Huyge Ben, Sanctorum Jonathan, Jeurissen Ben, De Beenhouwer Jan, Sijbers Jan
imec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
DynXlab: Center for 4D Quantitative X-ray Imaging and Analysis, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;15(13):2887. doi: 10.3390/polym15132887.
The properties of fiber reinforced polymers are strongly related to the length and orientation of the fibers within the polymer matrix, the latter of which can be studied using X-ray computed tomography (XCT). Unfortunately, resolving individual fibers is challenging because they are small compared to the XCT voxel resolution and because of the low attenuation contrast between the fibers and the surrounding resin. To alleviate both problems, anisotropic dark field tomography via grating based interferometry (GBI) has been proposed. Here, the fiber orientations are extracted by applying a Funk-Radon transform (FRT) to the local scatter function. However, the FRT suffers from a low angular resolution, which complicates estimating fiber orientations for small fiber crossing angles. We propose constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) as an alternative to the FRT to resolve fiber orientations. Instead of GBI, edge illumination phase contrast imaging is used because estimating fiber orientations with this technique has not yet been explored. Dark field images are generated by a Monte Carlo simulation framework. It is shown that the FRT cannot estimate the fiber orientation accurately for crossing angles smaller than 70∘, while CSD performs well down to a crossing angle of 50∘. In general, CSD outperforms the FRT in estimating fiber orientations.
纤维增强聚合物的性能与聚合物基体中纤维的长度和取向密切相关,后者可以通过X射线计算机断层扫描(XCT)进行研究。不幸的是,分辨单个纤维具有挑战性,因为与XCT体素分辨率相比,它们很小,而且纤维与周围树脂之间的衰减对比度较低。为了缓解这两个问题,人们提出了基于光栅干涉术(GBI)的各向异性暗场断层扫描。在这里,通过对局部散射函数应用Funk-Radon变换(FRT)来提取纤维取向。然而,FRT的角分辨率较低,这使得在小纤维交叉角情况下估计纤维取向变得复杂。我们提出使用约束球面反卷积(CSD)作为FRT的替代方法来分辨纤维取向。由于尚未探索使用该技术估计纤维取向,因此这里使用边缘照明相衬成像代替GBI。暗场图像由蒙特卡罗模拟框架生成。结果表明,对于小于70°的交叉角,FRT无法准确估计纤维取向,而CSD在低至50°的交叉角下仍能良好运行。总体而言,在估计纤维取向上,CSD优于FRT。