• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚热带生态系统中蕨类植物的“收益递减”与叶面积-生物量缩放关系

"Diminishing returns" and leaf area-biomass scaling of ferns in subtropical ecosystems.

作者信息

Chen Shubing, Li Jinlong, Sun Jun, Zhong Quanlin, Hu Dandan, Cheng Dongliang

机构信息

College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 27;14:1187704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704
PMID:37441171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10333482/
Abstract

Foliage leaves are the primary photosynthetic organ of the majority of vascular plants, and their area vs. biomass scaling relationships provide valuable insights into the capacity and investment in light interception, which is critical to plant growth and performance. The "diminishing returns" hypothesis (DRH), which is based primarily on data from gymnosperms and angiosperms, posits that leaf (lamina) area scales with leaf dry mass. on average with a scaling exponent less than 1.0. However, it remains uncertain whether DRH applies to ferns or whether ecological factors affect the scaling exponents governing fern leaf morphometrics. To address this issue, 182 individuals of 28 subtropical ferns species were studied at low, medium, and high elevations (i.e., 600 m, 900 m, and 1200 m, respectively) in Mount Wuyi National Park, Jiangxi Province, China. The scaling relationships between leaf area and leaf biomass for individual and total leaf of ferns at different elevations were examined by using standardized major axis regression protocols. Analyses of the 28 fern species (using Blomberg -value protocols) indicated no phylogenetic biases among the species compositions of the three different elevations. In addition, at the individual plant level, individual leaf area (ILA) did not differ significantly among the three different elevations ( > 0.05). However, individual leaf mass (ILM) was significantly higher at 900m than at 1200m ( < 0.05), resulting in a significantly higher leaf mass per area (LMA) at the 900m elevation than at the 600m and 1200m elevations ( < 0.05). The ILA and ILM at the 900m elevation were significantly higher than at the 600m elevation ( < 0.05). At the species level, ILA and ILM did not differ significantly among the three elevations ( > 0.05). The total leaf area per individual (TLA) did not differ significantly across the different elevations ( > 0.05). However, total leaf mass per individual (TLM) did differ significantly ( < 0.05). At the individual plant level, the scaling exponents for ILA vs. ILM and TLA vs. TLM at the three different elevations were all significantly less than 1.0 ( < 0.05), which was consistent with the DRH. At the species level, the scaling exponents for the ILA vs. ILM were significantly less than 1.0 at the middle and high elevations, but not at the low elevation. The scaling exponents of the TLA and TLM were numerically highest in the middle elevation, and all were less than 1.0 for the three elevations. These results indicate that the scaling relationships of leaf area versus mass of subtropical ferns at different elevations support the DRH hypothesis. The study further informs our understanding of the resource allocation strategies of an ancient and diverse plant lineage.

摘要

叶片是大多数维管植物的主要光合器官,其面积与生物量的缩放关系为了解植物在光捕获方面的能力和投入提供了有价值的见解,而光捕获对植物生长和表现至关重要。“收益递减”假说(DRH)主要基于裸子植物和被子植物的数据,该假说认为叶(叶片)面积与叶干质量成比例,平均缩放指数小于1.0。然而,DRH是否适用于蕨类植物,或者生态因素是否会影响控制蕨类植物叶片形态测量的缩放指数,仍不确定。为了解决这个问题,在中国江西省武夷山国家级自然保护区,对28种亚热带蕨类植物的182个个体进行了低、中、高海拔(即分别为600米、900米和1200米)的研究。通过使用标准化主轴回归方法,研究了不同海拔蕨类植物个体叶和总叶的叶面积与叶生物量之间的缩放关系。对28种蕨类植物的分析(使用Blomberg值方法)表明,三种不同海拔的物种组成之间不存在系统发育偏差。此外,在个体植物水平上,三种不同海拔的个体叶面积(ILA)没有显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,900米处的个体叶质量(ILM)显著高于1200米处(P<0.05),导致900米海拔处的单位面积叶质量(LMA)显著高于600米和1200米海拔处(P<0.05)。900米海拔处的ILA和ILM显著高于600米海拔处(P<0.05)。在物种水平上,三种海拔的ILA和ILM没有显著差异(P>0.05)。不同海拔的个体总叶面积(TLA)没有显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,个体总叶质量(TLM)确实存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在个体植物水平上,三种不同海拔的ILA与ILM以及TLA与TLM的缩放指数均显著小于1.0(P<0.05),这与DRH一致。在物种水平上,ILA与ILM的缩放指数在中高海拔处显著小于1.0,但在低海拔处并非如此。TLA和TLM的缩放指数在中等海拔处数值最高,且三种海拔的缩放指数均小于1.0。这些结果表明,不同海拔亚热带蕨类植物叶面积与质量的缩放关系支持DRH假说。该研究进一步增进了我们对一个古老且多样的植物谱系资源分配策略的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/b4864ff36c46/fpls-14-1187704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/97e2027fb3c3/fpls-14-1187704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/c4e80648279f/fpls-14-1187704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/b4864ff36c46/fpls-14-1187704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/97e2027fb3c3/fpls-14-1187704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/c4e80648279f/fpls-14-1187704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfa/10333482/b4864ff36c46/fpls-14-1187704-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Diminishing returns" and leaf area-biomass scaling of ferns in subtropical ecosystems.亚热带生态系统中蕨类植物的“收益递减”与叶面积-生物量缩放关系
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 27;14:1187704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704. eCollection 2023.
2
"Diminishing returns" in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China.中国东南部武夷山竹子叶面积与干质量缩放中的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2017 Jul;104(7):993-998. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700068. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Leaf-age and petiole biomass play significant roles in leaf scaling theory.叶龄和叶柄生物量在叶片比例理论中起着重要作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14:1322245. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1322245. eCollection 2023.
4
Influence of Leaf Age on the Scaling Relationships of Lamina Mass vs. Area.叶龄对叶片质量与面积缩放关系的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 8;13:860206. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.860206. eCollection 2022.
5
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
6
Scaling relationships of twig biomass allocation in Pinus hwangshanensis along an altitudinal gradient.黄山松小枝生物量分配沿海拔梯度的缩放关系
PLoS One. 2017 May 26;12(5):e0178344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178344. eCollection 2017.
7
"Diminishing returns" for leaves of five age-groups of Phyllostachys edulis culms.毛竹五个年龄组竹秆叶片的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2021 Sep;108(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1738. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
8
Influence of tree size on the scaling relationships of lamina and petiole traits: A case study using Decne.树木大小对叶片和叶柄性状缩放关系的影响:以Decne.为例的案例研究
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 19;14(7):e70066. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70066. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
"Diminishing returns" in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups.跨物种组和物种组内功能叶性状缩放中的“收益递减”
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 22;104(21):8891-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701135104. Epub 2007 May 14.
10
Evidence for "diminishing returns" from the scaling of stem diameter and specific leaf area.茎直径和比叶面积的标度比例的“收益递减”证据。
Am J Bot. 2008 May;95(5):549-57. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800034.

本文引用的文献

1
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
2
V.PhyloMaker2: An updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants.V.PhyloMaker2:一个经过更新和扩充的R软件包,可生成用于维管植物的非常大型的系统发育树。
Plant Divers. 2022 May 27;44(4):335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2022.05.005. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Influence of Leaf Age on the Scaling Relationships of Lamina Mass vs. Area.
叶龄对叶片质量与面积缩放关系的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 8;13:860206. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.860206. eCollection 2022.
4
The genetic control of leaf allometry in the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris.菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)叶片异速生长的遗传控制。
BMC Genet. 2020 Mar 14;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00838-2.
5
"Diminishing returns" in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China.中国东南部武夷山竹子叶面积与干质量缩放中的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2017 Jul;104(7):993-998. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700068. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses.丛林木本植物的叶片大小、比叶面积和微生境分布:物种水平和群落水平分析中的对比模式
Oecologia. 2002 Feb;130(3):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s004420100805. Epub 2002 Feb 1.
7
Different leaf cost-benefit strategies of ferns distributed in contrasting light habitats of sub-tropical forests.分布于亚热带森林不同光照生境中的蕨类植物叶片不同的成本效益策略。
Ann Bot. 2016 Mar;117(3):497-506. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv179. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
8
The scaling relationships between leaf mass and leaf area of vascular plant species change with altitude.维管植物物种的叶质量和叶面积之间的比例关系随海拔高度而变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076872. eCollection 2013.
9
Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology.辣:用于整合系统发育和生态学的 R 工具。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
10
Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis.单位叶面积叶质量(LMA)变异的原因及后果:一项荟萃分析。
New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-588. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x.