• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜高级别非子宫内膜样癌(HG-NECs)的组织病理学和免疫组化预后因素:能否识别出风险增加的亚组?

Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Prognostic Factors in High-Grade Non-Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Endometrium (HG-NECs): Is It Possible to Identify Subgroups at Increased Risk?

作者信息

Paudice Michele, Biatta Chiara Maria, Scaglione Giulia, Parodi Alessia, Mammoliti Serafina, Moioli Melita, Centurioni Maria Grazia, Barra Fabio, Ferrero Simone, De Cian Franco, Mazzocco Katia, Vellone Valerio Gaetano

机构信息

Department of Integrated Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy.

Pathology University Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;13(13):2171. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132171.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13132171
PMID:37443564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10341374/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Endometrial cancer is an emerging disease with an increase in prevalence of aggressive histotypes in recent years.

BACKGROUND

In the present study, potential histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic markers were investigated. Consecutive cases of high-grade non-endometrioid carcinoma (HG-NEC) of the endometrium were considered.

METHODS

Each surgical specimen was routinely processed; the most significant block was selected for immunohistochemistry and tested for ER, PR, ki67, p53, E-cadherin, β-catenin, Bcl-2 and cyclin D1. For each immunomarker, the percentage of positive tumor cells was evaluated (%) and dichotomized as low and high according to the distribution in the study population. Follow-up was collected for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-three cases were eligible: 19 resulted in FIGO I-II; 14 resulted in FIGO III-IV. Twelve patients suffered a recurrent disease (mean follow-up 24.6 months); 8 patients died of the disease (mean follow-up 26.6 months).

RESULTS

Women with recurrent disease demonstrated a significantly higher Bcl2% (35.84 ± 30.96% vs. 8.09 ± 11.56%; = 0.0032) while DOD patients had higher ki67% (75 ± 13.09% vs. 58.6 ± 19.97%; = 0.033) and Bcl2% of border significance (34.37 ± 34.99% vs. 13 ± 17.97%; = 0.078). As expected, FIGO III-IV had a worse DFS (HR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.1-10.99; = 0.034) and OS (HR = 5.19; 95% CI: 1.27-21.14; = 0.0217). Bcl-2-high patients (Bcl2 > 10%) demonstrated a significantly worse DFS (HR = 9.11; 95% CI: 2.6-32.4; = 0.0006) and OS (HR = 7.63; 95% CI: 1.7-34; = 0.0084); moreover, PR low patients (PR ≤ 10%) had significantly worse DFS (HR = 3.74; 95% CI: 1.2-11.9; = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

HG-NEC represents a heterogeneous group of endometrial aggressive neoplasms with a worrisome prognosis, often at an advanced stage at presentation. Bcl-2 and PR may represent promising markers to identify a subgroup of patients having an even worse prognosis requiring a careful and close follow-up.

摘要

未标注

子宫内膜癌是一种近年来侵袭性组织学类型患病率不断上升的新兴疾病。

背景

在本研究中,对潜在的组织病理学和免疫组化预后标志物进行了研究。纳入了子宫内膜高级别非子宫内膜样癌(HG-NEC)的连续病例。

方法

对每个手术标本进行常规处理;选择最具代表性的组织块进行免疫组化检测,检测雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、Ki67、p53、E-钙黏蛋白、β-连环蛋白、Bcl-2和细胞周期蛋白D1。对于每个免疫标志物,评估阳性肿瘤细胞的百分比(%),并根据研究人群中的分布情况分为低和高两组。收集无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的随访数据。33例符合条件:19例为国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)I-II期;14例为FIGO III-IV期。12例患者出现疾病复发(平均随访24.6个月);8例患者死于该疾病(平均随访26.6个月)。

结果

复发患者的Bcl2%显著更高(35.84±30.96%对8.09±11.56%;P=0.0032),而死亡患者的Ki67%更高(75±13.09%对58.6±19.97%;P=0.033),Bcl2%具有临界显著性(34.37±34.99%对13±17.97%;P=0.078)。正如预期的那样,FIGO III-IV期患者的DFS更差(风险比[HR]=3.34;95%置信区间[CI]:1.1-10.99;P=0.034)和OS更差(HR=5.19;95%CI:1.27-21.14;P=0.0217)。Bcl-2高表达患者(Bcl2>10%)的DFS显著更差(HR=9.11;95%CI:2.6-32.4;P=0.0006)和OS更差(HR=7.63;95%CI:1.7-34;P=0.0084);此外,PR低表达患者(PR≤10%)的DFS显著更差(HR=3.74;95%CI:1.2-11.9;P=0.02)。

结论

HG-NEC代表一组异质性的子宫内膜侵袭性肿瘤,预后令人担忧,通常在就诊时处于晚期。Bcl-2和PR可能是有前景的标志物,可用于识别预后更差的患者亚组,这些患者需要仔细密切的随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/a9ad3f58fd54/diagnostics-13-02171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/3e844b59c1ac/diagnostics-13-02171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/2938961a1101/diagnostics-13-02171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/a9ad3f58fd54/diagnostics-13-02171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/3e844b59c1ac/diagnostics-13-02171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/2938961a1101/diagnostics-13-02171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb92/10341374/a9ad3f58fd54/diagnostics-13-02171-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Prognostic Factors in High-Grade Non-Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Endometrium (HG-NECs): Is It Possible to Identify Subgroups at Increased Risk?子宫内膜高级别非子宫内膜样癌(HG-NECs)的组织病理学和免疫组化预后因素:能否识别出风险增加的亚组?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;13(13):2171. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132171.
2
[The value of progesterone and estrogen receptors expression in tissue microarray method in prognosis of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer].组织芯片法检测孕激素和雌激素受体表达在子宫内膜样腺癌患者预后中的价值
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Feb;84(2):95-101. doi: 10.17772/gp/1547.
3
Molecular profile of grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: is it a type I or type II endometrial carcinoma?子宫内膜癌 3 级的分子特征:它是Ⅰ型还是Ⅱ型子宫内膜癌?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 May;36(5):753-61. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318247b7bb.
4
Non-endometrioid and high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancers show DNA fragmentation factor 40 (DFF40) and B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (BCL2) underexpression, which predicts disease-free and overall survival, but not DNA fragmentation factor 45 (DFF45) underexpression.非子宫内膜样和高级别子宫内膜样癌表现出 DNA 碎片因子 40(DFF40)和 B 细胞淋巴瘤 2 蛋白(BCL2)表达不足,这预测了无病生存和总生存,但不能预测 DNA 碎片因子 45(DFF45)表达不足。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4333-6.
5
Prognostic and predictive values of Nrf2, Keap1, p16 and E-cadherin expression in ovarian epithelial carcinoma.Nrf2、Keap1、p16和E-钙黏蛋白表达在卵巢上皮癌中的预后及预测价值
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 May 1;8(5):5642-9. eCollection 2015.
6
The prognostic significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors in grade I and II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: hormone receptors in risk stratification.I 级和 II 级子宫内膜样腺癌中雌激素和孕激素受体的预后意义:激素受体在风险分层中的作用。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;30(1):e13. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e13. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Immunohistochemical bcl-2 expression, p53 overexpression, PR and ER status in endometrial carcinoma and survival outcomes.子宫内膜癌中免疫组化bcl-2表达、p53过表达、孕激素受体(PR)和雌激素受体(ER)状态与生存结果
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(1):19-25.
8
Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry in endometrial carcinoma.孕激素受体免疫组织化学在子宫内膜癌中的预后意义
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Jun;69(3):220-5. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5023.
9
Immunohistochemical and genetic profiles of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma arising from atrophic endometrium.萎缩性子宫内膜来源的子宫内膜样腺癌的免疫组化及基因特征
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups.子宫内膜癌组织学类型对 TCGA 分子亚群预后价值的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05542-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring Endometrial Cancer Treatment Based on Molecular Pathology: Current Status and Possible Impacts on Systemic and Local Treatment.基于分子病理学的子宫内膜癌治疗定制:现状及对全身和局部治疗的可能影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 15;25(14):7742. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147742.
2
The Advantages of Next-Generation Sequencing Molecular Classification in Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis.下一代测序分子分类在子宫内膜癌诊断中的优势
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):7236. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237236.

本文引用的文献

1
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 子宫内膜癌管理指南。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate surrogate for TP53 mutational analysis in endometrial carcinoma biopsies.p53 免疫组化是子宫内膜癌活检中 TP53 基因突变分析的准确替代指标。
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):336-345. doi: 10.1002/path.5375. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Reclassifying endometrial carcinomas with a combined morphological and molecular approach.
采用联合形态学和分子方法对子宫内膜癌进行重新分类。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2019 Sep;31(5):411-419. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000560.
4
International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013.国际子宫内膜癌发病率的模式和趋势,1978-2013 年。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Apr 1;110(4):354-361. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx214.
5
Prognostic significance of reduced immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin in endometrial cancer-results of a meta-analysis.E-钙黏蛋白免疫组化表达降低在子宫内膜癌中的预后意义——一项荟萃分析的结果
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18689-96. eCollection 2015.
6
Update on prognostic markers for endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌预后标志物的最新进展。
Womens Health (Lond). 2014 May;10(3):277-88. doi: 10.2217/whe.14.13.
7
CyclinD1, a prominent prognostic marker for endometrial diseases.细胞周期蛋白 D1,子宫内膜疾病的重要预后标志物。
Diagn Pathol. 2013 Aug 15;8:138. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-138.
8
Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌的综合基因组特征分析。
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113.
9
The expression ratios of estrogen receptor α (ERα) to estrogen receptor β1 (ERβ1) and ERα to ERβ2 identify poor clinical outcome in endometrioid endometrial cancer.雌激素受体α(ERα)与雌激素受体β1(ERβ1)和 ERα 与 ERβ2 的表达比值可识别子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的不良临床结局。
Hum Pathol. 2013 Jun;44(6):1047-54. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
10
Molecular profile of grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: is it a type I or type II endometrial carcinoma?子宫内膜癌 3 级的分子特征:它是Ⅰ型还是Ⅱ型子宫内膜癌?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 May;36(5):753-61. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318247b7bb.