Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;126(4):587-602. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000350. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 126(4) of (see record 2024-93961-001). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa 0000350), the first paragraph in the Method section of Study 4 has been revised. All paragraphs in the Results section of Study 4 have been revised. Table 1 and Figure 5 have been updated. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Functional accounts of emotion have guided research for decades, with the core assumption that emotions are functional-they improve outcomes for people. Based on functional accounts of emotion, we theorized that anger should improve goal attainment in the presence of challenges. In seven studies, goal attainment was assessed in situations that involved varying levels of challenges to goal attainment. Across studies, anger compared to a neutral condition resulted in behavior that facilitated greater goal attainment on tasks that involved challenges. With a goal to solve difficult puzzles, anger resulted in more puzzles correctly solved (Study 1). With a goal to attain prizes, anger increased cheating rates and numbers of unearned prizes (Study 2). With a goal to do well in a video game, anger increased scores on a game with challenges to be avoided, but not other scores (Study 3). In two studies, examining the consequences of anger in response to the challenging task that was the focus of that anger, anger decreased reaction time with goals to win trials (Study 4), and predicted making the effort to vote in two contentious elections (Study 5). With a goal to protect financial resources, anger increased action taken to prevent loss compared to a physiological arousal condition (Study 6). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
[勘误通知:本文在第 126 卷(4)中报告了一个勘误(参见记录 2024-93961-001)。在本文(https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000350)中,研究 4 的方法部分的第一段已修订。研究 4 的结果部分的所有段落均已修订。表 1 和图 5 已更新。本文的所有版本均已更正。] 几十年来,情绪的功能理论一直指导着研究,其核心假设是情绪是有功能的——它们能改善人们的结果。基于情绪的功能理论,我们推测愤怒应该在面临挑战时促进目标的实现。在七项研究中,在涉及目标实现的不同程度挑战的情境中评估了目标的实现。在所有研究中,与中性条件相比,愤怒会导致在涉及挑战的任务中更有利于目标的实现的行为。当目标是解决难题时,愤怒会导致更多的谜题被正确解决(研究 1)。当目标是获得奖品时,愤怒会增加作弊率和未获奖品的数量(研究 2)。当目标是在视频游戏中表现出色时,愤怒会增加对有挑战性的游戏的分数,但不会增加其他分数(研究 3)。在两项研究中,检验了愤怒对作为愤怒焦点的挑战性任务的后果,愤怒会减少有获胜目标的反应时间(研究 4),并预测在两次有争议的选举中投票(研究 5)。当目标是保护财务资源时,愤怒会比生理唤醒状态增加采取行动防止损失的次数(研究 6)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。