Suppr超能文献

五种采样器对不同大小悬浮颗粒物和微塑料颗粒的捕集效率。

Efficiency of five samplers to trap suspended particulate matter and microplastic particles of different sizes.

机构信息

Federal Institute of Hydrology, Department G - Qualitative Hydrology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, 56068, Koblenz, Germany.

Federal Institute of Hydrology, Department G - Qualitative Hydrology, Am Mainzer Tor 1, 56068, Koblenz, Germany.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;338:139479. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139479. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

Abstract

Suspended particulate matter (SPM) plays a major role in nutrient cycles and for the transport of pollutants within local and transboundary water catchments. Obtaining representative SPM samples from rivers, lakes, inland and coastal waters is crucial for quantitative and qualitative chemical analyses to correctly describe the chemical status of a water body. However, a representative sampling of SPM over time is challenging due to the heterogeneity of SPM particles sizes, their non-uniform distribution in rivers, and a variety of sampling devices being in use. Therefore, we investigated the efficiencies of five different sampling devices commonly used in national and international monitoring programs to collect representative SPM samples. We tested three passive sedimentation-based samplers (SBSs: sedimentation box, SB; sedimentation tank, ST; Raetz Sampler, RS), and two active separation techniques (continuous flow centrifuge, CFC; vacuum filtration, VF) in an experimental laboratory setup using in-house SPM standard suspensions (mineral, organic, and microplastic particles) with defined particle sizes. The mass-based efficiencies of the three examined SBSs were 0-66% for the mineral and organic particles <75 μm, where the mean particle sizes of collected samples were always shifted to bigger sizes compared to the initial suspensions. The efficiencies of the three SBSs to collect microplastic particles <80 μm were <20% due to the lower densities of microplastic compared to organic and mineral particles. In contrast to the SBSs, VF and CFC units showed excellent efficiencies >86% for all tested materials, with similar particle size distributions of the sampled material compared to those of the inlet suspensions. In conclusion, SPM sampling efficiencies of sampling units have to be carefully considered and compared to the respective aims of the monitoring approaches, especially when statements are derived from quantitative results on SPM.

摘要

悬浮颗粒物(SPM)在营养循环和局部及跨界流域内污染物的传输中起着重要作用。从河流、湖泊、内陆和沿海水域中获取具有代表性的 SPM 样本,对于进行定量和定性化学分析以正确描述水体的化学状况至关重要。然而,由于 SPM 颗粒大小的异质性、它们在河流中的不均匀分布以及各种采样设备的使用,对 SPM 进行代表性的长时间采样具有挑战性。因此,我们研究了五种常用于国家和国际监测计划的代表性 SPM 采样设备的效率。我们在一个实验室内使用自制的 SPM 标准悬浮液(矿物、有机和微塑料颗粒)进行了测试,这些悬浮液具有定义的粒径,使用了三种基于被动沉降的采样器(沉降箱、SB;沉降槽、ST;Raetz 采样器、RS)和两种主动分离技术(连续流离心机、CFC;真空过滤、VF)。对于<75μm 的矿物和有机颗粒,三种测试的 SBS 的基于质量的效率为 0-66%,其中收集的样品的平均粒径总是比初始悬浮液的粒径大。由于微塑料与有机和矿物颗粒相比密度较低,因此三种 SBS 收集<80μm 的微塑料颗粒的效率<20%。与 SBS 相比,VF 和 CFC 单元的效率>86%,对于所有测试的材料都非常出色,与入口悬浮液相比,采样材料的粒径分布相似。总之,采样单元的 SPM 采样效率必须仔细考虑,并与监测方法的各自目标进行比较,特别是在从 SPM 的定量结果得出结论时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验