• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同参与:与有影响力的他人共享现实与目标成功相关联。

In it together: Shared reality with instrumental others is linked to goal success.

作者信息

Elnakouri Abdo, Rossignac-Milon Maya, Krueger Kori L, Forest Amanda L, Higgins E Tory, Scholer Abigail A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo.

IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1072-1095. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000427. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000427
PMID:37439715
Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in on Sep 07 2023 (see record 2024-05962-001). In the original article, the abstract was revised. Specifically, there were errors in the the second and third sentences of the fifth paragraph of the Shared Reality section, fifth sentence of the Present Research section, An updated Figure 1 now appears in the erratum. NIO counterpart and and the specific note in Table 3, the first parenthetical text in the Procedure and Materials section in Study 2c, the phrase its NIO counterpart in the Discussion section of Study 2c, last sentence of the second paragraph of Study 3, third sentence in the third paragraph of Study 3, first sentence in the third paragraph of the Results section, the phrase their NIO counterparts in both the Self-Reported Goal Success and GPA sections of Study 4c, NIO counterpart and the specific note in Table 9, last phrase in the second paragraph in the Discussion section of Study 4, and the in-text citation of Footnote 9 in the Contribution to Understanding the Interpersonal Influences on Goal Success.] Why are some people more successful than others? In addition to individual factors (e.g. self-control), research has recently suggested that the quality of people's interpersonal relationships is crucial for success. Successful people do not just like and feel close to instrumental objects (e.g., study material, the gym), they also like and feel close to instrumental others (IOs; people who make goal success more likely). Yet instrumental people have one crucially distinct feature that instrumental objects do not: A mind of their own. We propose that while a growing body of work suggests that the sense of closeness to IOs (others who make goal success more likely) is crucial for goal success, prior work has not examined how the sense of the quality of people's relationships with IOs, and therefore goal success, likely depends on their ability to "merge minds" with them, experiencing both the goal and the world at large (i.e., shared reality) in the same way as one's IO contributes to goal success. Specifically, the present research ( = 1,326) explored (a) whether people experience shared reality-the perception of shared attitudes and judgments about the world-with IOs and (b) whether those who do so achieve greater goal success. Participants perceiving their romantic partner as instrumental for their goals experienced more shared reality with them (Study 1); participants also reported greater shared reality with IOs relative to noninstrumental others (NIO; Study 2). Higher shared reality with IOs was linked to more goal success initially, (Studies 2-4), 3-4 weeks later (Study 2c), and higher grade point averages (Study 4). These effects held when controlling for IO liking, closeness, epistemic trust, and NIO shared reality. Self-efficacy consistently mediated the effect of IO shared reality on goal success, indicating that IO shared reality may bolster people's epistemic confidence in their abilities. Overall, findings suggest that shared reality with IOs may play an important role in goal success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

[更正通知:本文的一篇勘误于2023年9月7日在线发布(见记录2024-05962-001)。在原文中,摘要进行了修订。具体而言,共享现实部分第五段的第二和第三句、当前研究部分的第五句、勘误中现在出现的更新后的图1、表3中的NIO对应项及具体注释、研究2c的程序和材料部分的第一个括号内文本、研究2c的讨论部分中的短语“其NIO对应项”、研究3第二段的最后一句、研究3第三段中的第三句、结果部分第三段的第一句、研究4c的自我报告目标成功和GPA部分中的短语“其NIO对应项”、表9中的NIO对应项及具体注释、研究4讨论部分第二段的最后一个短语以及对理解人际影响对目标成功的贡献中脚注9的文内引用存在错误。] 为什么有些人比其他人更成功?除了个人因素(如自我控制)外,最近的研究表明,人际关系的质量对成功至关重要。成功的人不仅喜欢并感觉与工具性对象(如学习材料、健身房)亲近,他们也喜欢并感觉与工具性他人(IOs;使目标更有可能成功的人)亲近。然而,工具性他人有一个工具性对象所没有的关键不同特征:他们有自己的想法。我们提出,虽然越来越多的研究表明,与IOs(使目标更有可能成功的他人)的亲近感对目标成功至关重要,但先前的研究尚未考察人们与IOs的关系质量感,进而目标成功,可能如何取决于他们与IOs“融合思维”的能力,即与IOs以相同方式体验目标和整个世界(即共享现实),因为IOs有助于目标成功。具体而言,本研究(N = 1326)探讨了:(a)人们是否与IOs体验到共享现实——对世界的共享态度和判断的感知;以及(b)那些这样做的人是否能取得更大的目标成功。将浪漫伴侣视为实现目标的工具的参与者与他们体验到了更多的共享现实(研究1);相对于非工具性他人(NIO),参与者也报告与IOs有更大程度的共享现实(研究2)。与IOs更高程度地共享现实最初与更多的目标成功相关(研究2 - 4),3 - 4周后也是如此(研究2c),并且与更高的平均绩点相关(研究4)。在控制了对IOs的喜欢、亲近感、认知信任和NIO共享现实后,这些效应依然存在。自我效能感始终介导了IO共享现实对目标成功的影响,表明IO共享现实可能增强人们对自身能力的认知信心。总体而言,研究结果表明与IOs的共享现实可能在目标成功中发挥重要作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
In it together: Shared reality with instrumental others is linked to goal success.共同参与:与有影响力的他人共享现实与目标成功相关联。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1072-1095. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000427. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Correction to Elnakouri et al. (2023).对埃尔纳库里等人(2023年)的更正。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1095. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000436. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Correction to Wurm and Schäfer (2022).勘误:Wurm 和 Schäfer(2022)。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;125(4):719. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000486.
5
Self-concept clarity lays the foundation for self-continuity: The restorative function of autobiographical memory.自我概念清晰度为自我连续性奠定基础:自传体记忆的恢复功能。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;119(4):945-959. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000259. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior.使用 26000 篇日记记录排卵周期中性欲和性行为的变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;121(2):410-431. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000208. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships.合一心智:对偶关系中的广义共享现实
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;120(4):882-911. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000266. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
9
Anger has benefits for attaining goals.愤怒有助于实现目标。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;126(4):587-602. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000350. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
10
Correction to "Digital traces of offline mobilization" by Smith et al. (2023).对史密斯等人(2023年)所著《线下动员的数字痕迹》的勘误
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Mar;126(3):460. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000390.

引用本文的文献

1
AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact.人工智能可以帮助人们感到被倾听,但人工智能的标签会削弱这种影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 2;121(14):e2319112121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319112121. Epub 2024 Mar 29.