Duan Weiwei, Jiang Fei, Cai Haobing, Li Bijuan, Ouyang Song, Yin Weifan, Zeng Qiuming, Yang Huan
Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Department of Blood Transfusion, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 27;14:1212868. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1212868. eCollection 2023.
Lymphoplasmapheresis (LPE) is a new therapy developed on the basis of traditional plasma exchange (PE) in combination with leukapheresis. Currently, it remains unclear whether PE and LPE show differences in efficacy for severe MG.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 198 MG patients, 75 in the PE group and 123 in the LPE group, and the patients' Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Clinical Classification was Class IV. The treatment outcome was the change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) from baseline to the end of treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied for the balance of confounders between the two groups.
In this study cohort, the safety profile of LPE and PE was good and no serious adverse events were observed. Based on PSM, 62 patients treated with LPE and 62 patients treated with PE were entered into a comparative efficacy analysis. In the PE group, patients underwent a total of 232 replacements, with a mean of 3.74. PE significantly improved the patients' QMGS performance, with the mean QMGS decreasing from 22.98 ± 4.03 points at baseline to 18.34 ± 5.03 points after treatment, a decrease of 4.68 ± 4.04 points ( < 0.001). A decrease of ≥3 points in QMGS was considered a significant improvement, with a treatment response rate of 67.7% in the PE group. In the LPE group, patients received a total of 117 replacements, with a mean of 1.89. The patients' mean QMGS was 23.19 ± 4.11 points at baseline and was 16.94 ± 5.78 points after treatment, a decrease of 6.26 ± 4.39 points ( < 0.001). The improvement in QMGS was more significant in patients treated with LPE compared to the PE group ( = 0.039). The treatment response rate in the LPE group was 79%, which was not significantly different compared to the PE group ( = 0.16). The LEP group had a shorter mean length of stay compared to the PE group (10.86 ± 3.96 vs. 12.14 ± 4.14 days), but the difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.13). During the 2-month follow-up period, LPE may be associated with better functional outcomes for patients, with lower QMG score and relapse rate. LPE and PE were both effective in reducing the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and AChR-Ab. Compared to PE, LPE was superior in the reduction of AChR-Ab titer.
In severe MG, LPE may be a more preferred treatment option than PE. It achieves treatment outcomes that are not inferior to or even better than PE with fewer replacements. This study provides further evidence to support the application of LPE as a new treatment option for MG.
淋巴细胞去除术(LPE)是在传统血浆置换(PE)基础上结合白细胞去除术发展而来的一种新疗法。目前,PE和LPE对重症肌无力(MG)的疗效是否存在差异尚不清楚。
对198例MG患者进行回顾性分析,其中PE组75例,LPE组123例,患者美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)临床分级均为IV级。治疗结果为重症肌无力定量评分(QMGS)从基线到治疗结束的变化。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)法平衡两组间的混杂因素。
在本研究队列中,LPE和PE的安全性良好,未观察到严重不良事件。基于PSM,62例接受LPE治疗的患者和62例接受PE治疗的患者进入疗效对比分析。PE组患者共进行了232次置换,平均3.74次。PE显著改善了患者的QMGS表现,QMGS均值从基线时的22.98±4.03分降至治疗后的18.34±5.03分,下降了4.68±4.04分(<0.001)。QMGS下降≥3分被认为是显著改善,PE组治疗有效率为67.7%。LPE组患者共接受了117次置换,平均1.89次。患者基线时QMGS均值为23.19±4.11分,治疗后为16.94±5.78分,下降了6.26±4.39分(<0.001)。与PE组相比,接受LPE治疗的患者QMGS改善更显著(P = 0.039)。LPE组治疗有效率为79%,与PE组相比差异无统计学意义(P = 0.16)。LPE组平均住院时间比PE组短(10.86±3.96天 vs. 12.14±4.14天),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.13)。在2个月的随访期内,LPE可能使患者获得更好的功能结局以及更低的QMG评分和复发率。LPE和PE在降低炎性细胞因子(TNF-α、IL-1β和IL-6)水平及抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体(AChR-Ab)方面均有效。与PE相比,LPE在降低AChR-Ab滴度方面更具优势。
在重症MG中,LPE可能是比PE更优选择。它能以更少的置换次数达到不低于甚至优于PE的治疗效果。本研究为支持LPE作为MG新的治疗选择提供了进一步证据。