• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估儿童肥胖患者教育模式:在线健康信息质量和谷歌趋势分析。

Assessing Patterns in Childhood Obesity Patient Education: A Quality of Online Health Information and Google Trends Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Nova Southeastern University Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Child Obes. 2024 May;20(4):289-299. doi: 10.1089/chi.2023.0015. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1089/chi.2023.0015
PMID:37440174
Abstract

Childhood obesity (CO) is rapidly increasing in prevalence and developing into a health crisis of developed nations. The condition is associated with increased risk of developing various comorbidities later in life. Current treatment algorithms primarily target family education. Thus, this study aims to understand the quality of information online regarding CO and common comorbidities, determine the readability of online information, and report patterns in public interest over time using Google Trends. Four validated quality of information tools and 6 readability tools were implemented across 36 websites derived from 4 Google searches. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the associations between Google Trends' relative search volumes (RSVs) and biennial BMI-based cumulative proportion of CO. Results showed variable information quality among the websites as scores ranged from "fair" to "very poor." Using six readability formulas, no website scored at or below the sixth grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association. Google Trends' RSVs for the term "Childhood Obesity" were repeatedly increased in the months that fall in the US academic school year (October-November and February-May), and decreased within months in the US vacation periods (December-January and June-September). Search volumes were also negatively correlated with CO and pediatric type 2 diabetes prevalence. In summary, while Google Trends analysis showed that schools may play a role in increasing interest and awareness online, quality of information and readability analysis displayed that the information and its accessibility are far too variable to be reliable.

摘要

儿童肥胖症(CO)的患病率正在迅速上升,成为发达国家的健康危机。这种情况与日后发生各种合并症的风险增加有关。目前的治疗算法主要针对家庭教育。因此,本研究旨在了解有关 CO 和常见合并症的在线信息质量,确定在线信息的可读性,并使用 Google Trends 报告随时间推移的公众兴趣模式。在 36 个从 4 个 Google 搜索中得出的网站上实施了四个经过验证的信息质量工具和六个可读性工具。Pearson 相关系数用于确定 Google Trends 的相对搜索量(RSV)与基于 BMI 的 CO 累积比例的两年期之间的关联。结果表明,网站之间的信息质量存在差异,得分范围从“公平”到“非常差”。使用六个可读性公式,没有一个网站的得分低于美国医学协会推荐的六年级阅读水平。术语“儿童肥胖症”的 Google Trends RSV 在 fall 在美学校学年(十月至十一月和二月至五月)的几个月中反复增加,并在美假期(十二月至一月和六月至九月)的几个月中减少。搜索量也与 CO 和儿科 2 型糖尿病的患病率呈负相关。 总之,虽然 Google Trends 分析表明学校可能在增加在线兴趣和意识方面发挥作用,但信息质量和可读性分析表明,信息及其可访问性差异太大,不可靠。

相似文献

1
Assessing Patterns in Childhood Obesity Patient Education: A Quality of Online Health Information and Google Trends Analysis.评估儿童肥胖患者教育模式:在线健康信息质量和谷歌趋势分析。
Child Obes. 2024 May;20(4):289-299. doi: 10.1089/chi.2023.0015. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.对谷歌搜索查询及在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料可读性的系统评估
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z.
3
Evaluating the Quality, Readability, and Activity of Online Information on Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.评估脑动静脉畸形在线信息的质量、可读性及活跃度。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 26;15(9):e45984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45984. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.谷歌在线儿童青光眼信息的质量、可靠性、技术质量和可读性。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 May-Jun;61(3):198-203. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231114-01. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
The Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information on Positional Head Shape Conditions.在线体位性头型异常患者信息的质量和可读性。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1186-1194. doi: 10.1177/10556656231159972. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
7
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
8
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
9
Patient education in the digital age: An analysis of quality and readability of online information on rhinoplasty.数字化时代的患者教育:鼻整形术在线信息质量和可读性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39229. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039229.
10
Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.评估有关琼斯骨折的在线信息的可读性。
World J Methodol. 2023 Dec 20;13(5):439-445. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439.