Losurdo Giuseppe, Martino Maria Ludovica, De Bellis Margherita, Celiberto Francesca, Rizzi Salvatore, Principi Mariabeatrice, Ierardi Enzo, Iannone Andrea, Di Leo Alfredo
Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Course in Organs and Tissues Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Department of Precision Medicine Jonic Area, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 29;12(13):4377. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134377.
An optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy is essential to increasing the quality of the examination. Visual booklets have been proposed with conflicting results to enhance bowel preparation. A literature search was performed in March 2023 in the most important databases. Only RCTs were selected. We calculated odd ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes. Mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) were used for continuous outcomes. We estimated heterogeneity with the Chi and the I statistics. In cases of high heterogeneity, a random effect model was used. Six studies were selected, enrolling 1755 patients overall. Adequate bowel preparation was observed in 86.7% of the booklet group versus 77.5% of the control group, with an OR = 2.31 in favor of the booklet. In studies using a 4-L PEG-based preparation, no difference compared to controls was observed, while in non-PEG formulations, preparation with booklets was better than in controls (OR = 5.10, 95% CI 1.82-14.27, = 0.002). Two studies were performed in an inpatient setting without any differences between booklets and controls, while outpatients receiving booklets had better results (OR = 7.13, 95% CI 5.39-9.45, < 0.001). The adenoma detection rate was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, booklets are useful to improve bowel preparation. Outpatient settings and preparations not containing PEG could benefit more from booklets.
结肠镜检查的最佳肠道准备对于提高检查质量至关重要。有人提出使用视觉手册来加强肠道准备,但结果相互矛盾。2023年3月在最重要的数据库中进行了文献检索。仅选择随机对照试验。我们计算了二分结果的比值比(OR)。对于连续结果,使用平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)。我们用卡方和I统计量估计异质性。在异质性较高的情况下,使用随机效应模型。共选择了6项研究,总计纳入1755例患者。手册组有86.7%的患者肠道准备充分,而对照组为77.5%,支持手册的OR = 2.31。在使用基于4升聚乙二醇(PEG)的制剂的研究中,与对照组相比未观察到差异,而在非PEG制剂中,使用手册进行的准备优于对照组(OR = 5.10,95%置信区间1.82 - 14.27,P = 0.002)。两项研究在住院环境中进行,手册组与对照组之间无差异,而接受手册的门诊患者结果更好(OR = 7.13,95%置信区间5.39 - 9.45,P < 0.001)。两组之间的腺瘤检出率相似。总之,手册有助于改善肠道准备。门诊环境以及不含PEG的制剂可能从手册中获益更多。