39(1):136-145. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221019. Print 2023 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Frailty's role in preoperative risk assessment in spine surgery has increased in association with the increasing size of the aging population. However, previous frailty assessment tools have significant limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive ability of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) with the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) for postoperative spine surgery morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for adults > 18 years who underwent spine surgery between 2015 and 2019. Multivariate modeling and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, including area under the curve/C-statistic calculations, were performed to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of RAI and mFI-5 on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 292,225 spine surgery patients, multivariate modeling showed that increasing RAI scores, and not increasing mFI-5 scores, were independent predictors of increased postoperative mortality for the trauma, tumor, and infection subcohorts. In the overall spine cohort, both increasing RAI and increasing mFI-5 scores were associated with increased mortality, but C-statistics indicated that the RAI (C-statistic 0.802 [95% CI 0.800-0.803], p < 0.0001, DeLong test) had superior discrimination compared with the mFI-5 (C-statistic 0.677 [95% CI 0.675-0.679], p < 0.0001, DeLong test). In subgroup analyses, the RAI had superior discriminative ability to mFI-5 for mortality in the trauma and infection groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAI demonstrates superior discrimination to the mFI-5 for predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity after spine surgery and the RAI maintains conceptual fidelity to the frailty phenotype. Patients with high RAI scores may benefit from knowing the possibility of increased surgical risk with potential spine surgery.

摘要

目的

随着老龄化人口的增加,虚弱在脊柱手术的术前风险评估中的作用日益增加。然而,以前的虚弱评估工具存在显著的局限性。本研究旨在比较风险分析指数(RAI)与 5 因素改良虚弱指数(mFI-5)对脊柱手术后发病率和死亡率的预测能力。

方法

从美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中收集了 2015 年至 2019 年间接受脊柱手术的>18 岁成年人的数据。进行多变量建模和接受者操作特征曲线分析,包括曲线下面积/C 统计计算,以评估 RAI 和 mFI-5 对术后结果的比较判别能力。

结果

在 292225 例脊柱手术患者的队列中,多变量建模显示,RAI 评分的增加,而不是 mFI-5 评分的增加,是创伤、肿瘤和感染亚组术后死亡率增加的独立预测因素。在整体脊柱队列中,RAI 和 mFI-5 评分的增加均与死亡率的增加相关,但 C 统计表明 RAI(C 统计量 0.802 [95%CI 0.800-0.803],p <0.0001,DeLong 检验)的判别能力优于 mFI-5(C 统计量 0.677 [95%CI 0.675-0.679],p <0.0001,DeLong 检验)。在亚组分析中,RAI 对创伤和感染组的死亡率的判别能力优于 mFI-5(分别为 p <0.001 和 p = 0.039)。

结论

RAI 对预测脊柱手术后的死亡率和发病率具有优于 mFI-5 的判别能力,RAI 保持了与虚弱表型的概念一致性。RAI 评分较高的患者可能会受益于了解潜在脊柱手术的手术风险增加的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验